-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Another good idea would be a 'freenet browser', something like Gecko or
No, it wouldn't. Gecko is for rendering (and I'd guess that WebKit is
also). It takes html and renders it. Freenet currently uses html, and
will probably continue to use it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| I know of two nat routers that work well under the load of freenet:
What about a cheap Linux box? 200 mHz + linux 2.6 + iptables works well
for me -- although I usually just run the freenet node on that box so
that it can be permanent...
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Madeline Brubaker wrote:
| Would someone step me through setting up Norton Internet Security
| Professional properly? I'm not entirely sure how to
Do yourself a favor, and don't run that software.
Yes, I'm a Linux nut. My attitude towards Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael R. Stork wrote:
[...]
| a hardware firewall and NAT. I wouldn't connect any PC direct to a
| cable/DSL line.
I would. A linux one. Or better, a BSD one. With daily updates. The
firewall really wouldn't help all that much for me, although I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|I'm not a Linux nut, but I agree with this in principal. Just using a
|software firewall is totally insecure. Your best bet, if you don't want
|to bother setting up a Linux box to act as your go between, [...]
|
|
| What, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicholas Sturm wrote:
| Dear
|
|Madeline Brubaker:
|
|
| Please excuse the nuts around here that seem to be as much of a
| problem as Apple lovers once were.
Ooh! Ooh! I smell a rant!
Please excuse my response to being called a nut.
| I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael R. Stork wrote:
| U, no offense, but are you just being intentionally argumentative ?
No, just trying to clear up a possible misconception. Some people have
this idea that there's some huge difference between a personal computer
and a
so. If they're curious, then they'll ask about it. But if someone is
asking for an answer to a very specific question, then turning it into
If someone asks Does anyone know how to make crispy bagels in the
microwave and I suggest using a toaster instead for that particular task,
then I'm not
If it's a very old computer it may not be able to run Freenet
adequately.
It should. I know it isn't. Freenet uses 100% CPU wherever I run it.
Heh. Well, not everyone who runs Freenet is as paranoid as some of our
users are. :)
They are patient enough with its slowness to be that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael R. Stork wrote:
| making beef stew. And you telling them that electric is no good, that
| before they do anything else they need to rip out their stove and
| install a gas one. Oh and beef isn't good for them anyway so here's this
| really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael R. Stork wrote:
| David Masover wrote:
|
| an excuse to tell them how ignorant they are for not doing it your way
|
| I was suggesting my way. I wasn't implying that anyone was stupid.
|
| Perhaps it wasn't you that made the first comment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now? I'm getting lots of
pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still
using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even
though the browser is on another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Oliveri wrote:
[...]
| days. Did you leave it running while properly opening up the port it
uses
| for incoming connections in your firewall (if needed)?
Yes. It's on the firewall machine, which really only does NAT anyway.
| I have an 2.5G
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs?
I think stable was actually better last I checked than unstable. Don't
know RNF or DNF from Dionsaur. 5-10 connections, 2 or 3 loaded before
the browser timed out (guess).
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Changing bandwidth limits on the fly may be quite difficult, but we'll get
| around to it eventually.. :)
Really? Would it be feasable to do an Apache-style graceful restart?
~ (Since files that are really too big should have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Blackdown works well with Freenet? I heard one bad report...
Unless it's causing my slowness, blackdown works fine for me. I'd
rather be using Kaffe, but I've had issues making that work on Gentoo.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mika Hirvonen wrote:
[...]
| case, you'll be better off running an another node locally.
Speaking of which:
I am leaving Freenet running on my router, in the hopes that FProxy will
eventually start responding, and that when it does, it will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Weiliang Zhang wrote:
| David Masover wrote:
| Mika Hirvonen wrote:
| [...]
| | case, you'll be better off running an another node locally.
|
| Speaking of which:
|
| Would it be worthwhile to also run a transient node on my local machine,
| instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zenon Panoussis wrote:
|
| Toad wrote:
|
| The thing is, the lack of search capabilities reduces
| the useability of freenet
|
|
| Of course. There are ways to implement search, however. Sooner or later
| somebody will implement a good spider based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| I need the output of:
| java -version 21 | head -n 1 | sed s/java version \\(.*\)\/\1/
| on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL
where the
| JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta).
1.4.1
I'm on Blackdown, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
|
|Unfortunately, I can't work on this at all right now. My freenet node
|looks fine, only I get a connection close from FProxy the instant I try
|connecting -- that is, 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zenon Panoussis wrote:
|
|
| David Masover wrote:
|
| Of course, if you don't own
| your own computer, how can you trust it? One-way trust. Suppose my bro
| trusts me, but I don't trust him, I have root, and he wants Freenet.
|
|
| You don't need
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| java -cp freenet.jar freenet.Version on a command line?
Freenet: Fred 0.5 (protocol STABLE-1.50) build 5084 (last good build: 5083)
| Show me it.
Same as what you've been seeing in the logs, pretty much. Since it dies
now same as ever.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TLD wrote:
| what's your mainport.allowedHosts= setting, and what's the IP of the
| computer you're trying to access from?
It's sane. Or you tell me:
http://slaphack.com/freenet.conf
http://slaphack.com/freenet.log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) makes some valid points. I didn't feel like
quoting the whole thing, but...
They are all moot if there's a big banner inserted onto every page which
points to an explanation of freenet (as well as a disclaimer somewhere),
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| No, if you can do that, then you can portscan for Freenet nodes. That's
| a REALLY bad idea. You need to use some sort of seednodes mechanism.
Why is that a bad idea? If a government is paranoid enough, they can
just put devices all
26 matches
Mail list logo
