[freenet-support] Throttling isp crashes my freenet node

2008-11-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
My freenet node keeps crashing on me. The wrapper.log file simply says... Restarting node: MessageCore froze for 3 minutes! ...at which point it begins to cleanly close the databases/datastores and does finally say a clean Goodbye from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (USM deadlock). This term deadlock came up

Re: [freenet-support] Node won't connect to peers 1167/68

2008-11-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 14:58:08 +0100, bqz69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have almost the same problem - my freenet continues to shut down several times a day, and I have to restart and get connected to open net peers. I am using: Build #1168 r23201 and -ext Build #24 r 23199 My node also

Re: [freenet-support] Node won't connect to peers 1167/68

2008-11-05 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:00:52 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It could very well be. Lack of memory resulting in constant garbage collection could easily cause a timeout. I really don't think it's low memory. I increased wrapper.java.maxmemory to 300, and even though only

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:02:40 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1169 is now available. Please update. No massive changes, but some important bugfixes which hopefully will fix some of the connectivity problems that have been reported recently: I'm having a LOT

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:42:35 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ., constantly using 100% cpu since being launched. I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've never seen them that high before. ___ Support mailing

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:13:11 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I should also add that my load averages (uptime) were at 80. I've never seen them that high before. Update: I tried it again, except this time I accidentally forgot to give it a seednodes.fref. The first attempt

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:28:38 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: .. BUT it was still consuming all the cpu!--supposedly not doing anything!? At this point I turned the logger back on, and to my horror, it immediately filled to over 70MB, 69.9 of which were errors of the form

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
Hrm.. sorry.. it seems to be working now that I'm using r23350. I was having all my problems with r23352--which I could have sworn was referenced in freenet-stable-latest.jar.url this morning :|. Anywho, sorry for the noise. ___ Support mailing list

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1169

2008-11-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:02:55 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you mind trying a recent testing build? update.sh testing / update.cmd testing ? The bugs in trunk have been largely fixed... Yes--things seem to be running a lot better as of r23371--the jvm hasn't hung yet

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1173, 1172 and 1171

2008-11-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 22:09:42 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In this last 2min test of mine, all of the errors came from my 1173 opennet peers. Only one of them was listed as BACKED OFF (I was/am connected to him for 4h49m)--the other two were (and still are) CONNECTED (for 48m

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1173, 1172 and 1171

2008-11-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 00:22:11 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1173 is now available. It is still using much more of (my 1.2GHz) cpu than I would like. It regularly hovers at 100% for a few minutes, then calms down, then repeats. And, probably not unrelated,

Re: [freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:40 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my downloads are failing with Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected as error

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1175

2008-11-14 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:16:55 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1175 is now available. Please upgrade. Changes: - Handle the Packet X sent Yms ago and still not acked bug better. Don't complain in the log until 10 minutes, then disconnect from the peer and log

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1175

2008-11-14 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:52:46 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It still has 100% CPU most of the time then? Apparently resulting from Freenet itself rather than downloads etc? Well, it's not /so/ serious that it stays at 100% all the time. It jumps up for a few minutes, then

Re: [freenet-support] Former mail Can't open again is out of date. Need Friends.

2008-11-14 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:56:25 + (GMT), Markus Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Supporters, the question I have sent to you some hours ago is obsolete. I have found the button to start it again. Freenet is running properly. Now I should try to find some friends. But still I don't know

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1178 (and 1176, 1177)

2008-11-14 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:39:45 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1178 is now available. Wow! What a difference. 1178 is like a totally different program, with respect to both cpu and memory usage. THANK YOU! It's no longer peaking for minutes at a time. It's

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1178 (and 1176, 1177)

2008-11-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:21:50 -0500, Dennis Nezic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:39:45 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freenet 0.7 build 1178 is now available. I spoke too soon. It works fine for an hour or two, but then, at least for me, all communcation

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:42:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems to be fixed with 1179 (this is the latest version) but for some reason we get no online update and update.cmd doesn't work for me. Others reported that update.sh works on Linux... Are you sure? From what I'm hearing in

Re: [freenet-support] SEVERE Bug report: duplicate of ID 0002694: 1178 kills some downloads

2008-11-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:59:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course I'm not sure, I'm not even able to get 1179 ^^ You should be able to download the snapshot jar from http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/ ... 1179 = r23606, and replace the one you're currently using.

Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-18 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:16:21 -0500 (GMT-05:00), vinyl1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Node won't start. I did a full manual update with update.cmd, same result. Java stack points to: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tools/bzip2/CBZip2InputStream. Here is full output from wrapper log:

Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 05:32:18 schrieb Dennis Nezic: WARNING - The Wrapper jar file currently in use is version 3.3.1 while the version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is 3.2.3. That looks

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1182-1185

2008-11-28 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:55:50 +, Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Changes in 1185: - Maybe fix the bandwidth collapsing bug. When a connection stalled, this bug caused us to lose messages, resulting in finished requests not being removed, resulting in the node thinking it is more

Re: [freenet-support] Some thoughts and suggestions

2008-12-10 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:32:07 +0100, Repu Blica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes this may go against the great Ivory Tower principle of utter Tolerance and Free Speech. The Tower may not be as straight and pretty anymore but it is still standing. Compare it to the alternative that provoked users

Re: [freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-11 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:39:59 +0100, Level 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What could be the problem? I have the latest Java installed. Outdated freenet.jar and/or freenet-ext.jar. I admit I hadn't run the 0.7 node for some time, and last time I ran it, it already reported it was too old. (Which

Re: [freenet-support] Trouble starting Freenet node

2008-12-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:29:09 +, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: If I were to have grounds to believe you were using Freenet - even 0.5 - to pirate music, I'd have to block you in my procmail ... PLEASE DO NOT USE FREENET TO VIOLATE COPYRIGHT LAW ! Per Grokster vs MGM, we

Re: [freenet-support] unable to find valid certification path to requested target

2008-12-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:21:32 +, jdavies jdavie...@tx.rr.com wrote: I see this in my alerts section: Build too old This node's software is older than the oldest version (Build #1192) allowed by the newest peers we try to connect to. Please update your node as soon as possible as you

[freenet-support] JVM keeps hanging and crashing Freenet

2008-12-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my wrapper will suddenly crash: JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM. JVM did not exit on request, terminated JVM received a signal SIGKILL (9). Reloading Wrapper configuration... It's not a new problem. Does this

Re: [freenet-support] please remove me from your mailing list.

2009-01-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:50:11 + (GMT), Mr Mr mrm...@rocketmail.com wrote: I no longer use freenet, I don't want to receive any more emails that have nothing of interest to me. Have you tried unsubscribing, using the link that is appended to every single message here? :) And, if it's of no

Re: [freenet-support] JVM keeps hanging and crashing Freenet

2009-01-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:11:07 -0500, Dennis Nezic denn...@dennisn.dyndns.org wrote: On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:41:42 +, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Friday 26 December 2008 17:50, Dennis Nezic wrote: After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has been running for the last couple of days). I did following: [cut] That's an ugly[1] hack :). And, doesn't your run.sh start a wrapper that should do

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has been running for the last

Re: [freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:56:48 +, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:51, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: So, Freemulet or Frost automatic insertion are dangerous? We know the key before the upload of the file. Yes IMHO. There's no such thing as

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-07 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-07 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:46:52 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:32:17 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:42:56 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009 02:53:19 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-07 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 17:22:52 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009 16:56:16 Dennis Nezic wrote: Do you have the most recent freenet-ext.jar? Yes Here is my newest wrapper log from 6. jan 2009: http://www.minihowto.org/6/wrapper.log Toad, this problem

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:01:25 +0100, bqz69 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote: But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly. Are you sure you need another wrapper around that wrapper? :) My freenet stopped again, in spite of

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:52:48 +, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009 17:55, bqz69 wrote: On Wednesday 07 January 2009 18:49:57 bqz69 wrote: But, Bzq69, your wrapper does seem to be restarting freenet properly. Are you sure you need another

Re: [freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196

2009-01-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is increased by 20 percent. With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others

Re: [freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196

2009-01-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:09:51 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is increased by 20 percent. With 1196

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:31:46 +0100, bqz69 wrote: I do not know much about the freenet internals, so I do not know. http://www.minihowto.org/4/ Here you can see my wrapper log from november, when the problem began? Okay, we may be able to fix the part about the wrapper

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 21 January 2009 03:01, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:52:26 +0100, bqz69 wrote: Now my freenet is running on my fit-pc - has been running properly the last week. I did following (I am

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1203

2009-01-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: There have been some question marks over whether it is possible to load an image from an external domain and get a callback when it is loaded - if so, it may be possible to time fetches of specific sites from javascript on an

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1203

2009-01-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:05:41 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Meaning running a web browser on a system with access to fproxy is dangerous. I haven't tested this, maybe you'd like to? I would imagine that the same problem exists on a system with access to fcp? or telnet if it's enabled? Ie.

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1203

2009-01-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 18:07:24 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: fproxy can still be probed for, just not individual sites... We should also warn about it in the README... You mean the executable/jar can still be probed for on the filesystem? Maybe. But it can't be done via the network interface, if

Re: [freenet-support] From FMS: insertion error

2009-01-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:10:57 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: h...@5fejudg2zdeqo-u4yoywc1zf4tgpwowlqcajvgcorv8 wrote: I have a big problem with recent releases (after 1194). Uploads crash. See this screenshot:

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box out the window and buy a new one. If you can't do that wait for the db4o branch. Or, more likely, throw freenet out the window :|. Seriously, EVERY time I have

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory, throw the box out the window and buy a new one. If you can't do that wait for the db4o branch. Or, more likely, throw

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-02 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Give it more memory. If you can't give it more memory

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:44:59 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:28:47 +, Matthew Toseland wrote

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-07 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:49:58 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thursday 05 February 2009 00:43, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:26:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 20:03, Dennis Nezic wrote

Re: [freenet-support] How to remove an opennet peer?

2009-02-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:45:29 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: I get the error message: One or more of your node's peers have never connected in the two weeks since they were added. Consider removing them since they are marginally affecting performance (wasting packets talking to nodes

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-02-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:13:59 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Memory usage was plateauing = memory usage was constantly at the (low) maximum, and it was using 100% CPU in a vain attempt to reclaim the last byte of memory. This is the most likely explanation by far Right. (Is it just me, or does

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:47:09 +0100, bqz69 wrote: It is still quite difficult to use and setup for normal people. More details would help :P. In Gentoo Linux, I do emerge freenet, and *done*. I have a running node ready to surf--err, maybe a quick wizard first :P. In Window$, I assume, you

Re: [freenet-support] Why is the development of the freenet project going so slow

2009-02-27 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:17:21 +0100, bqz69 wrote: The Freenet program might be something like one combined GUI (Graphic User Interface) where everything could be done, in order to use Freenet at its maximum capabilities - that's my dream. What you are dreaming of is an entire

Re: [freenet-support] problem with freenet starting. Plz help!

2009-03-08 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 12:56:37 -0700 (PDT), Noyb Castagna wrote: when attempting to start freenet, I get the browser page load error message:  Failed to Connect     Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at 127.0.0.1:. Is freenet running when you get this message? (I'm

Re: [freenet-support] using vista

2009-03-14 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:51:54 -0700, Keith * wrote: It installs fine. I just can't browse when I set the security too high. This is my first time using it. I believe high security means darknet-only operation ... which means you need to manually add friends to connect to.

Re: [freenet-support] uninstall comment page error - suggestions

2009-03-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:14:02 -0700, Mike Steiner wrote: Here are my suggestions - not sure if they went through: Have some easy way to pull over BitTorrent content (for example, after downloading something with a BitTorrent client, use Freenet to open that file/dir using an Import option,

[freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-04-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 HTTP socket handlers (86.7% of thread usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). I believe this is caused by my browser (dillo) making too many connections to fproxy. But, nevertheless, shouldn't

Re: [freenet-support] Solving I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0% : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-23 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:16:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: GORY DETAILS: Currently we use: CHK@routing key,crypto key,extra (Filenames afterwards are manifests, and therefore impact on the CHK) Isn't the first part supposed to be the data hash, and not a routing key. And what is a

Re: [freenet-support] Solving I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0% : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:15:43 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thursday 23 April 2009 21:23:24 Jack T Mudge III wrote: 1. It seems that when keys are posted on FMS (not so much frost), they often get chopped off at 80 characters, leaving the user to remove the newlines by hand. If the keys

Re: [freenet-support] Solving I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0% : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-04-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:23:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: ... IF the 3 nodes which stored it to their datastores are online when you fetch and there aren't any problems contacting them (e.g. on darknet they might have swapped). I'm still a little confused about what a routing key is. You

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1209

2009-05-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:08:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: In other news, Freenet has moved from using Subversion to keep its source code to Git. What's the link to the git repository? (Maybe the website should be updated to include it?) ___ Support

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1209

2009-05-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 1 May 2009 11:23:39 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:08:30 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: In other news, Freenet has moved from using Subversion to keep its source code to Git. What's the link to the git repository? (Maybe the website should be updated to include

Re: [freenet-support] Solving I queued it 2 weeks ago and it's still at 0% : are really long URIs a problem?

2009-05-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sun, 3 May 2009 01:46:37 -0400, Juiceman wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Friday 24 April 2009 17:46:09 freenetw...@web.de wrote: 1) CHK-keys are already long enough Long enough to be a PITA if they are longer? Or long enough

Re: [freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:59 +0400, Victor Denisov wrote: Any logging I can turn on to help? BTW, I have logging set to ERROR for now, as with NORMAL level it logs ~2Mb per minute, adding noticeably to overall disk contention. Maybe turning off logging helps? Does Juiceman also have logging

Re: [freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:16 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: What OS do you use for Freenet? Gentoo Linux, amd64 What is your current datastore size set to? 8GiB What is your output bandwidth limit set to? 9KB/s What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get? 7KB/s (average, my ISP

Re: [freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 6 May 2009 16:38:10 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 15:26:12 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:59 +0400, Victor Denisov wrote: Any logging I can turn on to help? BTW, I have logging set to ERROR for now, as with NORMAL level it logs ~2Mb per

Re: [freenet-support] CPU usage Re: Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 7 May 2009 00:23:37 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 23:52:22 Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Juiceman wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Wednesday 06 May 2009 14:43:59 Victor Denisov wrote: Matthew

Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-05-10 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 HTTP socket handlers (86.7% of thread usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). I believe this is caused by my browser (dillo) making too

Re: [freenet-support] Is it my system, or had builds 1208-1209 have severe performance issues?

2009-05-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 13 May 2009 13:29:47 -0400, Evan Daniel eva...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Friday 08 May 2009 17:40:58 Juiceman wrote: Weird.  node.db4o was an insane 375 MB.  I deleted it and and added a bunch of

Re: [freenet-support] Error loading KeyExplorer

2009-05-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 15 May 2009 21:30:05 +0200 (CEST), webspon...@voila.fr wrote: I got this error : Le plugin KeyExplorer n'a pas pu être chargé : could not find class def, may a missing lib? I've tried reinstalling Freenet but I always got this error. I think I've miss something, It's a fresh new

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2009-05-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:14:18 +, Jago Pearce wrote: This is my setup: 1) client computer with ssh forwarding on port 81 (ssh -D81) enabled conecting through 2) A proxy at address Proxy:8080 3) Connectng to my shell server runnig shh on port 443 If I login with ssh I can use

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

2009-05-17 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:14:18 +, Jago Pearce wrote: This is my setup: 1) client computer with ssh forwarding on port 81 (ssh -D81) enabled So this creates a SOCKS proxy on the remote ssh server you're connecting to, accessable via port 81 on your local client computer. conecting

Re: [freenet-support] How to set the datastore to a different disk on osx

2009-05-19 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 20 May 2009 03:05:22 +0200, Jelbert Holtrop wrote: Hi, I run freenet on osx and want to have freenet on a different drive from the startup disk. However during the installation of freenet I can only select the startup disk as destination for freenet. Is it possible to install

Re: [freenet-support] Failed uploads with 1212

2009-06-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:12:52 +0200, bbac...@googlemail.com wrote: It started with 1212. Nearly all of my uploads fail with 'Internal error' or 'Some blocks ran out of retries'. File size is from 7 to 23 MB. Does this happen only for me? I have also seen that error message a few times while

Re: [freenet-support] Failed uploads with 1212

2009-06-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:44:47 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:12:52 +0200, bbac...@googlemail.com wrote: It started with 1212. Nearly all of my uploads fail with 'Internal error' or 'Some blocks ran out of retries'. File size is from 7 to 23 MB. Does this happen only for me

Re: [freenet-support] Darknet port

2009-06-11 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:30:53 +0200, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: Thanks! I searched for explanations to backup my freemail identity, but I haven't found. How do I backup my freemail identity? Can we have this feature on the freemail plugin page? All your freemail identity's data is is

Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-06-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 30 May 2009 22:14:32 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 10 May 2009 15:51:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 HTTP socket

[freenet-support] db40 Internal error

2009-06-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
For the past few versions of freenet, at the moment I'm using 1216, sometimes if I add stuff to the download/upload queue my node.db40 closes and fproxy outputs Internal error where the files should have been listed. Restarting doesn't help--only deleting node.db4o :S. Here is what gets spit into

Re: [freenet-support] Assistance

2009-06-29 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:17:42 -0500, Kathryn A. Graham wrote: Terribly, terribly frustrating. [...] I'm about to throw up my hands and give up. That's part of the installation procedure. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o

2009-07-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:53:53 +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - From Frost (since nobody seems to be using Freenet from development team): - - Anonymous - 2009.06.30 - 08:18:42GMT - I had message internal error in

Re: [freenet-support] internal error - node.db4o

2009-07-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:25:26 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Friday 03 July 2009 15:35:09 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:53:53 +0100, VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - From Frost (since nobody seems to be using Freenet from

[freenet-support] 301 Moved Permanently ... ugh

2009-08-03 Thread Dennis Nezic
For the past few Freenet builds, fproxy's behavior has changed whereby it seems to use http 301 Moved Permanently to redirect downloads of the form 'http://localhost:/c...@../filename' to 'freenet:c...@..' ... but it doesn't seem to include the filename part in the redirected location ... or

Re: [freenet-support] 301 Moved Permanently ... ugh

2009-08-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:04:07 -0400, Evan Daniel wrote: On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Matthew Toselandt...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Tuesday 04 August 2009 05:29:35 Dennis Nezic wrote: For the past few Freenet builds, fproxy's behavior has changed whereby it seems to use http 301

Re: [freenet-support] High cpu usage when starting build 1229

2009-08-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
kind of infinite loop in the FCP handlers? On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:47:27 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: Ever since updating to build 1229, my java-freenet process takes up far too much cpu time than it should -- nothing is in the global queue and I deleted my node.db4o. Advanced stats page shows 1

Re: [freenet-support] can’t connect to the server “127.0.0.1”

2009-09-29 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:01:08 -0700, David Lowe wrote: I can't communicate with FreeNet anymore. For a while i couldn't view the interface in a browser, but could launch Thaw.jar by hand. Now however, that doesn't even work. Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet uninstall for new Build install

2009-10-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:38:47 +0700, l...@hushmail.com wrote: On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 19:04:34 +0700, Evan Daniel wrote: Please send replies to the support list; it makes it easier for others to help with the problem, and for anyone with the same problem to see the answer. (Unless, of course,

Re: [freenet-support] Brazilian court bans p2p

2009-10-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:03:13 +0200 (CEST), [Anon] Anon User wrote: Message-type: plaintext how does this precedent affect freenet? http://torrentfreak.com/brazilian-court-bans-p2p-software-090918/ Puta que pariu :P. It would spur freenet's growth and popularity -- not to mention the

Re: [freenet-support] JVM Problems

2009-10-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:46:42 -0500, Mason Brake wrote: I had the version of Java installed, reinstalled the VERY new one, and made sure that Firefox ran it as a plug-in. I still can't get in. What do I need to do? Just a quick note: freenet has nothing really to do with Firefox -- it can be

[freenet-support] Wget'ing freenet:USKs

2009-11-15 Thread Dennis Nezic
What is the purpose of the freenet: notation? (Besides complicating things.) When I try to wget -r -np a freesite, most links will not be fetched -- namely those that still use the ubiquitous /USK... url. (Because -np, --no-parent, is meant to only fetch files within a particular directory and

Re: [freenet-support] Important question about make webstie on freenet

2009-11-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:58:21 +0100, Gonzalo Castro Carballo wrote: hello, I'd like to create a website in Freenet. I have a question I can not resolve. After creating a website, how can I change the index to update the website?. Do I need to create and upload a new one?. What happens then with

[freenet-support] Out of memory: Emergency shutdowns

2009-12-16 Thread Dennis Nezic
My node pretty regularly goes down once every week from: Out of memory: Emergency shutdown to protect database integrity in progress If it can manage to adequately maintain memory for six days, why can't it do it for a few more? Is there nothing it can delete from memory to make room for

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page gives this error message too] I have posted about this bug as far back as June 12th '09, with freenet version

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:03:25 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page gives this error

Re: [freenet-support] I Like the Idea but....

2010-01-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:58:19 -0500, Tim Jones wrote: I think you need to publish a more user friendly description of the product and how it works. I am a fairly experienced PC/Windows user for many years and I made a career of data administration using technology. However, reading your website

Re: [freenet-support] trouble installing

2010-01-13 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:26:02 -0600 (CST), clos...@inbox5.com wrote: After downloading Freenet I try to install and I get an error message Freenet starter was unable to control the freenet system service. Reason: Service did not respond to signal. What do I have to do? Debug. For starters,

Re: [freenet-support] jSite trouble

2010-01-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
Fail. On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:38:43 -0500, Chris Dixon wrote: unsubscribe On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:48 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden bo...@pterodactylus.net wrote: On Tuesday 19 January 2010 13:26:51 Marco A. Calamari wrote: I'm using jSite to insert an already inserted freesite; I was

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1240

2010-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:18:57 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: - New version of Library with many improvements. It will still cause the node to crash with Out of Memory sometimes on searches for popular words. Lol. ___ Support mailing list

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Status Update

2010-02-04 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:35:30 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Ian's friend pupok is working on a new AJAXy user interface mockup for Freenet. Oh god no. Make sure it's easy to disable this garbage for people who still value control over their web pages (to read, parse, etc). Dillo doesn't (and

[freenet-support] Return of the Out of memory, Part LCXIX

2010-03-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
As I (and I'm sure others) mentioned before, my node is still going down (crashing?) regularly -- roughly weekly. I currently allocate it 150MB of (precious) ram. Here are my last 2 (of infinity) heap reports from the jvm dump: Heap def new generation total 46080K, used 41323K eden space

  1   2   3   4   >