Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-10-31 Thread Toad
One thing people haven't suggested yet: Log file rotation with deletion of old logfiles and a maximum space usage setting. On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:37:27PM +, Ian Clarke wrote: As the developers work hard to improve the core operation of Freenet, it can be easy to forget about the more

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2003-10-31 Thread Toad
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:11:23PM -0600, tripolar wrote: Hello all I need a program to crawl links in freenet to get sites in cache before I need them. I get frustrated with the speed of freenet and dead links. I have used freenet on windows linux and just installed freenet last night

Re: [freenet-support] Re: 5029 overloads

2003-10-31 Thread Toad
Reading between the lines... check your log file, have you had many OutOfMemoryErrors? On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:29:49PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote: I'm using default values for everything. Here are some relevant lines from my freenet.ini: # Select which implementation of

Re: [freenet-support] Re: 5029 overloads

2003-11-01 Thread Toad
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:45:53PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote: I am using YThreadFactory (obviously) and maximumThreads=300. Also, I'm allocating 128MB to java memory. I'll keep it running until the outgoing bandwidth gets really low. maximumThreads=300 = you need to give it more

Re: [freenet-support] Re: 5029 overloads

2003-11-01 Thread Toad
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 08:35:07AM -0500, Evan Berggren Daniel wrote: On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Toad wrote: maximumThreads=300 = you need to give it more memory. Recommend -Xmx256m, at least. Would it make sense to have freenet put a cap on the threads based on available memory, similar

Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-11-01 Thread Toad
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:31:58PM -0800, Paul wrote: I see the installation of Freenet and the configuration of Freenet to be an area that needs serious attention. First, I use Freenet on a Mac, but Mac OS X is not shown anymore as a compatible OS on the Freenet web site download page. It

Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-11-01 Thread Toad
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:35:53AM -0500, Nick Tarleton wrote: On Friday 31 October 2003 12:54 pm, Doug Bostrom wrote: The splitfile interface provides a useful measure of progress or at least continued activity. How about something to give users a little feedback while other key types are

Re: [freenet-support] why don't have freenet a connection?

2003-11-03 Thread Toad
# The IP address of this node as seen by the public Internet. You only need to override this if it cannot be autodetected, for example if you have a NAT (a.k.a. IP Masquerading) firewall/router, in which case you will need to set it to the IP address or DNS name of the internet-side

[freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5030

2003-11-01 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5030 is out. Major changes: * Makes 5029 mandatory. * Improvements to the Open Connections page especially in PeerHandler mode. * Improved plausible deniability for high HTL values. * Increased default size of failure table to 20,000. This should make it much more

[freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5032

2003-11-10 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5032 is now available. Use your update utility to upgrade (freenet-webinstall.exe or update.sh depending on platform). It is also available from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar (stop your node, install this over your current freenet.jar, start your

Re: [freenet-support] FreeBSD - seednodes?

2003-11-11 Thread Toad
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:38AM -0700, Todd Walton wrote: On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Todd wrote: I've installed freenet-0.5.2.r1 on FreeBSD 5.1 with jdk-1.3.1p8_2 from ports. Then you want the pre-NIO version of Freenet. jdk-1.3.1 can't handle NIO, I believe. Download, I think:

Re: [freenet-support] FreeBSD - seednodes?

2003-11-11 Thread Toad
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:57:33PM -, Matthew P. Cashdollar wrote: Todd said: Thank you Matthew, that is exactly what I needed. I installed JDK 1.4.1 and wget, ran update.sh, changed java to javavm in the scripts and it appears to be working. I did set ipDetectorInterval=0, was on

[freenet-support] [Dharmadoer7@aol.com: (no subject)]

2003-11-11 Thread Toad
Any ideas? I don't really know the windows stuff... - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (no subject) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi..had a couple of correspondences with you and appreciated the throroughness of the replies. If not you, one of you.

Re: [freenet-support] how to connect if the port 8888 is closed

2003-11-14 Thread Toad
Freenet can be configured to run on any port. Just set listenPort=20 (or whatever) in your freenet.ini (or freenet.conf in unix) file. There will already be a line saying listenPort= (X is some randomly generated port number), overwrite it. Then restart Freenet. If you haven't set up a node

Re: [freenet-support] Can't receive any Freenet data

2003-11-14 Thread Toad
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:39:18AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, today i wanted to take a look at freenet but when i started it, it didn't get any data from the freenet network. This is sadly a common first user situation. Exactly what happened? Did you try to fetch the links on the

Re: [freenet-support] Errors and stange cache behavior...

2003-11-14 Thread Toad
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 04:54:41PM -0600, James S. White wrote: I'm not sure what the error reporting procedure is, but... Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 17 in queue, 2077 millis since enqueued last item, 58031 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to

[freenet-support] Stable 5033

2003-11-14 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5033 is now available. Upgrade from the snapshots: http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar , or use update.sh or freenet-webinstall.exe. The only change in this build is to be compatible with (i.e. not choke on) the new seednodes format, which includes an extra

[freenet-support] [support-bounces@freenetproject.org: Auto-discard notification]

2003-11-18 Thread Toad
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Subject: Auto-discard notification From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 List-Id: support.freenetproject.org X-List-Administrivia: yes The attached message has been automatically

[freenet-support] Freenet stable 5030 - major bug fix

2003-11-17 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5037 is now available. Update your freenet node using update.sh, freenet-webinstall.exe, or the jar (save it over freenet.jar): http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . Don't forget to restart the node (you will need to shut it down before updating on Windows,

Re: [freenet-support] DSL settings

2003-11-19 Thread Toad
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:13:36PM -0800, Art Charbonneau wrote: When downloading through the regular Web my downloads typically run at 160 KB/sec. I'm talking PER FILE. There may be many simultaneous transfers. The main reason for this is that nodes typically run on ADSL, which typically has a

[freenet-support] Freenet Stable Build 5039

2003-11-19 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5039 is now available. Update your freenet node using update.sh, freenet-webinstall.exe, or the jar (save it over freenet.jar): http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . Don't forget to restart the node (you will need to shut it down before updating on Windows,

[freenet-support] Re: unsubscribe

2003-11-21 Thread Toad
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:06:15PM -0500, Roy M. Silvernail wrote: On Thursday 20 November 2003 19:36, Toad wrote: Please use the provided means for unsubscription: Be happy to if you can tell me where the fsck to find it. ___ Support mailing

Re: [freenet-support] Mysterious crashes with recent builds

2003-11-24 Thread Toad
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 12:16:45AM +0100, Anonymous wrote: Builds 5032 to 6246 on Win XP, Sun JRE 1.4.2_01-b06, 512 MB RAM, DSL connection with 1536/192 kbit/sec and dynamic IP address. Node is slowing down after several hours, then locks up. Systray Systray app shows red exclamation mark

Re: [freenet-support] Question on IPNetRouter for Macintosh

2003-11-24 Thread Toad
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:45:27PM +0100, Jan wrote: Hi, Just checking if I filled out the Port Mapping right. I have Freenet running on a win98 PC behind the IPNR router/firewall. Yeah, I know 98 isn't recommended, w98, w2k and xp just don't play well together on this box. In the

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Website insertion ?

2003-11-24 Thread Toad
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:53:42PM +0100, Michael Schierl wrote: On 15 Nov 2003 22:13:21 -, panta-admin wrote: Michael if you read this could you please invest some of your precious time into fiw, it cant handle splitfiles at the moment, if you read mxbee's message in devl: fuqid

Re: [freenetproject@gl00on.net: [freenet-support] Unable to establish loopback connection]

2003-11-25 Thread Toad
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 10:18:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, the following problem (which I reported earlier) continues to persist in the latest stable build. Any ideas on what might go wrong here and how to fix it would be appreciated. Attempting to start up freenet

[freenet-support] Stable Build 5044 was Re: [freenet-dev] Forking stable network with classic routing

2003-11-29 Thread Toad
Completed. Snapshots updated. Stable 5044 is now incompatible with the unstable network. We have updated the seednodes generator script, we have 3 nodes running 5044 generating seednodes... On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:29:35PM +, Toad wrote: We are forking the network, so that we have

Re: [freenet-support] how can i reseed?

2003-12-02 Thread Toad
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:09:41PM +0100, Aureliano Rama wrote: How can i reseed? It's enough to overwrite old seednodes.ref or do i need to make some other operation? Yes, that is sufficient. I suggest http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref . Stop the node first; the timestamp must

Re: [freenet-support] Problem accessing web interface from different computer

2003-12-03 Thread Toad
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 06:59:09AM -0800, Thomas M?ller wrote: Hi, I just installed freenet on a linux box with sun's java 1.4.2 package. This linux box does not have an X windows configured. When I open the web interface with lynx localhost: it works fine. However, if I try to access

Re: [freenet-support] Logfile rotation naming

2003-12-03 Thread Toad
This is fixed in 6369 (in CVS, snapshots will be updated soon), and will also be fixed in the next stable build. On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:30:40AM +, Richard Thomas Harrison wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone noticed that when you use logfile rotation the

[freenet-support] Stable build 5048

2003-12-03 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5047 is now available. Upgrade using update.sh or freenet-webinstall.exe, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet.jar . Apologies for two stable builds in such a short period, but we always put out a new build ASAP if we find a vulerability. The one

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Unable to establish loopback connection

2003-12-07 Thread Toad
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 07:49:11PM +, Toad wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 05:17:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, here's an update to the earlier problem I reported (Freenet failing to start on Windows XP SP1, log messages below

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Unable to establish loopback connection

2003-12-07 Thread Toad
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 05:17:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, here's an update to the earlier problem I reported (Freenet failing to start on Windows XP SP1, log messages below): [...] java.io.IOException: Unable to establish loopback connection at

[freenet-support] Testing

2003-12-07 Thread Toad
Testing fix to archive line in sig. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support

Re: [freenet-support] Kaffe, OBSD 3.4, Failed to locate native library libnative in path

2003-12-07 Thread Toad
Unfortunately freenet is not compatible with Kaffe 1.0.6. Freenet does not work currently even with Kaffe 1.1.x, but that is being worked on heavily. If you can install the Sun JVM 1.4, do that... there was a branch of Freenet that didn't use NIO, but it's not compatible with the current network.

Re: [freenet-support] 160 JVM after one simple session

2003-12-10 Thread Toad
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:34:27PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gentle Reader: I have my node running (build 5049) 2G store 500 Mbit down 100Mb up (half my ADSL bandwidth) 400MH Pentium RedHat 9.0 Using dyndns domain name on ip address. I use lynx mostly. I have been able on

[freenet-support] Stable 5050

2003-12-10 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5050 is now available. Upgrade via freenet-webinstall.exe on Windows or update.sh on *nix, or get http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar and replace your freenet.jar with it. The one and only change here is to disable probabilistic caching. This is a feature

Re: [freenet-support] hijacking

2003-12-16 Thread Toad
Eh? What exactly is happening? On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:18:13PM -0600, Robert Greenage wrote: there might be some credability to the conspiracy theories being offered recently. my web browser ie 6.0.28 will no longer respond to being adjusted to any site other 127.0.0.1:. i recognize

[freenet-support] Stable 5051, and future work

2003-12-27 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5051 is now available. Upgrade via freenet-webinstall.exe on Windows or update.sh on *nix, or get http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar and replace your freenet.jar with it. This build contains two changes: 1. A major bug in PeerHandler was fixed. This

[freenet-support] Request for help: Seednodes harvesting not working well

2003-12-30 Thread Toad
Would the owners of soros.ca and freenet.teitel.net please mail me to the effect that either: a) They will be running the node on unstable for the foreseeable future. or b) They will be running it on stable. We also urgently need reliable permanent stable branch nodes to read seednodes from. We

Status report and request for help was Re: [freenet-support] Request for help: Seednodes harvesting notworking well

2003-12-30 Thread Toad
that should improve the network performance, and on the unstable branch, multiplexing has been committed, which should, once debugged (that may take some time!), improve performance and reduce resource usage in a variety of ways. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Original Message] From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: RE: [freenet-support] Unsubscribe - no link in the emails I get was [Mailer-Daemon@amphibian.dyndns.org: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]

2004-01-02 Thread Toad
the headers. -- Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from toad by amphibian.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AcRtV-00088T-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:11:25 + Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:11:25 + To: J B [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Expanding a datastore

2004-01-02 Thread Toad
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:12:04PM +1300, John Huttley wrote: Hi, Is there any way of expanding a ds?, I'd like to go from 5Gb to maybe 10, _Without_ erasing it. No problem, just change the storeSize in the config. Regards John -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project

Re: Fwd: [freenet-support] bug in 6430

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:31:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE== Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:16:31 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0

Re: [freenet-support] bug in 6430

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:10:36PM -0500, Edward J. Huff wrote: On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just do not know, where to report this, (probably it was noticed already anyway...), but the bandwith limiting in unstable version 6430 seems to be broken: Current

Re: [freenet-support] General question

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:29:35AM -0600, Chris wrote: I used to use Freenet on a dialup modem with only my OpenBSD firewall/NAT box between me and the internet (my ISP just did straight packet passing, back then). This was 1999-2000-ish :) Back then, Freenet and fproxy were CLI only, but

Re: [freenet-support] Advice on building a specialised node

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:51:30PM +, Roger Hayter wrote: Can anyone advise me where I might start looking to modify a node so it rejects all requests outside a small area of keyspace? I presume there must be a routine that accepts requests for further processing, and one it could call

Re: [freenet-support] Connection between stable and unstable network

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:31:48PM +, Roger Hayter wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen Mollett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Hi, --- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some popular boards seem almost all to be retrievable both from the

Re: [freenet-support] Connection between stable and unstable network

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote: Hi, --- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some popular boards seem almost all to be retrievable both from the stable and the unstable network? ... doesn't this suggest

Re: [freenet-support] Connection between stable and unstable network

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:15AM +, Toad wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote: Hi, --- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some popular boards seem almost all to be retrievable both from

[freenet-support] Unstable build 6432

2004-01-09 Thread Toad
Freenet unstable build 6432 is now available from CVS and the snapshots should be updated by the time you read this. The major change is the reinstatement of bandwidth limiting, in order to try to eliminate it as a major cause of network brokenness. This may well lead to a significant degradation

[freenet-support] Unstable build 6433

2004-01-09 Thread Toad
Administrative note: in future announcements of unstable builds will only go to the devl and tech lists, please subscribe to one of those lists if you run unstable. Freenet unstable build 6433 is now available. Changelog: * Fixed a major bug that was causing connections to be incapable of

[freenet-support] Stable Build 5054: Multiplexing merged!

2004-01-12 Thread Toad
Stable build 5054 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Download it from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar or use freenet-webinstall.exe or update.sh to upgrade. Source is also available at http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-stable-latest.src.tar.bz2 .

[freenet-support] Stable build 5055

2004-01-13 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5055 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users

[freenet-support] [freenet-dev] Stable build 5056

2004-01-13 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5055 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users

Re: [freenet-support] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: freenet/support/StripedBucketArray

2004-01-13 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:10:03PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote: Running build 5055 on Linux 2.6.1 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 and Y threads. Just completed a Fuqid download but FEC decoding failed with this trace: Fixed in 5056. 13.01.2004 22:10:44 (freenet.node.Node, YThread-75, ERROR): Error

[freenet-support] Stable build 5058

2004-01-13 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5058 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users

Re: [freenet-support] 5058: Crack open some bubbly!

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:24:17AM +, Kevin Steen wrote: After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I think the current Freenet release is a major step forward. Everyone involved should give themselves a pat on the back and take a moment to celebrate - the war

Re: [freenet-support] an idiot's guide for freenet?

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
Just download the one with the JVM... On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:42:27AM -0800, Bill Haley wrote: Hello, I would like to download and run freenet software but I'm given the option of dl'ing the software with or without Java 1.4.1. How can I determine what version of Java I am currently

Re: [freenet-support] Build 5060?

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:32:38PM -, Kevin Bennett wrote: I see on the web interface page: Build: 5058 (Latest: 5060) freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar still has the same timestamp as when 5058 came out (13-Jan-2004 18:20) I don't see any 5060 nodes in the OCM or node

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
seednodes ?!?) *scratches head* i see no sense in the current noderef politics. I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not at all sure those node are all stable (have my doubts). [Original Message] From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
noderef politics. I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not at all sure those node are all stable (have my doubts). [Original Message] From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 1/14/2004 3:16

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:43:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h= as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable-stable or the ot= her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20 seednodes

[freenet-support] Re: Signatures on builds?

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
I don't know. I don't personally vouch for every last bit of code... Many others contribute to the code.. We cannot establish very much trust in it anyhow, something might have gone into CVS without a CVS mail being generated, the CVS-mail generated might not have been noticed yet, or the change

[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Please help: seednode sources

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
, 2004 at 08:08:07PM +, Toad wrote: We need more sources of seednodes for the new stable branch. Please mail me with the URL to fetch seednodes from. It must be accessible from dodo.freenetproject.org (by IP), but it need not be visible to the rest of the internet. You can do this by setting

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5059

2004-01-14 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote: I am getting some of these: Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does it provide a stack trace? Got a trailer chunk ahead of our time!: message starts 6880, stream currently at 0 from [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Request for including your software in our database

2004-01-15 Thread Toad
Thank you. The actual version of the software was 0.4. We are way behind 1.0, let alone 4.0. The current officially released version is 0.5.2, which you can get from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.tar.gz (for *nix), or

[freenet-support] Stable build 5061

2004-01-15 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5061 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users

Re: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Someone wrote: Hi, at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, high CPU and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading What CPU do you have? How much

Re: [freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:27:46PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: Hi, at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, What kind of errors ? high CPU and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: Niklas Bergh schrieb: Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can download it. Seems to be only 1.3.1

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:28PM +0100, Someone wrote: Herve Lefebvre schrieb: Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. Well maybe there will be one in the future. But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I tried it

Re: [freenet-support] Specialisation with stable was Re: Marked specialisation with 6441

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:17:14PM +, Kevin Steen wrote: I think anyone who regularly browses Freenet is going to destroy their node's specialisation. Not really a big problem since it means popular content is available from more places in the network. Also, recent changes (in 5061) to

Re: [freenet-support] Minor installer warts

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:50:55AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: This puzzles me. The win installer has worked without a hitch (except to ask you to shut down freenet) as long as I've used it. The only difference I've seen recently is twice (not always) reporting a failure to complete a

Re: [freenet-support] Number of stable nodes

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:39:55AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote: Yet a couple... Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 621 (576/45/956) Number of distinct nodes connected 507 Okay, so it's definitely not that the network is that small - either it's a limited-horizons problem, or more

Re: [freenet-support] Latest build: 5070 ??

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:08:30PM -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote: On 18 Jan 2004 at 5:24, S wrote: Anyone can change the latest build number by editing Version.java and compiling the source on their machine. If you were so inclined, you could change your latest build number to and

Re: [freenet-support] GNU/Linux freenet.conf settings

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:31:26PM +, Russell Hedger wrote: I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying and then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my node updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more often

Re: [freenet-support] GNU/Linux freenet.conf settings

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying and then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my node updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more

Re: [freenet-support] 5061 dropping good RT nodes?

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:16:33AM +, Kevin Steen wrote: Anyone else seeing a decline in the number of contactable nodes in the routing table? My node seems to be dropping the most backed-off entries (CP=0.0), but retaining the entries which can't be contacted (CP=1.0). Wrong way

Re: [freenet-support] New with this ... please some help.

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:33:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I found a doc about freenet and have been these last days trying to connect. The program installed without any problem. I installed the version who comes with Java. After some minutes

Re: [freenet-support] Re: What things of Freenet eats the most memory

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:51:32AM +0100, Someone wrote: After more experiments with the node it seems like it needs way more memory than I can give it. I stopped all other services running on the machine and give fred the whole 192 MB that were not needed by windows. With this it managed to

Re: [freenet-support] Helping with website a little question...

2004-01-19 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:35:00AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote: I would suggest the project leader Ian Clarke, [EMAIL PROTECTED] He will most likely read your mail very soon. :) It seems this email adress is invalid. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct address. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] 5063

2004-01-20 Thread Toad
That's odd, there's no obvious reason it should use much CPU, and the previous builds didn't generally... what's your bandwidth? On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:39:26PM +0100, Peter Nilsson wrote: Hi All I have been using unstable for some time but for some time by system don't work any

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet haiku errmm

2004-01-20 Thread Toad
What happens when you try to insert? The usual very very very long verification times? On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:09:54AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote: Limerick ;-) I would like to put it on my Freesite 'Newsbyte's Flimsy Flog' too, but, alas... :-) There once was a new Freenet node, to

[freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5062

2004-01-20 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5062 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users

[freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063

2004-01-20 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063

2004-01-20 Thread Toad
Sorry, I announced this slightly prematurely. The snapshots have been updated now. On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:55:34PM +, Toad wrote: Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet

Re: [freenet-support] where is the routing table in 5063?

2004-01-21 Thread Toad
You mean from the web interface? http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html - as it always has been. On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:13:26PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote: where is the routing table in 5063? with regards, Max Moritz Sievers -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] Wha Wha What?

2004-01-21 Thread Toad
Nothing important. IT means your node is pretty severely CPU overloaded, probably. It will be a lower visibility in future builds. On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:57:26PM +0100, Arne Teichmann wrote: Just saw that in my log, what does it mean? Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 10 in queue, 2473

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063

2004-01-22 Thread Toad
. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad Sent: 22 January 2004 01:45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063 Your numbers are amazing, and far higher than mine or those of another node I've been able

Re: [freenet-support] where is the routing table in 5063?

2004-01-22 Thread Toad
20:41:51 + Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You mean from the web interface? http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html - as it always has been. On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:13:26PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote: where is the routing table in 5063? with regards

Re: [freenet-support] Harvester problem ?

2004-01-22 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:30:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Current seednodes.ref is 5.6Mb, filled with this kind of lines Estimator.erTransferSuccess.Store.7.Key=69888e24fa0323034be788eac1b82cf1dab6c6b4701f40 Estimator.erTransferSuccess.Store.7.Time=dd4 I crash my stable node; is

[freenet-support] Request for help

2004-01-27 Thread Toad
Two things: 1. Does anyone know where the scripts used for the old watchme server are? 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql

Re: [freenet-support] Request for help

2004-01-30 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote: Toad wrote: 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql or similar

Re: [freenet-support] Request for help

2004-01-30 Thread Toad
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:27:19AM +, Ian Clarke wrote: Toad wrote: On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote: Toad wrote: 2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed? This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth, CPU

Re: [freenet-support] too much memory used

2004-01-31 Thread Toad
Bandwidth? On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote: No. Nikita. Toad wrote: On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote: I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at 64MB. And FreeNet still works great

Re: [freenet-support] I meant it like a one time donation

2004-02-02 Thread Toad
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 11:59:57AM -0500, Stefano Santoro wrote: Hi, please take me off immediately from your subscription service. Consider this february donation the last one. This means I have donated to you 60 dollars so far, when I really meant donating only 20. I would consider a

Re: [freenet-support] Failed to send IdentifyPacketMessage Errors

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote: It is an effect of a connection being closed quite immediately after it was opened. Could we move the enqueueing of the identify message a little while later? No. Identify has to be the first message sent. It's logged at NORMAL

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:02:45PM +0100, Daniele wrote: Hi! I've downoloaded freenet some days ago. I istalled it on two machines: one is running Windows XP, the other is running Linux Mandrake 9.2. I've encountered some problems in both the installations. In Windows XP i've correctly

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Toad
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:06:46PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote: On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:16, Troed S?ngberg wrote: Toad, Since re-introducing NGR into stable at least my node has grinded almost to a halt with similar symptoms. A very small amount of connections, almost none

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >