One thing people haven't suggested yet:
Log file rotation with deletion of old logfiles and a maximum space
usage setting.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:37:27PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
As the developers work hard to improve the core operation of Freenet, it
can be easy to forget about the more
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:11:23PM -0600, tripolar wrote:
Hello all
I need a program to crawl links in freenet to get sites in cache before
I need them. I get frustrated with the speed of freenet and dead links.
I have used freenet on windows linux and just installed freenet last
night
Reading between the lines... check your log file, have you had many
OutOfMemoryErrors?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 10:29:49PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
I'm using default values for everything. Here are some relevant lines
from my freenet.ini:
# Select which implementation of
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:45:53PM -0800, Martin Stone Davis wrote:
I am using YThreadFactory (obviously) and maximumThreads=300. Also, I'm
allocating 128MB to java memory. I'll keep it running until the
outgoing bandwidth gets really low.
maximumThreads=300 = you need to give it more
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 08:35:07AM -0500, Evan Berggren Daniel wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Toad wrote:
maximumThreads=300 = you need to give it more memory. Recommend
-Xmx256m, at least.
Would it make sense to have freenet put a cap on the threads based on
available memory, similar
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:31:58PM -0800, Paul wrote:
I see the installation of Freenet and the configuration of Freenet to
be an area that needs serious attention.
First, I use Freenet on a Mac, but Mac OS X is not shown anymore as a
compatible OS on the Freenet web site download page. It
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:35:53AM -0500, Nick Tarleton wrote:
On Friday 31 October 2003 12:54 pm, Doug Bostrom wrote:
The splitfile interface provides a useful measure of progress or at least
continued activity. How about something to give users a little feedback
while other key types are
# The IP address of this node as seen by the public Internet. You only need to
override this if it cannot be autodetected, for example if you have a NAT
(a.k.a. IP Masquerading) firewall/router, in which case you will need to set
it to the IP address or DNS name of the internet-side
Freenet stable build 5030 is out. Major changes:
* Makes 5029 mandatory.
* Improvements to the Open Connections page especially in PeerHandler
mode.
* Improved plausible deniability for high HTL values.
* Increased default size of failure table to 20,000. This should make it
much more
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:35:38AM -0700, Todd Walton wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Todd wrote:
I've installed freenet-0.5.2.r1 on FreeBSD 5.1 with jdk-1.3.1p8_2 from
ports.
Then you want the pre-NIO version of Freenet. jdk-1.3.1 can't handle NIO,
I believe.
Download, I think:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:57:33PM -, Matthew P. Cashdollar wrote:
Todd said:
Thank you Matthew, that is exactly what I needed.
I installed JDK 1.4.1 and wget, ran update.sh, changed java to javavm in
the scripts and it appears to be working.
I did set ipDetectorInterval=0, was on
Any ideas? I don't really know the windows stuff...
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (no subject)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi..had a couple of correspondences with you and appreciated the
throroughness of the replies. If not you, one of you.
Freenet can be configured to run on any port. Just set listenPort=20 (or
whatever) in your freenet.ini (or freenet.conf in unix) file. There will
already be a line saying listenPort= (X is some randomly generated
port number), overwrite it. Then restart Freenet. If you haven't set up
a node
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:39:18AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
today i wanted to take a look at freenet but when i started it,
it didn't get any data from the freenet network.
This is sadly a common first user situation.
Exactly what happened? Did you try to fetch the links on the
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 04:54:41PM -0600, James S. White wrote:
I'm not sure what the error reporting procedure is, but...
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 17 in queue, 2077 millis since enqueued last
item, 58031 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to
Freenet stable build 5033 is now available. Upgrade from the snapshots:
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar , or use
update.sh or freenet-webinstall.exe. The only change in this build is to
be compatible with (i.e. not choke on) the new seednodes format, which
includes an extra
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Subject: Auto-discard notification
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
List-Id: support.freenetproject.org
X-List-Administrivia: yes
The attached message has been automatically
Freenet stable build 5037 is now available. Update your freenet node
using update.sh, freenet-webinstall.exe, or the jar (save it over
freenet.jar): http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar .
Don't forget to restart the node (you will need to shut it down before
updating on Windows,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:13:36PM -0800, Art Charbonneau wrote:
When downloading through the regular Web my downloads typically run at 160 KB/sec.
I'm talking PER FILE. There may be many simultaneous transfers. The main
reason for this is that nodes typically run on ADSL, which typically has
a
Freenet stable build 5039 is now available. Update your freenet node
using update.sh, freenet-webinstall.exe, or the jar (save it over
freenet.jar): http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar .
Don't forget to restart the node (you will need to shut it down before
updating on Windows,
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 08:06:15PM -0500, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
On Thursday 20 November 2003 19:36, Toad wrote:
Please use the provided means for unsubscription:
Be happy to if you can tell me where the fsck to find it.
___
Support mailing
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 12:16:45AM +0100, Anonymous wrote:
Builds 5032 to 6246 on Win XP, Sun JRE 1.4.2_01-b06, 512 MB RAM,
DSL connection with 1536/192 kbit/sec and dynamic IP address.
Node is slowing down after several hours, then locks up. Systray
Systray app shows red exclamation mark
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:45:27PM +0100, Jan wrote:
Hi,
Just checking if I filled out the Port Mapping right.
I have Freenet running on a win98 PC behind the IPNR router/firewall.
Yeah, I know 98 isn't recommended, w98, w2k and xp just don't play
well together on this box.
In the
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 08:53:42PM +0100, Michael Schierl wrote:
On 15 Nov 2003 22:13:21 -, panta-admin wrote:
Michael if you read this could you please invest some of your precious time
into fiw, it cant handle splitfiles at the moment,
if you read mxbee's message in devl: fuqid
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 10:18:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
the following problem (which I reported earlier) continues to persist in the
latest stable build. Any ideas on what might go wrong here and how to fix it
would be appreciated.
Attempting to start up freenet
Completed. Snapshots updated. Stable 5044 is now incompatible with the
unstable network. We have updated the seednodes generator script, we
have 3 nodes running 5044 generating seednodes...
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 07:29:35PM +, Toad wrote:
We are forking the network, so that we have
This is fixed in 6369 (in CVS, snapshots will be updated soon), and will
also be fixed in the next stable build.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:30:40AM +, Richard Thomas Harrison wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has anyone noticed that when you use logfile rotation the
Freenet stable build 5047 is now available. Upgrade using update.sh or
freenet-webinstall.exe, or get the jar from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet.jar .
Apologies for two stable builds in such a short period, but we always
put out a new build ASAP if we find a vulerability.
The one
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 07:49:11PM +, Toad wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 05:17:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
here's an update to the earlier problem I reported (Freenet failing to start
on Windows XP SP1, log messages below
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 05:17:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
here's an update to the earlier problem I reported (Freenet failing to start
on Windows XP SP1, log messages below):
[...]
java.io.IOException: Unable to establish loopback connection
at
Testing fix to archive line in sig.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support
Unfortunately freenet is not compatible with Kaffe 1.0.6. Freenet does
not work currently even with Kaffe 1.1.x, but that is being worked on
heavily. If you can install the Sun JVM 1.4, do that... there was a
branch of Freenet that didn't use NIO, but it's not compatible with the
current network.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:34:27PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentle Reader:
I have my node running (build 5049)
2G store 500 Mbit down 100Mb up (half my ADSL bandwidth)
400MH Pentium RedHat 9.0
Using dyndns domain name on ip address.
I use lynx mostly.
I have been able on
Eh? What exactly is happening?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:18:13PM -0600, Robert Greenage wrote:
there might be some credability to the conspiracy theories being offered recently.
my web browser ie 6.0.28 will no longer respond to being adjusted to any site other
127.0.0.1:. i recognize
Freenet stable build 5051 is now available. Upgrade via
freenet-webinstall.exe on Windows or update.sh on *nix, or get
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar and replace your
freenet.jar with it.
This build contains two changes:
1. A major bug in PeerHandler was fixed. This
Would the owners of soros.ca and freenet.teitel.net please mail me to
the effect that either:
a) They will be running the node on unstable for the foreseeable future.
or
b) They will be running it on stable.
We also urgently need reliable permanent stable branch nodes to read
seednodes from. We
that
should improve the network performance, and on the unstable branch,
multiplexing has been committed, which should, once debugged (that may
take some time!), improve performance and reduce resource usage in a
variety of ways.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Original Message]
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED
the headers. --
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from toad by amphibian.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AcRtV-00088T-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:11:25 +
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:11:25 +
To: J B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:12:04PM +1300, John Huttley wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way of expanding a ds?,
I'd like to go from 5Gb to maybe 10, _Without_ erasing it.
No problem, just change the storeSize in the config.
Regards
John
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:31:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
==BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:16:31 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:10:36PM -0500, Edward J. Huff wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just do not know, where to report this, (probably it was noticed already
anyway...), but the bandwith limiting in unstable version 6430 seems to be broken:
Current
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:29:35AM -0600, Chris wrote:
I used to use Freenet on a dialup modem with only my OpenBSD firewall/NAT
box between me and the internet (my ISP just did straight packet passing,
back then). This was 1999-2000-ish :)
Back then, Freenet and fproxy were CLI only, but
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:51:30PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
Can anyone advise me where I might start looking to modify a node so it
rejects all requests outside a small area of keyspace? I presume there
must be a routine that accepts requests for further processing, and one
it could call
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 06:31:48PM +, Roger Hayter wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen
Mollett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi,
--- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
popular boards seem
almost all to be retrievable both from the
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote:
Hi,
--- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
popular boards seem
almost all to be retrievable both from the stable
and the unstable
network? ... doesn't this suggest
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:15AM +, Toad wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:01:19PM +, Stephen Mollett wrote:
Hi,
--- Roger Hayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone noticed that Frost messages in some
popular boards seem
almost all to be retrievable both from
Freenet unstable build 6432 is now available from CVS and the snapshots
should be updated by the time you read this. The major change is the
reinstatement of bandwidth limiting, in order to try to eliminate it as
a major cause of network brokenness. This may well lead to a significant
degradation
Administrative note: in future announcements of unstable builds will
only go to the devl and tech lists, please subscribe to one of those
lists if you run unstable.
Freenet unstable build 6433 is now available.
Changelog:
* Fixed a major bug that was causing connections to be incapable of
Stable build 5054 is now available. The snapshots have been updated.
Download it from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar
or use freenet-webinstall.exe or update.sh to upgrade. Source is also
available at
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-stable-latest.src.tar.bz2 .
Freenet stable build 5055 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users
Freenet stable build 5055 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:10:03PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Running build 5055 on Linux 2.6.1 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 and Y threads.
Just completed a Fuqid download but FEC decoding failed with this trace:
Fixed in 5056.
13.01.2004 22:10:44 (freenet.node.Node, YThread-75, ERROR): Error
Freenet stable build 5058 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:24:17AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
After months of struggling, complaints, frayed tempers and dead-ends, I
think the current Freenet release is a major step forward.
Everyone involved should give themselves a pat on the back and take a
moment to celebrate - the war
Just download the one with the JVM...
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:42:27AM -0800, Bill Haley wrote:
Hello, I would like to download and run freenet
software but I'm given the option of dl'ing the
software with or without Java 1.4.1.
How can I determine what version of Java I am
currently
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:32:38PM -, Kevin Bennett wrote:
I see on the web interface page:
Build: 5058 (Latest: 5060)
freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar still has the same timestamp
as when 5058 came out (13-Jan-2004 18:20)
I don't see any 5060 nodes in the OCM or node
seednodes ?!?)
*scratches head* i see no sense in the current noderef politics.
I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not
at all sure those node are all stable (have my doubts).
[Original Message]
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
noderef politics.
I am running stable with 5058. I got the new node set at 5054, but I'm not
at all sure those node are all stable (have my doubts).
[Original Message]
From: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 1/14/2004 3:16
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:43:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
then wrong noderefs can only slip into the rt when the local rt already h=
as these bad references (e.g. when switching von unstable-stable or the ot=
her way around without purging the rt) or when importing new=20
seednodes
I don't know. I don't personally vouch for every last bit of code...
Many others contribute to the code.. We cannot establish very much trust
in it anyhow, something might have gone into CVS without a CVS mail
being generated, the CVS-mail generated might not have been noticed yet,
or the change
, 2004 at 08:08:07PM +, Toad wrote:
We need more sources of seednodes for the new stable branch. Please mail
me with the URL to fetch seednodes from. It must be accessible from
dodo.freenetproject.org (by IP), but it need not be visible to the rest
of the internet. You can do this by setting
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote:
I am getting some of these:
Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does it provide a stack trace?
Got a trailer chunk ahead of our time!: message starts 6880, stream
currently at 0 from [EMAIL
Thank you.
The actual version of the software was 0.4. We are way behind 1.0, let
alone 4.0.
The current officially released version is 0.5.2, which you can get from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.tar.gz (for *nix), or
Freenet stable build 5061 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Someone wrote:
Hi,
at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but
it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, high CPU
and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading
What CPU do you have? How much
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:27:46PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
Hi,
at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but
it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log,
What kind of errors ?
high CPU
and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
Niklas Bergh schrieb:
Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1
one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can
download it.
Seems to be only 1.3.1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:28PM +0100, Someone wrote:
Herve Lefebvre schrieb:
Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows.
Well maybe there will be one in the future.
But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I
tried it
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:17:14PM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
I think anyone who regularly browses Freenet is going to destroy their
node's specialisation. Not really a big problem since it means popular
content is available from more places in the network. Also, recent
changes (in 5061) to
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:50:55AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
This puzzles me. The win installer has worked without a hitch (except to
ask you to shut down freenet) as long as I've used it. The only difference
I've seen recently is twice (not always) reporting a failure to complete a
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:39:55AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
Yet a couple...
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 621 (576/45/956)
Number of distinct nodes connected 507
Okay, so it's definitely not that the network is that small - either
it's a limited-horizons problem, or more
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:08:30PM -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
On 18 Jan 2004 at 5:24, S wrote:
Anyone can change the latest build number by editing Version.java and
compiling the source on their machine. If you were so inclined, you
could change your latest build number to and
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:31:26PM +, Russell Hedger wrote:
I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying and
then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my node
updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more often
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying
and
then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my
node
updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:16:33AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
Anyone else seeing a decline in the number of contactable nodes in the
routing table?
My node seems to be dropping the most backed-off entries (CP=0.0), but
retaining the entries which can't be contacted (CP=1.0).
Wrong way
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:33:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I found a doc about freenet and have been these last days trying
to connect. The program installed without any problem. I installed the
version who comes with Java. After some minutes
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:51:32AM +0100, Someone wrote:
After more experiments with the node it seems like it needs way
more memory than I can give it. I stopped all other services running
on the machine and give fred the whole 192 MB that were not needed
by windows. With this it managed to
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:35:00AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
I would suggest the project leader Ian Clarke,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] He will most likely read your mail very soon.
:)
It seems this email adress is invalid.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct address.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's odd, there's no obvious reason it should use much CPU, and the
previous builds didn't generally... what's your bandwidth?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 10:39:26PM +0100, Peter Nilsson wrote:
Hi All
I have been using unstable for some time but for some time by system
don't work any
What happens when you try to insert? The usual very very very long
verification times?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:09:54AM +0100, Newsbyte wrote:
Limerick ;-)
I would like to put it on my Freesite 'Newsbyte's Flimsy Flog' too, but, alas... :-)
There once was a new Freenet node,
to
Freenet stable build 5062 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users
Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar
from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable
branch users
Sorry, I announced this slightly prematurely. The snapshots have been
updated now.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:55:34PM +, Toad wrote:
Freenet stable build 5063 is now available. The snapshots have been
updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use
the freenet
You mean from the web interface?
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html - as it always
has been.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:13:26PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
where is the routing table in 5063?
with regards,
Max Moritz Sievers
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL
Nothing important. IT means your node is pretty severely CPU overloaded,
probably. It will be a lower visibility in future builds.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:57:26PM +0100, Arne Teichmann wrote:
Just saw that in my log, what does it mean?
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 10 in queue, 2473
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Toad
Sent: 22 January 2004 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet stable build 5063
Your numbers are amazing, and far higher than mine or those of another
node I've been able
20:41:51 +
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean from the web interface?
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html - as it always
has been.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:13:26PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
where is the routing table in 5063?
with regards
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:30:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current seednodes.ref is 5.6Mb, filled with
this kind of lines
Estimator.erTransferSuccess.Store.7.Key=69888e24fa0323034be788eac1b82cf1dab6c6b4701f40
Estimator.erTransferSuccess.Store.7.Time=dd4
I crash my stable node; is
Two things:
1. Does anyone know where the scripts used for the old watchme server
are?
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU, memory and maybe even disk, although of course we'd be using mysql
or similar
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:27:19AM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:27:55PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
Toad wrote:
2. Does anyone have a suitable server for a watchme/testnet testbed?
This would probably have to be a fairly beefy machine, on bandwidth,
CPU
Bandwidth?
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:52:36PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
No.
Nikita.
Toad wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:49:14PM -0500, Nikita Proskourine wrote:
I run freenet on Windows from command line and JRE caps memory usage at
64MB. And FreeNet still works great
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 11:59:57AM -0500, Stefano Santoro wrote:
Hi,
please take me off immediately from your subscription service.
Consider this february donation the last one. This means I
have donated to you 60 dollars so far, when I really meant
donating only 20. I would consider a
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:18:49AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
It is an effect of a connection being closed quite immediately after it
was opened. Could we move the enqueueing of the identify message a
little while later?
No. Identify has to be the first message sent. It's logged at NORMAL
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 01:02:45PM +0100, Daniele wrote:
Hi!
I've downoloaded freenet some days ago. I istalled it on two machines:
one is running Windows XP, the other is running Linux Mandrake 9.2.
I've encountered some problems in both the installations.
In Windows XP i've correctly
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:06:46PM +0100, Max Moritz Sievers wrote:
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:16, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
Toad,
Since re-introducing NGR into stable at least my node has grinded almost
to a halt with similar symptoms. A very small amount of connections,
almost none
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious
causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's
a problem with RNFs
Freenet unstable build 6463 is now available. The snapshots will have
been updated in the next few minutes. The main change in this build is
to fix the per-node links on the routing table page. This should help us
understand what is going on with routing.
PS I *STRONGLY* recommend ANYONE running
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:57:00AM +0100, privacy.at Anonymous Remailer wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 04:20:05AM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Running build 6468 on Linux 2.6.2 with Blackdown-1.4.2-rc1 VM,
I get lots of temp-*-1-* files in store/temp which don't go
away after being closed.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:04:34AM -0500, An Metet wrote:
I have tried time and time again to get freenet running only to be met with
one frustration after another.
The last version of freenet that worked and actually allowed me to retrieve
freesites and frost content was build 5017.
1 - 100 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
