[freenet-support] Routing Table Corrupt

2002-10-29 Thread Wayne McDougall
Greetings. This morning I found a message Routing Table corrupt. Remote RT files and restart. I'm new - onyl been up 36 hours. I don't know where the RT files are or how to remove them. I've downloaded and installed 5.0.1 choosing to keep my settings. That didn't help. I'd appreciate some

[freenet-support] Nodeconfig crashes in Windows 5074 and 5075

2004-03-17 Thread Wayne McDougall
Title: Message Nodeconfig.exe crashes under Windows...I think this started with 5074 and is definitely present in 5075. NodeConfig MFC Application has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. It always truncates my Freenet.ini at the same place so the

[freenet-support] Re: freenet gateway pages

2004-05-16 Thread Wayne McDougall
Francis GUDIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dans gmane.network.freenet.support, vous avez crit: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Are there any currently working Freenet gateways anywhere? I'm experimenting some and would like to be able to attempt retrieving my test

[freenet-support] Re: freenet gateway pages

2004-05-18 Thread Wayne McDougall
Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I just tested and https://freenet.mixmaster.it:4433/servlet/nodeinfo/ is working https://freenet.thing.net/ usually works - doesn't seem to be responding at the moment but worth trying again later. It was back up again last time I checked

[freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Wayne McDougall
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What would be nice (in lieu of being able to prefer certain IP ranges - I get local traffic far cheaper) would be a way to limit monthly transfer, eg set it so the node can use 5GB/month, and it'll aim for a daily transfer of about 170MB, but will

[freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Wayne McDougall
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One thing that I can think of is limiting the size of incoming files not requested by the node directly - stop splitfiles and things going through. I'm more interested in the information, not movies, but I can't think of a tidy way to implement

[freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Perhaps. That would also lead to high message send times though. Freenet needs to know what the limit is even if you use external limiting. Fair enough. But given shared bandwidth needs shouldn't

[freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-24 Thread Wayne McDougall
TLD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is message send time a problem? I mean, AFAIK freenet is able to recognize links with higher latency and use them as little as possible, thus reducing the outbound traffic over those links in favour of local (=not-so-limited) nodes. I think message send time IS

[freenet-support] Re: averagebandwidthlimit results

2004-05-25 Thread Wayne McDougall
Phillip Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, I enabled an average[input|output]bandwidthlimit of 500. In 5 hours I've transferred 400MiB of data, which is still far too high, considering that I should be transferring 288MiB each way per day (which is also too high). The average is

[freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-25 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 05:04:53AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Not terribly well, because of high level bandwidth limiting. The node needs to know how much bandwidth is available to estimate how much is being used and therefore how many queries to allow

[freenet-support] Re: messageSendTimeRequest

2004-05-28 Thread Wayne McDougall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. ... So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? Forgive me if this is too obvious, but I had the same problem

[freenet-support] Error - unable to recover from out of memory

2004-06-11 Thread Wayne McDougall
Submitted in the hope it may be of some help/interest. Please advise if you require more information: 11/06/2004 09:33:55 (freenet.transport.tcpConnection, Finalizer, NORMAL): finalized without being closed!tcp/connection: 213.156.52.103:1892local,[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/06/2004 09:34:01

[freenet-support] Re: Error - unable to recover from out of memory

2004-06-11 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What build of Freenet? How much memory in the machine? Did you try to reduce the memory limit? Are you running on Windows? If you are running on *nix, please send your start-freenet.sh .. if you are running on Windows, there's an equivalent issue with direct

[freenet-support] Re: Current data store size in web interface?

2004-07-10 Thread Wayne McDougall
Weiliang Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is that any place that shows the current data store size in the web interface? Internals*Environment Data Store section http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/internal/env Data Store

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations

2004-07-11 Thread Wayne McDougall
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple days after that I increased the

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-12 Thread Wayne McDougall
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits connection (based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity). You would want to adjust

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-12 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits, and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under control. It works very well for those of us

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-14 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:00:16AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: fproxy will timeout and then I have to start again. And then it won't even grab the parts it previously downloaded successfully So over a period of weeks my perception is that I eventually move

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-14 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work at all on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression that you expect Freenet to require

[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5086 and major vulnerability fix

2004-07-23 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stable build 5086 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. I've still been getting 5085 for the last 3 hours using the update option on the start menu under Windows. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] Re: new stable

2004-07-26 Thread Wayne McDougall
vinyl1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Every time we download a new release, we hope this will be the one and all the content will zip to our machines with lightening speed. Ok, forgive me if this has been discussed before (and please point me to this discussion), but I've been wondering what are

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet causing crashes...

2004-08-18 Thread Wayne McDougall
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 02:11:40PM -0400, Don Gregory wrote: Anybody else here have any trouble with Freenet running on XP SP2? I know SP2 is still a bit new to most people, and it's a HUGE service pack, weighing in at over 260M, and it screws with hundreds of system files, so

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet causing crashes...

2004-08-20 Thread Wayne McDougall
Don Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's good to know. Thanks. In the event log, does the message say TCP/IP has reached the security limit imposed on the number of concurrent TCP connect attempts.? Cuz if so, that's the 10 half-open connection thing I mentioned in an earlier post. So

[freenet-support] 23 Gb log file

2004-08-29 Thread Wayne McDougall
jer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OS: Linux 2.6 (Slackware 10) Java: SUN 1.4.2_04 freenet-ver: 5092 Network: NAT translated. I've just set up a new freenet instance ( after a HD krash of my old, no backup...) but now when it's running it fills up my log with the messages below and no data is

[freenet-support] Re: Request for assistance (CPU time)

2004-10-12 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi. We have recently been running a number of simulations of Freenet, to try to: a) Show that it can work. b) Show that NGR can work. c) Find out what HTLs will be required. d) Find out if different options (e.g. probabilistic caching, estimator smoothing)

[freenet-support] Re: Data store wiped - 11 Gb gone.

2004-10-12 Thread Wayne McDougall
Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Niklas schrieb: Can you put them on a web server or so? I would like to see what kind of error that caused the index file corruption. /N I disabled the index some months ago, because it got corrupt whenever I killed the java process while it

[freenet-support] Data store wiped - 11 Gb gone.

2004-10-09 Thread Wayne McDougall
On checking the environment I see my data store was wiped. Down from 11+ Gb when I lasted check to less than 700 Mb. I haven't looked at the logs because I don't know if anyone cares, and I wouldn't know what to look for. But I'd be happy to do so if anyone has an interest in this and wants to

[freenet-support] Re: Data store wiped - 11 Gb gone.

2004-10-09 Thread Wayne McDougall
Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On checking the environment I see my data store was wiped. Down from 11+ Gb when I lasted check to less than 700 Mb. Sorry to follow up my own message. The data would still seem to be in the folders: 13.9 GB (14,976,513,449 bytes) as the size

[freenet-support] Re: Data store wiped - 11 Gb gone.

2004-10-09 Thread Wayne McDougall
Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Shut down the node, delete the 'index' file from the store-folder then restart the node. Please let us know if this worked for you? (and please make a copy of the logs so we can inspect them later on) That worked, thank you. My 15 Gb (it had been some days

[freenet-support] Re: Data store wiped - 11 Gb gone.

2004-10-09 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Any chance of doing some doIndex=true vs doIndex=false benchmarks on different platforms? Can we just set it to false by default? I'm happy to volunteer Windows XP SP2 if that is of any help. Always happy to help.

[freenet-support] 5098 Errors sendingPacket == null!

2004-10-23 Thread Wayne McDougall
Running 5098 on Windows XP SP2 768 Mb RAM More information available on request. The node is non-responsive. From Recent Logs 19:47:04jobDone(160,true) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] but sendingPacket == null! - 19:48:52resetting - 19:48:52jobDone(160,true) on [EMAIL

[freenet-support] Re: 5098 Errors sendingPacket == null!

2004-10-23 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Argh. As usual it doesn't happen for me, so I can't fix it : OK I'm now half way through Java - an introduction (although I ahd to return it to the library today), and I got Hello World to compile and run, so just tell me what I can do to help. I think my

[freenet-support] Still more 5098 errors

2004-10-23 Thread Wayne McDougall
07:11:19Delete failed on bucket t3fc3294c - 07:11:33Delete failed on bucket t79711c65 - 07:11:33Delete failed on bucket t61e9b552 - 07:12:53Delete failed on bucket t6e6751c8 - 07:13:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:freenet: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL

[freenet-support] Yet more 5098 errors

2004-10-23 Thread Wayne McDougall
07:39:51Got a TWCM that was not finished!: freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:false for [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 3e7b78f261d6d1b4: 3e7b78f261d6d1b4/1cf7832e75b60ba1: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=28005, written=353556, closed=true, writingPacket=true, ready=false,

[freenet-support] Yet another 5098 error

2004-10-23 Thread Wayne McDougall
15:34:21State does not receive: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DataInsert @[EMAIL PROTECTED] @ da5f10cb49eaa14e: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: freenet.node.states.request.TransferReply.receivedMessage(freenet.node.Node, freenet.message.DataInsert) ___

[freenet-support] Re: 5098 Errors sendingPacket == null!

2004-10-24 Thread Wayne McDougall
Niklas Bergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, it seems to have started getting better now.. I haven't seen any of those messages for a while in the log. No better for me. Last one in the log was less than 2 hours ago. 9:01:13 AM (freenet.MuxConnectionHandler, Network writing thread,

[freenet-support] 5099 Errors Please close() me manually in finalizer and Got a TWCM that was not finished!

2004-10-26 Thread Wayne McDougall
20:18:47Got a TWCM that was not finished!: freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:true:false for [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ d4cf7f176cb38016: d4cf7f176cb38016/4926c6d20ff8833c: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=12634, written=258612, closed=true, writingPacket=true, ready=false,

[freenet-support] Re: More 5099 errors - unhandled throwable, unhandled exception

2004-10-27 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you show the full stack trace for the NPE in another mail? Short answer no. Long answer: I'm guessing a full stack trace shows up in the freenet.log file, rather than the potted summary from the Recent log entries through the web interface. I'm guessing that

[freenet-support] Yet more 5099 errors - Removing freenet.node.QueueManager$QueueElement

2004-10-28 Thread Wayne McDougall
Oct 28, 2004 9:46:38 PM (freenet.node.QueueManager, Network reading thread, ERROR): Removing [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=4348be1270612083, expiresAt=1098953188062 (-10219 ms), [EMAIL PROTECTED] DataRequest @null @ 4348be1270612083, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@4348be1270612083,true@

[freenet-support] Re: Yet more 5099 errors - Removing freenet.node.QueueManager$QueueElement

2004-10-28 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did you have CPU overload (persistent 100% CPU usage) at the time? That's the most likely explanation... Yup, I discovered that after posting. Someone had started a game, and left it running... Sorry for bothering you.

[freenet-support] Re: a dead horse and other animals

2004-11-25 Thread Wayne McDougall
1. Newsbyte: keep stirring things up. I find it helpful. 2. With respect I don't think you can both a) claim to be installing like a novice user and b) insist on keeping your existing Java install to be used and recognised. IMO the average novice user will choose the full install with Java and

[freenet-support] Re: a dead horse and other animals

2004-11-26 Thread Wayne McDougall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 3. And for those who have some slight knowledge and do want to run / keep the latest Java with a Windows install they can follow the instructions at: http://wikiserver.freenethelp.org:14741/InstallingFreenet That's entertaining. ... Glad you were