At 22.26 05/01/03 +, you wrote:
btw my ./freenet/freenet/store_*/temp dir is empty, and I do not regularl=
y=20
delete the files manually.
Not surprising. It is cleaned out on node startup.
It is not so simple; all 4 nodes I run (539 to 629) had 100Mb or more
in temp dir that never goes
Till 8 GMT 2002 01 08, I'm unable to
fetch TFE CRUFT from freenet.
I'm using 537, 539, 541 641 on 5
nodes.
Only FF is ok.
Other sites seems to be still there, but how retrieve it if
TFE is not working ?
I bet that most of freenetters have no link
to freesites, but only to TFE.
Maybe
From build 649 all site I access (including
TFE ang many others) are reduced to plaint
text withount any image or link.
There is some setting to do in freenet.conf to
configure/disable filtering ?
Thx. Marco
--
+ il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+
* the
At 19.26 13/01/03 +0100, you wrote:
Have a look at the fproxy tab of the configurator...
I'm from the Linux side, no tab at all
and no java compiler in place too,
just plain C .
Ciao. Marco
___
support mailing list
[EMAIL
Im' inserting a freesite with files 1 mb
using 549 FIW 0.04b
All site insert OK, and can be retrieved, but when I try to retrieve
a FEC file, it give me all gray an red cross,
and is not able to retrieve even a single block.
This happen also if I attempt to retrieve from the node
I used
During the attempt of retrieving FEC files inserted
with 549 FIW 0.04b, ( I cannot retrieve any block
not even if the block is in the local datastore),
I found a lot of those messages in console
[root@tatooine root]# cat x
PARANOID CHK CHECK FAILED!
expected:
At 00.57 03/02/03 +, you wrote:
Re [freenet-support] freesite .emsfile://D:\Mail\Attach\Re [freenet-support]
freesite .ems 0880.0002
Personally I have never used Frost mainly because it uses Swing, which
I'm using FIW, a swing application, with Kaffe 1.0.7, with only some
warning
It would be nice that during a FEC download, aborting
the healing phase automatically save the file.
Now if you abort the healing the download is lost.
JM2C. Marco
--
+ il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco+
* the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit
At 19.34 05/02/03 -0500, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Anyway, till Freenet remains in java, dropping the Kaffe
compatibility IMHO is a fundamental mistake, both from
the point of view of free software and from the security.
What exactly do you mean by Kaffe
At 18.46 06/02/03 +, you wrote:
Re [freenet-support] Re [Free4.emsfile://D:\Mail\Attach\Re [freenet-support] Re
[Free4.ems 0880.0002
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:26:35PM -0800, AARG!Anonymous wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scriveva:
=20
is happy to run on build 552; it is slow because run on a
At 02.45 11/02/03 -0500, you wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:07, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Build 611? Are you sure about that? I have made contact with
(unstable) nodes with build numbers as high as 663.
Are you also seeing your problem with the stable builds?
Sorry for the typo... that should
11 matches
Mail list logo
