Quoting Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive
criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's first impression can be
enhanced. Topics include installation, FProxy, even the website's layout.
freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:57:49 +, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If Freenet isn't installed,
a redirection to http://freenet.sf.net where the download links are
more prominently displayed.
We have debated the whole freenet:xxx thing before and
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:33 +, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just how are you trying to get people to visit such links? Verbally? If
Thanks for calling Freenet advocates idiots - but the reaction is more
pity from my side than anything else. http://localhost:; is what
people
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 20:05:52 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one change in this build relative to 5047 is to fix a bug that was
causing the browser warning to not be sent if the user configured Opera
to identify as itself. We do check for Opera and IE, because by default
Opera ignores
,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:28:58 +0800, Stupid C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
as i know, current Freenet cannot be searched yet.
Freenet is just as searchable as the regular world wide web.
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense
join in again :) I guess the situation I ended
up with now is the same as for new nodes - and as Toad pointed out - that
needs to be fixed ASAP.
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 9:52:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Things don't seem to be as straight forward on a windows machine. For
linux update, I just ran update.sh. What the heck to do I do to update
on a windows machine? Sorry for the dumb question, but I can't find any
simple
that over your
existing seednodes.ref and restart the node). There are likely to be
Does this mean that the stable and unstable networks have merged?
The first thing I got after upgrading and reseeding was the active links
for Cofe and DFI - and neither were in stable as far as I know.
regards,
Troed
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:17:04 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main change in this build is that multiplexing has been merged
after
weeks of development and testing. The network has been reset, so you
will need to reseed from
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref (save that
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:36:38 -0500, Paul Derbyshire
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lastly, is this port being exposed to the Internet going to pose
a security risk, or is the fproxy service reasonably robust against
the usual things, e.g. buffer overflow exploits. The only thing I can
That's
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:56:22 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may redistribute, repackage, and modify freenet as much as you like
under the terms of the GNU General Public License;
I've thought about this since yesterday's mail debate regarding signatures:
Freenet will fail its purpose
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:44:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
number of RNFs and increases the chance of finding data, but it may also
increase the overall network load.. we may have taken it too far in the
other direction in 5060. The only local cost is that it may take longer
for requests
? There are seemingly almost no messages
posted to Frost either, which would support that you are ..
regards,
Troed
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious
causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's
a problem with RNFs, and all I can say is we are working on it on
unstable with the new
amount of data transferred9 MiB
No one in my routing table is usig 5066 .. are they incompatible versions?
(If I'm the only one experiencing this problem I'll start checking things
here, but all I did was to update Freenet)
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 12:53:38 +0100, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No one in my routing table is usig 5066 .. are they incompatible
versions?
Yes, you have to reseed your node. Please read toads message again ;-).
Ah :) I always skip down to the details on what has been changed. Never
speeds are up to 11kb/s.
The Freenet node and contents are the same, I moved system behind my NAT
so the Freenet network knows nothing of my change - it's all internal.
I find the above very interesting .. comments from others?
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common
on
the previous machine.
What surprised me was how transparent Freenet suddenly became, the
difference is huge - something I cannot really justify looking at how much
memory the old machine had and the CPU clock difference being only 3.5x.
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common
but not getting
anything (fast, at least) and then closing everything down?
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in
insert
thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
This is strange. Why is FUQID trying to
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber.
Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug
report.
My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last
stable builds have
haven't done extensive browsing since
the last version. I'll do that this evening and report the results, but I
have had no problems at all inserting 30-40Mb with ok speeds recently
with FUQID, as an example.
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense
, but, than I'm starting to wonder what the
point of using Freenet for this would be at all.
regards,
Troed - not an official Freenet spokesperson in any way - but considered
quite knowledgeable about privacy.
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:08:55 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wrong. It's quite possible to interface to freenet on the FNP level.
Have a look at freenet/client/FNPClient.java .
... in effect, creating an applet-Fred? But without a datastore and
history, how would those integrate with the
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella,
fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but
downloading is quite decent. Bittorrent seems to have zero problems
saturating upstream
On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:51:20 -0400, Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Fred takes too much CPU and RAM because it's written in Java.
I hate this depate.
It's true that object orienting uses up (a few) more bytes than non-OO
programming, but that's trivial compared to the structuring you
On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's either not that speed, or not DSL!
ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but
slower for download (up=down)...
Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps!
Wrong list
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:48:20 +0200, Newsbyte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tell me what you think about it:
http://www.freenethelp.org/bux
He looks stoned.
A bit like Freenet itself - nice :)
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT), MICHAEL BAKEMAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fuck the brits, free speach is what you make of it. Europe doesn't
know what free speach is. In my opinion, this idea will be forced upon
the
europeans by time.
I seriously hope you're kidding. There's more free
Saw this on /. - thought it might interest someone. Especially the part
about using the server JVM instead of client JVM when speed is an issue
(i.e, if you have plenty of ram but you feel Freenet use too much CPU)
http://www3.sys-con.com/java/rotate2.cfm
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se -
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:21:19 +0200, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To say it clear, a fixed IP (even when it is only fixed for a week) is
something
special you have to pay for in germany, and no ISP will give you
something for
free if he can actually charge a good ammount of extra money
.
On the other hand, I don't live in the Fascist states of America. (See
link for explanation)
http://troed.se/index.php?subaction=showcommentsid=1091214452
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
) they
transport aren't their responsibility.
*knocks on head*
See world.
See world outside USA.
See world outside USA lots lots bigger.
See people don't care about USA.
regards,
Troed
(this is the last I'll write here about this. You'll find me at various
places over the net when you want to be lectured
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:20:24 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you run a freenet node you know it's doing something illegal
No. I've already explained this to you. Short memory?
Do you get paid to post FUD?
___/
_/
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And as I explained one does not need 100% certain knowledge of a crime
to fit the legal requirement of knowing. It only needs to be proven
that you had a good reason to suspect that it is so.
The very fact
not as
good as 5084 or thereabouts) - so is this strictly a problem of me
accessing the node locally?
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:57:14 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other reports say it is working okay... Do you get RNFs?
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:29:43PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote:
Symptoms: Very little content browseable outside what I suspect is in my
local datastore, but some content
(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:207)
at
freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler.handle(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:99)
at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:325)
at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:285)
regards,
Troed
--
http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:20:40 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the seednodes, so upgrading should be relatively uneventful. You may be
able to use the update utility on Windows, or update.sh on Linux. If
this does not work, for example if your node connects to zero nodes
after startup, download
40 matches
Mail list logo
