Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-10-31 Thread troed
Quoting Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's first impression can be enhanced. Topics include installation, FProxy, even the website's layout. freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If

Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-10-31 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:57:49 +, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If Freenet isn't installed, a redirection to http://freenet.sf.net where the download links are more prominently displayed. We have debated the whole freenet:xxx thing before and

Re: [freenet-dev] Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2003-10-31 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:33 +, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just how are you trying to get people to visit such links? Verbally? If Thanks for calling Freenet advocates idiots - but the reaction is more pity from my side than anything else. http://localhost:; is what people

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5048

2003-12-03 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 20:05:52 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The one change in this build relative to 5047 is to fix a bug that was causing the browser warning to not be sent if the user configured Opera to identify as itself. We do check for Opera and IE, because by default Opera ignores

Re: [freenet-support] Is there a user forum anywhere

2003-12-08 Thread Troed Sngberg
, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

Re: [freenet-support] how many existing ways to announce a new Freesite?

2003-12-10 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:28:58 +0800, Stupid C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as i know, current Freenet cannot be searched yet. Freenet is just as searchable as the regular world wide web. regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense

Re: Status report and request for help was Re: [freenet-support] Request for help: Seednodes harvesting notworking well

2003-12-31 Thread Troed Sngberg
join in again :) I guess the situation I ended up with now is the same as for new nodes - and as Toad pointed out - that needs to be fixed ASAP. regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] How to update on a Windows machine??

2004-01-01 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 9:52:02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Things don't seem to be as straight forward on a windows machine. For linux update, I just ran update.sh. What the heck to do I do to update on a windows machine? Sorry for the dumb question, but I can't find any simple

Re: [freenet-support] Stable Build 5054: Multiplexing merged!

2004-01-13 Thread Troed Sngberg
that over your existing seednodes.ref and restart the node). There are likely to be Does this mean that the stable and unstable networks have merged? The first thing I got after upgrading and reseeding was the active links for Cofe and DFI - and neither were in stable as far as I know. regards, Troed

Re: [freenet-support] Stable Build 5054: Multiplexing merged!

2004-01-14 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:17:04 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main change in this build is that multiplexing has been merged after weeks of development and testing. The network has been reset, so you will need to reseed from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/seednodes.ref (save that

Re: [freenet-support] New node not working...500 server error from 127.0.0.1:8888.

2004-01-15 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:36:38 -0500, Paul Derbyshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lastly, is this port being exposed to the Internet going to pose a security risk, or is the fproxy service reasonably robust against the usual things, e.g. buffer overflow exploits. The only thing I can That's

Re: [freenet-support] Request for including your software in our database

2004-01-15 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:56:22 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You may redistribute, repackage, and modify freenet as much as you like under the terms of the GNU General Public License; I've thought about this since yesterday's mail debate regarding signatures: Freenet will fail its purpose

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5061

2004-01-18 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:44:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: number of RNFs and increases the chance of finding data, but it may also increase the overall network load.. we may have taken it too far in the other direction in 5060. The only local cost is that it may take longer for requests

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Troed Sngberg
? There are seemingly almost no messages posted to Frost either, which would support that you are .. regards, Troed ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin

Re: [freenet-support] Problems with linux and windows xp

2004-02-04 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:02:41 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any incoming connections? Please can we eliminate the obvious causes first especially as others say it's not that bad? I know there's a problem with RNFs, and all I can say is we are working on it on unstable with the new

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5066 - stable branch network reset, merged rate limiting

2004-02-08 Thread Troed Sngberg
amount of data transferred9 MiB No one in my routing table is usig 5066 .. are they incompatible versions? (If I'm the only one experiencing this problem I'll start checking things here, but all I did was to update Freenet) regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5066 - stable branch network reset, merged rate limiting

2004-02-08 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 12:53:38 +0100, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No one in my routing table is usig 5066 .. are they incompatible versions? Yes, you have to reseed your node. Please read toads message again ;-). Ah :) I always skip down to the details on what has been changed. Never

[freenet-support] Interesting observations regarding performance

2004-02-18 Thread Troed Sngberg
speeds are up to 11kb/s. The Freenet node and contents are the same, I moved system behind my NAT so the Freenet network knows nothing of my change - it's all internal. I find the above very interesting .. comments from others? regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common

Re: [freenet-support] Interesting observations regarding performance

2004-02-18 Thread Troed Sngberg
on the previous machine. What surprised me was how transparent Freenet suddenly became, the difference is huge - something I cannot really justify looking at how much memory the old machine had and the CPU clock difference being only 3.5x. regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5073

2004-03-03 Thread Troed Sngberg
but not getting anything (fast, at least) and then closing everything down? regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings

2004-03-09 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:31 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25 [2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061 This is strange. Why is FUQID trying to

Re: [freenet-support] slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:37:34 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4. The last 3 or 4+ builds have gotten slower and dumber. Why thank you for that informative, empirically backed and helpful bug report. My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last stable builds have

Re: [freenet-support] slowdom in freeville

2004-03-10 Thread Troed Sngberg
haven't done extensive browsing since the last version. I'll do that this evening and report the results, but I have had no problems at all inserting 30-40Mb with ok speeds recently with FUQID, as an example. regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense

Re: [freenet-support] CS Project

2004-03-26 Thread Troed Sngberg
, but, than I'm starting to wonder what the point of using Freenet for this would be at all. regards, Troed - not an official Freenet spokesperson in any way - but considered quite knowledgeable about privacy. -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense

Re: [freenet-support] CS Project

2004-03-26 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:08:55 +, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wrong. It's quite possible to interface to freenet on the FNP level. Have a look at freenet/client/FNPClient.java . ... in effect, creating an applet-Fred? But without a datastore and history, how would those integrate with the

Re: [freenet-support] NAT Freenet

2004-04-27 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:41:56 -0700, Galen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was thinking of P2P file transfer protocols. Bittorrent, gnutella, fasttrack, etc. Uploading doesn't always work really great, but downloading is quite decent. Bittorrent seems to have zero problems saturating upstream

Re: [freenet-support] Re: [freenet-dev] Retiring from the project

2004-05-25 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Tue, 25 May 2004 10:51:20 -0400, Jay Oliveri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Fred takes too much CPU and RAM because it's written in Java. I hate this depate. It's true that object orienting uses up (a few) more bytes than non-OO programming, but that's trivial compared to the structuring you

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?

2004-05-29 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Fri, 28 May 2004 18:39:14 -0400, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's either not that speed, or not DSL! ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but slower for download (up=down)... Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps! Wrong list

Re: [freenet-support] Mascotte! :-)

2004-06-03 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:48:20 +0200, Newsbyte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tell me what you think about it: http://www.freenethelp.org/bux He looks stoned. A bit like Freenet itself - nice :) ___/ _/ -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense?

Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship ofWeb sites

2004-06-07 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT), MICHAEL BAKEMAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fuck the brits, free speach is what you make of it. Europe doesn't know what free speach is. In my opinion, this idea will be forced upon the europeans by time. I seriously hope you're kidding. There's more free

[freenet-support] How to speed up Java

2004-06-15 Thread Troed Sngberg
Saw this on /. - thought it might interest someone. Especially the part about using the server JVM instead of client JVM when speed is an issue (i.e, if you have plenty of ram but you feel Freenet use too much CPU) http://www3.sys-con.com/java/rotate2.cfm ___/ _/ -- http://troed.se -

Re: [freenet-support] Re: RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:21:19 +0200, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To say it clear, a fixed IP (even when it is only fixed for a week) is something special you have to pay for in germany, and no ISP will give you something for free if he can actually charge a good ammount of extra money

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Troed Sngberg
. On the other hand, I don't live in the Fascist states of America. (See link for explanation) http://troed.se/index.php?subaction=showcommentsid=1091214452 regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-04 Thread Troed Sngberg
) they transport aren't their responsibility. *knocks on head* See world. See world outside USA. See world outside USA lots lots bigger. See people don't care about USA. regards, Troed (this is the last I'll write here about this. You'll find me at various places over the net when you want to be lectured

Re: [freenet-support] RE: anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-05 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:20:24 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you run a freenet node you know it's doing something illegal No. I've already explained this to you. Short memory? Do you get paid to post FUD? ___/ _/ -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common

Re: [freenet-support] RE: anonymity(NOT)

2004-08-05 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And as I explained one does not need 100% certain knowledge of a crime to fit the legal requirement of knowing. It only needs to be proven that you had a good reason to suspect that it is so. The very fact

[freenet-support] 5091 not doing well?

2004-08-13 Thread Troed Sngberg
not as good as 5084 or thereabouts) - so is this strictly a problem of me accessing the node locally? regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org

Re: [freenet-support] 5091 not doing well?

2004-08-17 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:57:14 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Other reports say it is working okay... Do you get RNFs? On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:29:43PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote: Symptoms: Very little content browseable outside what I suspect is in my local datastore, but some content

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5095

2004-09-05 Thread Troed Sngberg
(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:207) at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler.handle(StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:99) at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:325) at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:285) regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5099, network reset, please upgrade

2004-10-26 Thread Troed Sngberg
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:20:40 +0100, Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the seednodes, so upgrading should be relatively uneventful. You may be able to use the update utility on Windows, or update.sh on Linux. If this does not work, for example if your node connects to zero nodes after startup, download