On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:58:45PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Thanks for the response anyway. :-) And don't feel bad about your ignorance
in certain areas. Most of us are still learning as we go here. :-)
Including me! There's plenty of parts of the code that I'm not familiar
with, and I
Thanks for all the confusion.
Perhaps unstable could be named the Linux Freenet and leave the stable as
Freenet. And the indexes aren't really of much value to Freenet currently
in any case. Or perhaps both could be rename Broadband Freenet and not
confuse the rest of us into exploring any of
On 05-Apr-2004 Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Thanks for all the confusion.
Perhaps unstable could be named the Linux Freenet and leave the stable as
Freenet. And the indexes aren't really of much value to Freenet currently
in any case. Or perhaps both could be rename Broadband Freenet and not
On 02-Apr-2004 Nicholas Sturm wrote:
I wish I could answer you, but I have no idea what you are talking about.
Sorry. Much here is not clear to those that have not been worth the
developed throughout it's complete evolution.
Converting the site to use a container simply means that I've
On 04-Apr-2004 Troed Sångberg wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:58:45 -0600 (CST), Conrad Sabatier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most of them into a zip file. This helps in two ways: 1) The zipped
container
is much smaller than the combined original, uncompressed files, making
for
faster
PROTECTED]
Cc: Freenet support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 3/31/2004 8:48:42 PM
Subject: [freenet-support] DFI: New container version just inserted today
I'd be very interested to know what sort of difference this makes for
people
when downloading DFI. The old, non-container version
I'd be very interested to know what sort of difference this makes for people
when downloading DFI. The old, non-container version consisted of roughly 400
Kbytes of files. The new, zipped container is only about 64 K (I left
activelink.png and description.txt out of the container for the sake of
