>Doesn't happen here. Maybe an SVN/compiling glitch? You did compile it
>yourself, correct? With sun java or GCJ?
1. "ant clean"
2. delete test folder contents as it depends on junit, regardless the
proclamation of default target being independent of them now it still is (here)
3. "ant"
4.
Doesn't happen here. Maybe an SVN/compiling glitch? You did compile it
yourself, correct? With sun java or GCJ?
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:30:32PM +0100, freenetwork at web.de wrote:
> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh*
> build 11507
>
>
> Initializing SSK
Bug still in build 11514 :(
>As far as I know this is fixed.
>On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:43:09AM +0100, freenetwork at web.de wrote:
>> >> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh*
>> >> build 11507
>> >>
>>=20
>> >You realize you are running "unstable(testing)" builds
As far as I know this is fixed.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 07:43:09AM +0100, freenetwork at web.de wrote:
> >> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh*
> >> build 11507
> >>
>
> >You realize you are running "unstable(testing)" builds of alpha
> >software, right? If you
>> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh*
>> build 11507
>>
>You realize you are running "unstable(testing)" builds of alpha
>software, right? If you aren't doing it to test the software, I
>suggest you stick to the "stable" releases. If you are reporting a
>bug,
...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh*
build 11507
Initializing SSK Datacache (15344 keys)
Opening database using .\ssk-xxx.cache
Opening block db index
Keys in store: db 4422 file 4422 / max 15344
Deleted 0 of 0 temporary files (0 non-temp files in temp directory) in
On 12/21/06, freenetwork at web.de wrote:
> ...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh*
> build 11507
>
You realize you are running "unstable(testing)" builds of alpha
software, right? If you aren't doing it to test the software, I
suggest you stick to the "stable"
...and once again one of the recent change broke my node... *sigh*
build 11507
You realize you are running unstable(testing) builds of alpha
software, right? If you aren't doing it to test the software, I
suggest you stick to the stable releases. If you are reporting a
bug, could you choose
