[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations

2004-07-15 Thread Garb
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:54:35 + (UTC) From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ...The government in New Zealand has decided

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations

2004-07-15 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 16/07/2004, at 7:52 AM, Garb wrote: Message: 3 Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:54:35 + (UTC) From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-14 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:00:16AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: fproxy will timeout and then I have to start again. And then it won't even grab the parts it previously downloaded successfully So over a period of weeks my perception is that I eventually move

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work at all on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression that you expect Freenet to require an academic university level of bandwidth

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-14 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work at all on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression that you expect Freenet to require an

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-14 Thread Toad
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:54:35PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As much as your bandwidth allows. On a capped 256/128 connection Freenet managed to use 1.5GB in a day. Now I have a 10GB cap, not good. Anyway, that's the sort of transfer you can expect -

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-14 Thread Phillip Hutchings
Different views on what's realistic? Will Freenet just be a US or bandwidth rich countries project? The government in New Zealand has decided that 256/256 is the highest broadband speed that our telecom monomoply needs to make available to competitors. :-( 128/128 is the fastest connection

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-13 Thread Nicholas Sturm
Toad wrote: Is it? Very few. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-12 Thread Wayne McDougall
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits connection (based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity). You would want to adjust:

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations

2004-07-12 Thread Toad
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:20:23PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I increased the storage to 1G, which

Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-12 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits, and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under control. It works very well for those of us with monthly bandwidth caps. It does?! I

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-12 Thread Wayne McDougall
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote: There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits, and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under control. It works very well for those of us with

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations

2004-07-11 Thread Wayne McDougall
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple days after that I increased the

[freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]

2004-07-11 Thread Stephen P. Schaefer
From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits connection (based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity). You would want to adjust: inputBandwidthLimit=1250 and outputBandwidthLimit=1250