[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-07 Thread Luke771
Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 05 June 2007 10:24, Luke771 wrote: >> As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding >> (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I >> can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 01:58, Ben Dougall wrote: > On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 01:15 am, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Looks like you have a very old JVM. What version is installed? What > > version of > > OS/X are you running? > > OS X 10.2.8, Java 1.4.1 > > I think I read somewhere that 1.4.1

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 10:24, Luke771 wrote: > As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding > (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I > can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded > ports, but that's not much of a

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-06 Thread Ben Dougall
On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:56 am, Juiceman wrote: > > Well, OS X 10.2.8 itself isn't the problem. I guess no one was aware > of the Java version limitation. > > I'm sorry to hear that. :( Not to worry, at least I know now. > If you feel adventurous maybe you can download 1.4.2 and

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-06 Thread Ben Dougall
On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:03 am, Juiceman wrote: > > I'm not sure about this, but from the log it appears to be a problem > with SHA-256. > > Looking at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/ It > seems that SHA-256 might not have been added until version 1.4.2 > > You may

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 10:24, Luke771 wrote: As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded ports, but that's not much of a

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-06 Thread Luke771
Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tuesday 05 June 2007 10:24, Luke771 wrote: As for the NAT thing, I'm behind a NAT where I can't do port forwarding (evil ISP) and my 0.7 node works perfectly... well, almost perfectly: I can't peer to nodes that are also behind a NAT and with no forwarded

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Juiceman
On 6/5/07, Ben Dougall wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:03 am, Juiceman wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure about this, but from the log it appears to be a problem > > with SHA-256. > > > > Looking at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/ It > > seems that SHA-256 might not

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Juiceman
On 6/5/07, Ben Dougall wrote: > > On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 03:51 pm, David Sowder wrote: > > > I suspect the current real problem is that the node is not starting. > > Check for a wrapper.log file in directory where Freenet was installed. > > That should be able to tell us what went wrong. >

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Ben Dougall
On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 03:51 pm, David Sowder wrote: > I suspect the current real problem is that the node is not starting. > Check for a wrapper.log file in directory where Freenet was installed. > That should be able to tell us what went wrong. > > You can verify that Freenet is not

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Ben Dougall
On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 10:24 am, Luke771 wrote: > In Firefox the proxy settings are under > Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Network/Settings <=that's on Linux, the > Windows version goes Tools/preferences, etc (never used FF on MacOS) Thanks for the info, but there's no proxies set in either of

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Luke771
In Firefox the proxy settings are under Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Network/Settings <=that's on Linux, the Windows version goes Tools/preferences, etc (never used FF on MacOS) There are several quick proxy switching extensions for FF, my favorite is "Switch Proxy Tool" (in button mode, not the

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Ben Dougall
On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 01:15 am, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Looks like you have a very old JVM. What version is installed? What > version of > OS/X are you running? OS X 10.2.8, Java 1.4.1 I think I read somewhere that 1.4.1 is OK

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 04 June 2007 22:28, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for 127.0.0.1. > > BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent you > from accessing your node's local interface. > > On Monday 04 June 2007 22:21, Ben

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Luke771
In Firefox the proxy settings are under Edit/Preferences/Advanced/Network/Settings =that's on Linux, the Windows version goes Tools/preferences, etc (never used FF on MacOS) There are several quick proxy switching extensions for FF, my favorite is Switch Proxy Tool (in button mode, not the

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Ben Dougall
On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:44 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent you from accessing your node's local interface. I think it does allow NAT but NAT is not turned

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread David Sowder
Ben Dougall wrote: On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:44 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent you from accessing your node's local interface. I think it does

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Ben Dougall
On Tuesday, June 5, 2007, at 03:51 pm, David Sowder wrote: I suspect the current real problem is that the node is not starting. Check for a wrapper.log file in directory where Freenet was installed. That should be able to tell us what went wrong. You can verify that Freenet is not running

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Ben Dougall
On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:03 am, Juiceman wrote: I'm not sure about this, but from the log it appears to be a problem with SHA-256. Looking at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/ It seems that SHA-256 might not have been added until version 1.4.2 You may just

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Juiceman
On 6/5/07, Ben Dougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:03 am, Juiceman wrote: I'm not sure about this, but from the log it appears to be a problem with SHA-256. Looking at http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/ It seems that SHA-256 might

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-05 Thread Ben Dougall
On Wednesday, June 6, 2007, at 12:56 am, Juiceman wrote: Well, OS X 10.2.8 itself isn't the problem. I guess no one was aware of the Java version limitation. I'm sorry to hear that. :( Not to worry, at least I know now. If you feel adventurous maybe you can download 1.4.2 and copy the

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
> I found a Proxy button in Safari's preferences, which when clicked > opens the above mentioned Proxy settings in the System Prefs (which > has nothing set), so having something set for 127.0.0.1 is definitely > not the problem. And I've just found the Firefox one: it's set to "Direct

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:44 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: > Thanks very much for the reply. > > On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for >> 127.0.0.1. > > I can't see any proxy setting in either Firefox

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Matthew Toseland
Under connection settings? On Monday 04 June 2007 22:44, Ben Dougall wrote: > Thanks very much for the reply. > > On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for > > 127.0.0.1. > > I can't see any proxy setting in

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
Thanks very much for the reply. On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 10:28 pm, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for > 127.0.0.1. I can't see any proxy setting in either Firefox nor Safari's preferences. I've certainly never turned any on before.

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Matthew Toseland
Check your browser proxy settings. You want to set no proxy for 127.0.0.1. BTW your airport is almost certainly a NAT, but that shouldn't prevent you from accessing your node's local interface. On Monday 04 June 2007 22:21, Ben Dougall wrote: > This is the contents of the "freenet-latest.log"

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
This is the contents of the "freenet-latest.log" file in the logs folder in the Freenet folder (I have no idea what's going on): Jun 04, 2007 20:16:41:525 (freenet.node.NodeStarter, WrapperListener_start_runner, NORMAL): freenet.jar built with freenet-ext.jar Build #13 r12938 Jun 04, 2007

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
> Should Freenet be started up before you > attempt going to http://127.0.0.1:/wizard/ ? In the Terminal (command line): 1/tmp>cd /Applications/Freenet 2/Applications/Freenet>./run.sh start Starting Freenet 0.7... 3/Applications/Freenet> Is that a successful Freenet startup? Is that the

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
How come the welcome.html file tells me to open http://127.0.0.1:/wizard/ when there is not a single file on my machine called wizard or that has the word wizard in it? Should there be? How come the welcome.html says: > Freenet 0.7 Installation Successful! > > Next, configure your node

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
Maybe it's a firewall/NAT issue? I actually have no idea if I'm behind a firewall/NAT or not I'm afraid. I'm connected to the net via a home broadband connection which goes into an ADSL ethernet modem, to an Airport (wireless) base station, to my laptop. Some people have told me "your base

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
On Monday, June 4, 2007, at 08:22 pm, Ben Dougall wrote: > At a couple of points it attempted to load the welcome.html file in a > browser (I think). I say "I think" there because it used something I haven't come across before: some Java browser thing, then in BBEdit (a text editor). It just

[freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
Hi, I am unable to get Freenet 0.7 going at all in Mac OS X 10.2.8, Java 1.4.1. I've tried a number of ways. The most recent way is the "Install Freenet 0.7 using JavaWebStart." option under Mac OSX on this page . It went through the installation

Re: [freenet-support] unable to get Freenet going on OS X 10.2.8

2007-06-04 Thread Ben Dougall
Maybe it's a firewall/NAT issue? I actually have no idea if I'm behind a firewall/NAT or not I'm afraid. I'm connected to the net via a home broadband connection which goes into an ADSL ethernet modem, to an Airport (wireless) base station, to my laptop. Some people have told me your base