Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of …'
On Saturday 12 Mar 2011 17:16:40 no-re...@uservoice.com wrote: Customer Feedback for Freenet Project Inc. freenet.uservoice.com [freenet.uservoice.com] New Bug Report rgste...@gmail.com sent a message from http://freenet.uservoice.com/forums/8861-general [http://freenet.uservoice.com/forums/8861-general] I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of sapce I can devote to freenet. Would be swell if I could devote 10TB rather than the max of 300GB You can. The first time wizard won't set it larger than 300GB, but you can change it later. Go to the Configuration menu, then Core settings. But be warned that it will use more memory if you have a larger datastore, approximately half a meg of RAM for each gigabyte of disk if I remember correctly. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of …'
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:16:40 -0600, no-re...@uservoice.com wrote: I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of sapce I can devote to freenet. Would be swell if I could devote 10TB rather than the max of 300GB I wonder if all of Freenet can fit in those 10TB :D. Or if the size of Freenet can be mathematically estimated from a few random node samples. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of …'
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:56:31 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:16:40 -0600, no-re...@uservoice.com wrote: I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of sapce I can devote to freenet. Would be swell if I could devote 10TB rather than the max of 300GB I wonder if all of Freenet can fit in those 10TB :D. Or if the size of Freenet can be mathematically estimated from a few random node samples. Handwaving, since nodes are supposed to specialize over a specific key range, and assuming keys are equally distributed across the entire key-space, perhaps your 3% datastore utilization is a result of a small freenet. Ie. a node can only store (specialized-key-range-percentage * sizeof-freenet) gigs of data. If that's the case, the only way to increase your datastore would be to broaden your key-storing-range, but I don't think that would help, since freenet routing currently requires key specialization. Further handwaving, I wonder if it would be such a bad idea to support supernodes, with broader key specializations. For example, would it be a bad thing for a node to store the entire freenet? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet.uservoice.com] New message: 'I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of …'
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Dennis Nezic denn...@dennisn.dyndns.org wrote: On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:56:31 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:16:40 -0600, no-re...@uservoice.com wrote: I have a fibre line as well as 10 TB of sapce I can devote to freenet. Would be swell if I could devote 10TB rather than the max of 300GB I wonder if all of Freenet can fit in those 10TB :D. Or if the size of Freenet can be mathematically estimated from a few random node samples. Handwaving, since nodes are supposed to specialize over a specific key range, and assuming keys are equally distributed across the entire key-space, perhaps your 3% datastore utilization is a result of a small freenet. Ie. a node can only store (specialized-key-range-percentage * sizeof-freenet) gigs of data. If that's the case, the only way to increase your datastore would be to broaden your key-storing-range, but I don't think that would help, since freenet routing currently requires key specialization. Further handwaving, I wonder if it would be such a bad idea to support supernodes, with broader key specializations. For example, would it be a bad thing for a node to store the entire freenet? I think he is saying his node won't create a datastore larger than 300GB... ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
