Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-26 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 21 January 2011 19:32:15 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving more packets than it's supposed to, why is it taking so long (many minutes -- I never actually waited

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:06:28 +0300, Volodya wrote: Please describe the formula through which to calculate the speed of the data that you need to send to your peer, which has 19 other peers (and you have no knowledge about the speed with which they are transmitting). Simple: for i

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-22 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:55:40 -0500, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:06:28 +0300, Volodya wrote: Please describe the formula through which to calculate the speed of the data that you need to send to your peer, which has 19 other peers (and you have no knowledge about the speed

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: On Thursday 20 January 2011 20:32:30 Dennis Nezic wrote: Fix! Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to do that. Please refrain from mis-interpreting my words. (There is such a thing as

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting Can someone explain why bandwidth limiting might not be such a simple thing? Volodya tried, with his massive-incoming-packet theory (40KiB :p), but that's not true -- freenet packets are about

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 22/01/2011, at 7:21 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting Can someone explain why bandwidth limiting might not be such a simple thing? Volodya tried, with his massive-incoming-packet theory (40KiB

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:56 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: On 22/01/2011, at 7:21 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting Can someone explain why bandwidth limiting might not be such a simple

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Phillip Hutchings
On 22/01/2011, at 7:34 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:26:56 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: On 22/01/2011, at 7:21 AM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 05:59:06 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: a “simple thing” like bandwidth limiting Can someone explain why

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Phillip Hutchings
So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving more packets than it's supposed to, why is it taking so long (many minutes -- I never actually waited to see if the flood, which consumed my entire connection's 80KiB/sec capacity, would eventually subside) for the rate to

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving more packets than it's supposed to, why is it taking so long (many minutes -- I never actually waited to see if the flood, which consumed my entire connection's

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Volodya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2011 10:32 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving more packets than it's supposed to, why is it taking so long (many minutes

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Ray Jones
So let me see if I understand. It's a breeze to get my firewall to accept incoming TCP packets from A or from B. But there are special routing permissions necessary to forward packets from A to B or from B to A, and it would be a nightmare to keep routing tables straight? Speaking of

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:18:33 +0300, Volodya wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2011 10:32 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: So, the question then becomes, when the node is clearly receiving more packets than

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Ray Jones
On 01/21/2011 02:34 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:18:33 +0300, Volodya wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2011 10:32 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:22:13 +1300, Phillip Hutchings wrote: So, the question then becomes, when the node

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-21 Thread Volodya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please describe the formula through which to calculate the speed of the data that you need to send to your peer, which has 19 other peers (and you have no knowledge about the speed with which they are transmitting). Simple: for i in

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-20 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:48:56 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334 is now available. It may fix some recent problems (particularly bwlimitDelayTime problems). Please upgrade! Same problem as I originally reported a while ago. Input bandwidth limit is trivially broken. So, like

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-20 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Thursday 20 January 2011 18:24:15 Dennis Nezic wrote: Fix! Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to do that. David signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-20 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:28:24 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: On Thursday 20 January 2011 18:24:15 Dennis Nezic wrote: Fix! Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to do that. Please refrain from mis-interpreting my words. (There is such a thing as

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0.7.5 build 1334

2011-01-20 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Thursday 20 January 2011 20:32:30 Dennis Nezic wrote: Fix! Please refrain from bossing us around. You are not in a position to do that. Please refrain from mis-interpreting my words. (There is such a thing as 'c-o-n-t-e-x-t', eh?) (Perhaps acquire a sense of humor while you're at