Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-15 Thread evolution
Quoting Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Okay, you'll never get acceptable performance. Tough. Yeah! Get a proper operating system use schedule. -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-13 Thread Toad
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:31:23PM -0500, David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 10:12:19PM -0500, David Masover wrote: | | Strange. It didn't produce actual error messages? Usually the node | responds in a reasonable

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-12 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Sunday 11 July 2004 10:58 pm, David Masover wrote: | not sure my archives even go back that far, but the basis for | choosing Java should be obvious; platform independence and a | rich API that comes standard with the language. As a purely academic argument, Parrot and .NET both do those

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-12 Thread Toad
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 03:11:46AM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote: On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly: Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all the crypto required for even simple connections. Which is why we need to use native BigInt and FEC

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-11 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jay Oliveri wrote: [...] | days. Did you leave it running while properly opening up the port it uses | for incoming connections in your firewall (if needed)? Yes. It's on the firewall machine, which really only does NAT anyway. | I have an 2.5G

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-11 Thread David Masover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | On stable? How many live connections? Do you get RNFs? DNFs? I think stable was actually better last I checked than unstable. Don't know RNF or DNF from Dionsaur. 5-10 connections, 2 or 3 loaded before the browser timed out (guess). |

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-11 Thread Tracy R Reed
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:40:33PM -0400, Paul spake thusly: Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all the crypto required for even simple connections. Which is why we need to use native BigInt and FEC encoders to get something approaching reasonable performance. Fast

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Paul
Not nessessarly. Freenet requires a lot of horsepower because of all the crypto required for even simple connections. a href=http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45250;Java vs C++/a Java vs C++ Shootout Revisited June 15, 2004 Summary I was sick of hearing people say Java was slow,

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Friday 09 July 2004 12:15 am, David Masover wrote: What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now? I'm getting lots of pages taking forever to load (or never loading), and I think it's still using 100% CPU on my 200 mhz router on 768k (up and down) DSL, even though the browser is on

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Nicholas Sturm
All this aside, when routing doesn't work in Freenet it can't be blamed on the language it was implemented in. Broken routing can easily be coded in C, Python, assembler or whatever language you desire. On the other hand being tied to a proprietary language like Java under Sun's control

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:15:50PM -0500, David Masover wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What's the health of Freenet as a whole right now? I'm not sure. It depends on various factors. For example, which branch you are running. I'm getting lots of pages taking

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet Project health

2004-07-10 Thread Christopher Brian Jack
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Nicholas Sturm wrote: helping matters much. It's hoped this will change when one of the Free Software implementations of Java (gcj, Kaffe) becomes more stable wrt Freenet. I lost the meaning in the last sentence. What was intended by wrt? with-respect-to