Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[xor]

On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 12:17:51 AM Trevor john wrote:
>  I don't seem to be able to access freenet on my I phone and so can't get
> into darknet. Help

I'm not sure what your question is.

Were you looking for a Freenet app for your phone? There currently is no 
official Freenet app, you need to install Freenet on a regular computer.

Or was your problem that you were trying to use your phone to access the web 
interface of a Freenet installation on a computer? In that case, you will need 
to allow the IP of the phone to access the web interface. 
Go to:
> Configuration / Web interface / Click "Switch to advanced mode" at bottom of 
page
Then configure "IP address to bind to" to the LAN IP of the computer to allow 
machines on the LAN to access Freenet (this can be dangerous if untrustworthy 
people are on your LAN!).
Then also configure "Hostnames or IP addresses that are allowed to connect to 
the web interface." and maybe even "Hosts having a full access to the Freenet 
web interface (read warning)" to include the IP of your phone.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Bert Massop]

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Scotty Green  wrote:
> Is freenetproject available on android platform

Freenet does not support the Android platform out of the box.
You may be able to get Freenet running on Android if you are willing
to compile it yourself [1], but I have not heard of anyone actually
doing so yet.

— Bert

[1] "Theoretically Freenet could run on a good android phone, although
it's a background app so maybe only on recent versions. The APIs we
use from the JDK are (mostly?) also present in Android. Compile it
yourself, see what happens." —
https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Installing/POSIX#Android
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Bert Massop]

On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:03 PM,   wrote:
>
>
> Sent from Windows Mail
> Help!  I bought a new Dell laptop, and after installing Freenet, I could
> not get it to connect to anything.  What have I done wrong?

After starting your node, it first needs to announce to the opennet
network (i.e. connect to seed nodes to obtain enough peer
connections). Under normal circumstances, it may take up to an hour to
do so. This assumes you have set your node's network security to LOW
or MEDIUM: on HIGH or MAXIMUM it will not announce to opennet, and you
should add darknet peers manually.

You can observe the current opennet connection status of your node at
[1] and your darknet connections at [2]. You can review your node's
security settings at [3].

— Bert


[1] http://127.0.0.1:/strangers/
[2] http://127.0.0.1:/friends/
[3] http://127.0.0.1:/seclevels/
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] No subject

[Matthew Toseland]

On Sunday 11 October 2009 09:31:49 Dsoslglece wrote:
> l...@hushmail.com a écrit :
> > The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked 
> > AND that it says,
> > “This is untraceable, safe….”   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
> > The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from 
> > Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT 
> > ANONYMOUS!
> The meaning is :
> 
>  “Fetch over Freenet, this is untraceable, safe….:
> 
> To download the plugin, you use freenet (of course this is safe).
> 
> “Fetch over the web from 
> Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE"
> 
> 
> To download the plugin, you go out of freenet and from the web, in the 
> big dark forest, using your browser and all nude, you go to freenet's 
> central servers.
> and this obviously is traceable and not safe, since you are not using 
> freenet anymore... (of course, doing this,  you still can use Tor, or 
> jap for some protection)

You could if we asked you about proxies...


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] No subject

[Dsoslglece]

Evan Daniel a écrit :

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM,   wrote:
  

Hello. I hope this is OK. It’s quite long.

I wonder if anyone can help with this/these question/s-comment/s in
the form of clarification. I hope it doesn’t seem too petty but I
wonder if others go through the same confusion as I.

On this page: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ one can go to: “Load
Official Plugin”
The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked
AND that it says,
“This is untraceable, safe….”   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from
Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT
ANONYMOUS!

(Freenet isn’t safe?)

On this page: FREEMAIL-SETUP
http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:u...@xog49gnltumtjjzj0fvzugdpo4hjusy2us
GQkjE7NY4,EtUH5b9gGpp8JiY-Bm-Y9kHX1q-yDjD-
9oRzXn21O9k,AQACAAE/freemail/4/setup/index.html

It clearly directs one method of using the same plugin page as my
beginning comment above (Load Official Plugin), with the “only”
comment for that choice being that it is NOT ANONYMOUS!

So, is one correct to assume that the first directive is false,
misleading and/or has been tampered with (edited) by someone with
bad intent? Or is it the second one?

One point I am trying to make here is that this can cause some
immediate doubt and confusion in someone new to Freenet. I am
concerned because the world needs Freenet and Tor more than they
might consciously know. I recently saw figures about the estimated
number of users for both, and the numbers were very small. They are
small enough that large arrays of computers, set around the world
and networked, are capable of watching ALL nodes and gathering the
data to be analyzed.

Look at Tor. On the Network Map (of the world), there are nodes
running in sequential order, and all these are located in the same
place – near the CIA in the US.
Some of these sequential orders are showing up in other locations
around the Tor network.

I have found Freenet to be so frustrating and confusing to set up
and use, that as I search the web for information that is clear and
helpful, I keep coming across more comments from Users who are
quitting the program. Now it does make sense to me, that with
anonymity programs, the more using them, the better and more safely
anonymous it is for all. But, it seems the numbers are dwindling. I
don’t know.

I have used Tor for about 4 years. I recently went to its Hidden
Wiki and about one half of all its services were gone! So, I
wonder, as do others, is Tor is dying out?

I really don’t want to see that for Tor or Freenet.

If one goes to: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ first, before
finding the .jar or .zip download page (supposedly both are
anonymous but of course, IT DOESN’T SAY, then they might make a
very bad choice solely from being confused by the directions.

So, while this might seem very petty and/or trivial to (I don’t
know-most who might read this), it is very important to write
directions for the reader, not the writer!

In Tor, the Hidden Services may be tampered with, changed,
purposely to be misleading and dangerous, by those who want to
destroy anonymity and our right to it. They use anonymity to try
and destroy anonymity, except for them, of course.

Is this also possible with the Freenet pages of “howto’s?” Can they
be edited so that one is not aware of what is true, accurate and
good for the User?

Anyway, I am once more trying to set up Freenet, Freemail and Frost
and am close to quitting. If I were more knowledgeable, I would
write “howto’s” but I am not. It seems all I am is frustrated.

One last thing, at Freemail-Setup, it tells me to download
Freemail. The next bit of ‘howto’ is setting it up for “command
line version setup”.

I’m not doing that.

I don’t know the pros and cons of command line Freemail. At the end
of that instruction it says, “Now you have Freemail proxy
running….”
I DO? How? I didn’t do that so what the fuck happened? Does the
download set it up or does it have to be set up after it’s
downloaded? The latter makes sense to me but, it is now telling me
I already have it running without doing anything. So, why the
instructions? I mean, C’mon! I have to go by what the writer
writes, right?

Since it tells me I have it up and running, where is it? I can’t
find it. These instructions are telling me to insert the long
Freemail address I was given.
I was given? When? Where? I haven’t done anything yet but the
directions jump from something I don’t want to do and didn’t do,
to, “I’m up and running!”

This is a joke right? It’s only for those who are IT smart, meaning
very few, and anonymity will be shot on site.

Just before it gets to THUNDERBIRD, it tells me, “Remember that the
Freemail.jar program needs to be running whilst you are reading and
sending emails. So, where is it? There is no window to put in
any information.

Perhaps if I could get some help, yeah, I might be able to help
others.

Sorry for the rant but writing it out here 

Re: [freenet-support] No subject

[Dsoslglece]

l...@hushmail.com a écrit :
The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked 
AND that it says,

“This is untraceable, safe….”   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from 
Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT 
ANONYMOUS!

The meaning is :

“Fetch over Freenet, this is untraceable, safe….:

To download the plugin, you use freenet (of course this is safe).

“Fetch over the web from 
Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE"



To download the plugin, you go out of freenet and from the web, in the 
big dark forest, using your browser and all nude, you go to freenet's 
central servers.
and this obviously is traceable and not safe, since you are not using 
freenet anymore... (of course, doing this,  you still can use Tor, or 
jap for some protection)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] No subject

[VolodyA! V Anarhist]

l...@hushmail.com пишет:
> Hello. I hope this is OK. It’s quite long.
> 
> I wonder if anyone can help with this/these question/s-comment/s in 
> the form of clarification. I hope it doesn’t seem too petty but I 
> wonder if others go through the same confusion as I.
> 
> On this page: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ one can go to: “Load 
> Official Plugin”
> The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked 
> AND that it says,
> “This is untraceable, safe….”   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
> The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from 
> Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT 
> ANONYMOUS!
> 
> (Freenet isn’t safe?)

This point has already been answered, but i feel that there is a point that can 
be made here by answering it again.

When you fetch something from the regular internet, the request is easily 
traceable back to you. The warning that you see tells you that for that reason. 
The question is how did you get Freenet to run? If you have downloaded the 
installer from the official freenet site, or even if you have just visited the 
site without the use of Tor, somebody can potentially see that. It's the same 
with plug-ins.

It would be interesting if Freenet could check the proxy setting of the system 
and use that when downloading plugins. Thus if you set up your entire system to 
use Tor (for example) then Freenet would see that and pass the request for the 
download through it. I do see a few problems with it right away... the biggest 
being (as Evan Daniel pointed out) the level of understanding, an average user 
does not understand the difference between installing a Tor-Button plugin for 
Firefox and setting up Tor as the proxy for all communication that comes out 
from the computer. Also Freenet would be dependent on the external thing for 
anonymity, which isn't great.

Anyhow, back to my original point. When you download plugin (or anything else 
Freenet-related) from the Web, you identify yourself as a user of Freenet. That 
(in and of itself) does not tell anybody exactly what you say on Freenet 
(although may identify how you say that... downloading Freemail says that you 
will be sending Freemail messages, downloading Frost says you will be a frost 
user, etc.)

> On this page: FREEMAIL-SETUP
> http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:u...@xog49gnltumtjjzj0fvzugdpo4hjusy2us
> GQkjE7NY4,EtUH5b9gGpp8JiY-Bm-Y9kHX1q-yDjD-
> 9oRzXn21O9k,AQACAAE/freemail/4/setup/index.html
> 
> It clearly directs one method of using the same plugin page as my 
> beginning comment above (Load Official Plugin), with the “only” 
> comment for that choice being that it is NOT ANONYMOUS!
> 
> So, is one correct to assume that the first directive is false, 
> misleading and/or has been tampered with (edited) by someone with 
> bad intent? Or is it the second one?
> 
> One point I am trying to make here is that this can cause some 
> immediate doubt and confusion in someone new to Freenet. I am 
> concerned because the world needs Freenet and Tor more than they 
> might consciously know. I recently saw figures about the estimated 
> number of users for both, and the numbers were very small. They are 
> small enough that large arrays of computers, set around the world 
> and networked, are capable of watching ALL nodes and gathering the 
> data to be analyzed.
> 
> Look at Tor. On the Network Map (of the world), there are nodes 
> running in sequential order, and all these are located in the same 
> place – near the CIA in the US.
> Some of these sequential orders are showing up in other locations 
> around the Tor network.
> 
> I have found Freenet to be so frustrating and confusing to set up 
> and use, that as I search the web for information that is clear and 
> helpful, I keep coming across more comments from Users who are 
> quitting the program. Now it does make sense to me, that with 
> anonymity programs, the more using them, the better and more safely 
> anonymous it is for all. But, it seems the numbers are dwindling. I 
> don’t know.
> 
> I have used Tor for about 4 years. I recently went to its Hidden 
> Wiki and about one half of all its services were gone! So, I 
> wonder, as do others, is Tor is dying out?
> 
> I really don’t want to see that for Tor or Freenet.
> 
> If one goes to: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ first, before 
> finding the .jar or .zip download page (supposedly both are 
> anonymous but of course, IT DOESN’T SAY, then they might make a 
> very bad choice solely from being confused by the directions.
> 
> So, while this might seem very petty and/or trivial to (I don’t 
> know-most who might read this), it is very important to write 
> directions for the reader, not the writer!
> 
> In Tor, the Hidden Services may be tampered with, changed, 
> purposely to be misleading and dangerous, by those who want to 
> destroy anonymity and our right to it. They use anonymity to try 
> and destroy anonymity, except for them, of course.
> 
> Is this al

Re: [freenet-support] No subject

[Evan Daniel]

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM,   wrote:
> Hello. I hope this is OK. It’s quite long.
>
> I wonder if anyone can help with this/these question/s-comment/s in
> the form of clarification. I hope it doesn’t seem too petty but I
> wonder if others go through the same confusion as I.
>
> On this page: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ one can go to: “Load
> Official Plugin”
> The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked
> AND that it says,
> “This is untraceable, safe….”   NOW, untraceable means anonymous.
> The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from
> Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT
> ANONYMOUS!
>
> (Freenet isn’t safe?)
>
> On this page: FREEMAIL-SETUP
> http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:u...@xog49gnltumtjjzj0fvzugdpo4hjusy2us
> GQkjE7NY4,EtUH5b9gGpp8JiY-Bm-Y9kHX1q-yDjD-
> 9oRzXn21O9k,AQACAAE/freemail/4/setup/index.html
>
> It clearly directs one method of using the same plugin page as my
> beginning comment above (Load Official Plugin), with the “only”
> comment for that choice being that it is NOT ANONYMOUS!
>
> So, is one correct to assume that the first directive is false,
> misleading and/or has been tampered with (edited) by someone with
> bad intent? Or is it the second one?
>
> One point I am trying to make here is that this can cause some
> immediate doubt and confusion in someone new to Freenet. I am
> concerned because the world needs Freenet and Tor more than they
> might consciously know. I recently saw figures about the estimated
> number of users for both, and the numbers were very small. They are
> small enough that large arrays of computers, set around the world
> and networked, are capable of watching ALL nodes and gathering the
> data to be analyzed.
>
> Look at Tor. On the Network Map (of the world), there are nodes
> running in sequential order, and all these are located in the same
> place – near the CIA in the US.
> Some of these sequential orders are showing up in other locations
> around the Tor network.
>
> I have found Freenet to be so frustrating and confusing to set up
> and use, that as I search the web for information that is clear and
> helpful, I keep coming across more comments from Users who are
> quitting the program. Now it does make sense to me, that with
> anonymity programs, the more using them, the better and more safely
> anonymous it is for all. But, it seems the numbers are dwindling. I
> don’t know.
>
> I have used Tor for about 4 years. I recently went to its Hidden
> Wiki and about one half of all its services were gone! So, I
> wonder, as do others, is Tor is dying out?
>
> I really don’t want to see that for Tor or Freenet.
>
> If one goes to: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ first, before
> finding the .jar or .zip download page (supposedly both are
> anonymous but of course, IT DOESN’T SAY, then they might make a
> very bad choice solely from being confused by the directions.
>
> So, while this might seem very petty and/or trivial to (I don’t
> know-most who might read this), it is very important to write
> directions for the reader, not the writer!
>
> In Tor, the Hidden Services may be tampered with, changed,
> purposely to be misleading and dangerous, by those who want to
> destroy anonymity and our right to it. They use anonymity to try
> and destroy anonymity, except for them, of course.
>
> Is this also possible with the Freenet pages of “howto’s?” Can they
> be edited so that one is not aware of what is true, accurate and
> good for the User?
>
> Anyway, I am once more trying to set up Freenet, Freemail and Frost
> and am close to quitting. If I were more knowledgeable, I would
> write “howto’s” but I am not. It seems all I am is frustrated.
>
> One last thing, at Freemail-Setup, it tells me to download
> Freemail. The next bit of ‘howto’ is setting it up for “command
> line version setup”.
>
> I’m not doing that.
>
> I don’t know the pros and cons of command line Freemail. At the end
> of that instruction it says, “Now you have Freemail proxy
> running….”
> I DO? How? I didn’t do that so what the fuck happened? Does the
> download set it up or does it have to be set up after it’s
> downloaded? The latter makes sense to me but, it is now telling me
> I already have it running without doing anything. So, why the
> instructions? I mean, C’mon! I have to go by what the writer
> writes, right?
>
> Since it tells me I have it up and running, where is it? I can’t
> find it. These instructions are telling me to insert the long
> Freemail address I was given.
> I was given? When? Where? I haven’t done anything yet but the
> directions jump from something I don’t want to do and didn’t do,
> to, “I’m up and running!”
>
> This is a joke right? It’s only for those who are IT smart, meaning
> very few, and anonymity will be shot on site.
>
> Just before it gets to THUNDERBIRD, it tells me, “Remember that the
> Freemail.jar program needs to be running whilst you are reading and
> sending emails. So, where 

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Jago Pearce]

\"So, you should simply be able to configure your browser to connect using
SOCKS4 or SOCKS5 via localhost:81 and then you can access fproxy as if
you were on the remote ssh server at http://localhost:\";

Brilliant thanks! It was working all along , I just never thought to
connect to localhost! haha!

I now have a server running reliably and remotely 24/7, and accessible
from anywhere - lovely :-)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Dennis Nezic]

On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:14:18 +, Jago Pearce wrote:
>  This is my setup:
> 
> 1) client computer with ssh forwarding on port 81 (ssh -D81) enabled

So this creates a SOCKS proxy on the remote ssh server you're
connecting to, accessable via port 81 on your local client computer.

> 
> conecting through
> 
> 2) A proxy at address Proxy:8080

I'm not sure what this is--I'm assuming it's another link in a proxy
chain, right after your semote ssh server?

> 
> 3) Connectng to my shell server runnig shh on port 443

This is yet another console-only way to access it--entirely unrelated
to either the -D 81 session you started above, or to the direct
non-SOCKS port forwarding I mentioned in the previous post.

> 
> If I login with ssh I can use lynx to browse freenet but that isn\'t
> very good.
> 
> How can I browse freenet remotely this way?

So, you should simply be able to configure your browser to connect using
SOCKS4 or SOCKS5 via localhost:81 and then you can access fproxy as if
you were on the remote ssh server at http://localhost:

Though, if all you want is access to fproxy (and not other websites),
you don't need to setup the SOCKS -D ssh tunnel.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Dennis Nezic]

On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:14:18 +, Jago Pearce wrote:
>  This is my setup:
> 
> 1) client computer with ssh forwarding on port 81 (ssh -D81) enabled
> 
> conecting through
> 
> 2) A proxy at address Proxy:8080
> 
> 3) Connectng to my shell server runnig shh on port 443
> 
> If I login with ssh I can use lynx to browse freenet but that isn\'t
> very good.
> 
> How can I browse freenet remotely this way?

I'm not sure how to work with the (SOCKS) proxy, but you can forward
the port directly like:

   ssh -L :localhost: freenetusern...@freenetbox

And then use any browser through http://localhost:
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Luke771]

On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:33:57 +0100
bqz69 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


> 
> (I am the author of www.minihowto.org, and I have tried to make documentation 
> along your "lines" - it's not very easy?)

LOL you may have recognized the nickname, and possibly the writing style: I am 
the author of FAFS (Freenet Applications FreeSite)
And yes it IS easy: always assume that the reader doesn't know what you're 
talking about, that English is not his native language, that his education is 
below average, and he's a retard. So you get relatively few 'could you explain 
a little better...' questions.

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[bqz69]

On Tuesday 18 November 2008 13.26.01 Luke771 wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:42:11 + (GMT)
> Markus Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
>
>
> Sorry if I explain things that you know already, but I don't know what your
> general competence level is, so I'll assume you know very little, just in
> case (and it may be useful for someone else, too)
>
> > I am able to reach and open some of the sites I want to, but frequently I
> > get the message that a site seems to be unreachable, sometimes concerning
> > a site that opens some minutes later.
>
> This is expected on a newly estabilshed node. The first thing to do to get
> a new node to work better is to set the max store size and max memory usage
> (both in your config page at http://localhost:/config).
>
> But first lets talk about uptime quickly: Freenet needs to sun as much as
++

I like your answer, that's the way a lot more stuff of the internet should be 
explained (better more than less details), in order for ordinary people to 
learn.
 
Thanks - *smile*

(I am the author of www.minihowto.org, and I have tried to make documentation 
along your "lines" - it's not very easy?)

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

Please, when replying to newbies, CC them, because they're often not 
subscribed to the list. I've bounced your message to the poster.

On Tuesday 18 November 2008 12:26, Luke771 wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:42:11 + (GMT)
> Markus Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry if I explain things that you know already, but I don't know what your 
general competence level is, so I'll assume you know very little, just in 
case (and it may be useful for someone else, too)
> 
> > I am able to reach and open some of the sites I want to, but frequently I 
get the message that a site seems to be unreachable, sometimes concerning a 
site that opens some minutes later.
> 
> This is expected on a newly estabilshed node. The first thing to do to get a 
new node to work better is to set the max store size and max memory usage 
(both in your config page at http://localhost:/config).
> 
> But first lets talk about uptime quickly: Freenet needs to sun as much as 
possible. The optimal would be to let it run 24/7, but morning to night every 
day is also fairly good. What you DON'T want to do is 'start freenet -  visit 
freesite - shut down freenet'. It won't work. Freesites will take ages to 
load (when they do) and you'll be damaging the netwrotk. Let freenet run as 
much as your computer runs, and if you don't have an always-up box, consider 
letting your computer run just for the sake of freenet. the more Freenet 
stays up, the better your node will work, and themore it will help the 
network.
> 
> 
> Back to configuration; as we said, you should set store size and max memory 
usage to higher values than the defaults.
> You may have done that when you went through the Freenet First.time Wizard, 
but if you kept the defaults your store size and memory usage are very low 
because the defaults must work for everyone including users running on a 
junkware boxes in countries where they don't consider 700MhZ and 256MB RAM a 
low-end machine.
> 
> The values are different according to your box and the usage you make of it, 
but the rule of is 'the more the better'. See how much HDD space you can 
dedicate to Freenet and set your store size to that; some have dedicated 
Freenet disks 500GB or 1TB in size, others have 250+ GB freenet stores, but 
50GB is already fairly good. Remember than the bigger the store the better 
your node will work, because more stuff will be cached (encrypted) locally 
and will be fetched way more quickly when request it.
> 
> As for max memory usage, you can set this even higher than can afford in 
theory, becuse freenet won't allocate all the memory you give to it. High max 
mem values are needed in my experience because mem usage will peak sometimes 
and if it tries to use more memory than it's allowed to use, the node may 
crash.
> Those who operate machnes with 3 or more GB of RAM are known to set max 
memory usage up to 2GB.
> My node runs on box that only has 1GB of RAM, Freenet is set to use max 
770MB of it, and the node works pretty well.
> 
> I used to run nodes on virtual machines with max memory usage set to 256MB 
and they worked pretty well as long as I didn't queue too many or too large 
files for download/upload; therefore, if you are limited by the physical 
memory installed on your box, (for instance you can't set max mem. usage to 
anything higher than 256 or even 128MB) you will have to run few 
downloads/uploads at a time (wait for them to complete, then add more). 
Remember it's not the number of files, it's the total size.
> 
> Bandwidth usage settings are kind of relative. If you have a good connection 
(10MB+ high upload BW) you can set your bandwidth usage as high as your total 
bandwidth and freenet will never use but a fraction of that, but if your 
connection is medium-low, you'll need to limit freenet BW usage. In my 
experience trying to help new users get started, I've seen that the 
difference between upload and download bandwidth may be a problem. ISP' 
tout "high speed connections" without ever mentioning anything about upload 
bandwidth.
> 
> As an example, a connection that the ISP refers to as '12Mbit/s' never does 
what the ISP says it should: first of all 12MB/s (1.5MB/s) is a nominal 
value, the actual bandwidth rarely exceeds 2/3 of the nominal value stated by 
ISP (more often half of it), and most importnat, the higghly publicized 
12Mbit/s is only the download bandwidth. They never say anything about upload 
speed. If you're lucky you have 2Mbit/s but ,more often 1Mbit/s fot 'high 
speed' connections and 512 or 256 Kbit/s for medium range connections.
> 
> So, the point is, find out what your -upload- stream in KB/s is (find out 
what your ISP say your upstream is, then divide by 8 to get bytes; ISP's 
always talk about bits). Decide how much bandwidth you can afford to give 
freenet in upload and set that value under max bandwidth usage in config 
page. As for download bandwidth you may want to keep the defult -1, meaning 
4x the upstream. 

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Luke771]

On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:42:11 + (GMT)
Markus Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Sorry if I explain things that you know already, but I don't know what your 
general competence level is, so I'll assume you know very little, just in case 
(and it may be useful for someone else, too)

> I am able to reach and open some of the sites I want to, but frequently I get 
> the message that a site seems to be unreachable, sometimes concerning a site 
> that opens some minutes later.

This is expected on a newly estabilshed node. The first thing to do to get a 
new node to work better is to set the max store size and max memory usage (both 
in your config page at http://localhost:/config).

But first lets talk about uptime quickly: Freenet needs to sun as much as 
possible. The optimal would be to let it run 24/7, but morning to night every 
day is also fairly good. What you DON'T want to do is 'start freenet -  visit 
freesite - shut down freenet'. It won't work. Freesites will take ages to load 
(when they do) and you'll be damaging the netwrotk. Let freenet run as much as 
your computer runs, and if you don't have an always-up box, consider letting 
your computer run just for the sake of freenet. the more Freenet stays up, the 
better your node will work, and themore it will help the network.


Back to configuration; as we said, you should set store size and max memory 
usage to higher values than the defaults.
You may have done that when you went through the Freenet First.time Wizard, but 
if you kept the defaults your store size and memory usage are very low because 
the defaults must work for everyone including users running on a junkware boxes 
in countries where they don't consider 700MhZ and 256MB RAM a low-end machine.

The values are different according to your box and the usage you make of it, 
but the rule of is 'the more the better'. See how much HDD space you can 
dedicate to Freenet and set your store size to that; some have dedicated 
Freenet disks 500GB or 1TB in size, others have 250+ GB freenet stores, but 
50GB is already fairly good. Remember than the bigger the store the better your 
node will work, because more stuff will be cached (encrypted) locally and will 
be fetched way more quickly when request it.

As for max memory usage, you can set this even higher than can afford in 
theory, becuse freenet won't allocate all the memory you give to it. High max 
mem values are needed in my experience because mem usage will peak sometimes 
and if it tries to use more memory than it's allowed to use, the node may crash.
Those who operate machnes with 3 or more GB of RAM are known to set max memory 
usage up to 2GB.
My node runs on box that only has 1GB of RAM, Freenet is set to use max 770MB 
of it, and the node works pretty well.

I used to run nodes on virtual machines with max memory usage set to 256MB and 
they worked pretty well as long as I didn't queue too many or too large files 
for download/upload; therefore, if you are limited by the physical memory 
installed on your box, (for instance you can't set max mem. usage to anything 
higher than 256 or even 128MB) you will have to run few downloads/uploads at a 
time (wait for them to complete, then add more). Remember it's not the number 
of files, it's the total size.

Bandwidth usage settings are kind of relative. If you have a good connection 
(10MB+ high upload BW) you can set your bandwidth usage as high as your total 
bandwidth and freenet will never use but a fraction of that, but if your 
connection is medium-low, you'll need to limit freenet BW usage. In my 
experience trying to help new users get started, I've seen that the difference 
between upload and download bandwidth may be a problem. ISP' tout "high speed 
connections" without ever mentioning anything about upload bandwidth.

As an example, a connection that the ISP refers to as '12Mbit/s' never does 
what the ISP says it should: first of all 12MB/s (1.5MB/s) is a nominal value, 
the actual bandwidth rarely exceeds 2/3 of the nominal value stated by ISP 
(more often half of it), and most importnat, the higghly publicized 12Mbit/s is 
only the download bandwidth. They never say anything about upload speed. If 
you're lucky you have 2Mbit/s but ,more often 1Mbit/s fot 'high speed' 
connections and 512 or 256 Kbit/s for medium range connections.

So, the point is, find out what your -upload- stream in KB/s is (find out what 
your ISP say your upstream is, then divide by 8 to get bytes; ISP's always talk 
about bits). Decide how much bandwidth you can afford to give freenet in upload 
and set that value under max bandwidth usage in config page. As for download 
bandwidth you may want to keep the defult -1, meaning 4x the upstream. If you 
are one of the few lucky that have high upload bandwidths (as high as 
download), you may want to set the same value for both upload and download.


> I am totally new in this subject and all my real-world-friends are no-techies 
> and no-ne

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> > you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> > that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> > told if it happens after Sunday.
>
> 
>
> Ok Matthew,
>
> Seems to be still there even with version 1179.
>
> 11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
> after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
> it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of
> the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include
> this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
> 70.72.215.120:40858
> 212.202.31.3:43592
> 217.196.213.98:24330
> 88.175.66.28:52590
> 87.179.226.176:50173
> 217.153.12.122:50554
> 212.75.37.89:53150
> 85.229.124.96:13598
> 96.250.239.134:64676
> 86.54.216.133:53061
> 79.202.89.5:39002
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Also, node uptime is 3 hours now.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided
> you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests
> that it won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be
> told if it happens after Sunday.
>



Ok Matthew, 

Seems to be still there even with version 1179.

11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even 
after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report 
it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of 
the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include 
this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
70.72.215.120:40858
212.202.31.3:43592
217.196.213.98:24330
88.175.66.28:52590
87.179.226.176:50173
217.153.12.122:50554
212.75.37.89:53150
85.229.124.96:13598
96.250.239.134:64676
86.54.216.133:53061
79.202.89.5:39002

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you 
restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it 
won't go away and is still present. :< In any case we need to be told if it 
happens after Sunday.

On Saturday 15 November 2008 08:54, Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote:
> > > 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
> > > even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. 
Please
> > > report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ 
or
> > > at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what
> > > version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not 
want
> > > to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
> > >
> > >
> > > My Node
> > >  * Freenet 0.7 Build #1178 r23592M
> > >  * Freenet-ext Build #24 r23199
> >
> > 
> >
> > Got the same message with the same build of freenet. But I've got 4 peers
> > reported to have severe problems.
> 
> 
> 
> Ok I didn't read the other new messages on the list before I read this one. 
So 
> it is to be expected that this message is gone after Sunday when the new 
> version of freenet is mandatory? 
> 
> 
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at 
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


pgpn7V3QtXSJl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote:
> > 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets
> > even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please
> > report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or
> > at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what
> > version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want
> > to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
> >
> >
> > My Node
> >  * Freenet 0.7 Build #1178 r23592M
> >  * Freenet-ext Build #24 r23199
>
> 
>
> Got the same message with the same build of freenet. But I've got 4 peers
> reported to have severe problems.



Ok I didn't read the other new messages on the list before I read this one. So 
it is to be expected that this message is gone after Sunday when the new 
version of freenet is mandatory? 


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Peter J.]

On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote:
> 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even
> after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report
> it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of
> the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include
> this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are:
>
>
> My Node
>  * Freenet 0.7 Build #1178 r23592M
>  * Freenet-ext Build #24 r23199
>


Got the same message with the same build of freenet. But I've got 4 peers 
reported to have severe problems.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

On Sunday 22 June 2008 03:56, Hierophant wrote:
> I've recently implemented a Freenet opennet node via XeroBank 2.0 
 and would appreciate comments, especially regarding 
performance and security.  XeroBank 2.0 is a commercial broadband descendant 
of Tor.  XeroBank is apparently incorporated in Panama.  Although XeroBank's 
website has short bios on its key staff, I have not found any information 
regarding its owners.
> 
> XeroBank access costs $35 per month for 75 Gb at ca. 1.5 Mb/sec download and 
ca. 0.5 Mb/sec upload.  Clients are assigned both access and deposit account 
numbers, and only deposit-account-to-access-account transactions are 
supposedly possible.  Also, payments to XeroBank are anonymized via Dalpay in 
Iceland, and so even deposit accounts are supposedly anonymous.  Multiple 
machines can access XeroBank simultaneously, and each machine (real and/or 
virtual) has a separate encrypted VPN channel to its network.  There are 
currently exit nodes in Canada and the Netherlands.  The IP of an exit node 
persists until the originating VPN channel terminates.
> 
> I've corresponded with Steve Topletz, one of XeroBank's technical 
consultants, and he's assured me that running a Freenet doesn't violate its 
terms of service unless doing so generates upstream complaints.  For those 
who don't know of Steve Topletz, he's a veteran of Cult of the Dead Cow and 
Hacktivismo, and was active in Tor development.  There are interviews with 
him on darkREADING , NowPublic 
 and the American Chronicle 
.
> 
> As I understand XeroBank, only entities capable of global correlation 
attacks can trace traffic between its entry and exit nodes.  Being a private 
network, XeroBank doesn't share Tor's key vulnerability to evil exit nodes.  
According to XeroBank's Privacy Policy 
, it does not log IPs or activity 
unless there is evidence of malicious activity which violates its terms of 
service and/or human rights, or unless it's been compelled by "court orders 
of all applicable jurisdictions for all specific servers" (which are in 
multiple countries).
> 
> Lack of IP anonymity is the key vulnerability of Freenet in insecure mode, 
and even for darknets if they're compromised.  By running this node via 
XeroBank, none of my opennet peers knows my true IP.  And given that each 
machine connects via a separate VPN and has a distinct exit IP, I can run a 
second node that connects only to my opennet node, and use only that node for 
accessing Freenet.  As I understand Freenet, the activities of that draknet 
node would not be visible to any of my opennet peers.
> 
> I'm currently running my main node using Freenet 0.7 Build #1152 r20268 in a 
virtual Win XP SP2 machine on a PGP-encrypted partition, using Java Version 
1.6.0_06 and JVM Version 10.0-b22.  There's now a XeroBank 2.0 version of xB 
Machine, and I'll switch to that shortly.  The Win XP machine has one CPU, 1 
Gb memory and a 30 Gb hard disk.  The node has one CPU, 512 Mb memory, a 20 
Gb datastore and bandwidth limits of 50 Kbps output and 100 Kbps input.  The 
node has been up for over two days, and has generally had ca. 5-10 peers.  
Output and input rates have generally been ca. 25-50 Kbps.
> 
> Freenet provides many other statistics, but I'm not going to dump them all 
here.  However, given that I do want help optimizing this node's performance, 
I'll be happy to provide whatever non-compromising information that's 
requested.
> 
> Hierophant
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cool. However I would point out that there is an entire industry dedicated to 
reversing money anonymisation schemes.


pgpBG4rHN5Ssy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

On Sunday 14 October 2007 18:22, Wendy Cooper wrote:
> 
> Please could you help me to uninstall freenet from my computer. the 
uninstaller is not working and I have followed the instructions by saving the 
code to Freenet's folder and run it but it hasn't worked.

Well what did it do if it didn't work?
>  
> Wendy


pgprPWf7GBfeh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

On Tuesday 09 October 2007 08:58, shady waseef wrote:
> please how can i uninstall the free net from my pc .. i try many time to 
remove it and it's not work .. please tell me what is the wrong exuctly 

Please tell me what you did and what happened. You have tried to follow the 
instructions on the uninstall page? Did the node get installed in the first 
place?

>   thanx for ur care 


pgpD6qc69uqvt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:56:41PM -0700, Isaac Karjala wrote:
> Does Freenet work with Dynamic IP's?

Yes, most people on Freenet have dynamic IPs. If you are behind a
router, you should consider forwarding the freenet UDP listen port
(FNP port number on /config/); this isn't strictly necessary but it will
help sometimes. Also some people use www.dyndns.com or similar services;
this again can help sometimes, but isn't really necessary, and
introduces a single point of attack (dyndns).
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Stefan Grönberg]

yes

Isaac Karjala wrote:

Does Freenet work with Dynamic IP's?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

LOL. Seriously, yes you can. Install freenet 0.7, get some references
from #freenet-refs , then start up fproxy on http://127.0.0.1:/ and
click on Darknet Index to see what's available through Freenet's
internal web, and open up Frost to chat and exchange even more files.

Note that we do not endorse piracy in any shape or form, or any other
illegal activity. If you ask about files which are obviously illegal
when asking for technical support, you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RECEIVE HELP
FROM PROJECT STAFF.

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:51:41AM -0400, Evan Daniel wrote:
> Yes.
> 
> On 7/8/06, jiao lei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Can I upload and download files from freenet?
> >
> >J
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Evan Daniel]

Yes.

On 7/8/06, jiao lei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Can I upload and download files from freenet?

J
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

Absolutely ANY service you use on the internet will at some point have
to see your IP address. This is how the internet works - in order for 2
peers to communicate they must know each other's IP addresses. Freenet
disguises a) the fact that you are using freenet, and b) what you are
doing on freenet (which files you are fetching or inserting).

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:45:11PM +0200, jing bling wrote:
> If I was to be identified, could my IP address with a service provider match 
> that with an IP address in .07?.
> 
> - Original Message 
> From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: support@freenetproject.org
> Sent: Friday, 7 July, 2006 10:05:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
> 
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> > I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be
> > tracked by their IP address or email address?
> 
> Freenet is indeed very secure.  The most any attacker or snoop can 
> determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less 
> likely than ever with 0.7
> 
> As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine 
> and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it 
> is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting.
> 
> Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting 
> on about pedophiles and child porn.  While CP posters are vile, they do 
> server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it.  
> 
> The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is 
> secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's 
> identity.
> 
> BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in 
> freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP.  If 
> you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or 
> sites.  The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll 
> drop out of freenet.
> 
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support@freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)

[jing bling]

If I was to be identified, could my IP address with a service provider match that with an IP address in .07?.
- Original Message From: Anonymous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: support@freenetproject.orgSent: Friday, 7 July, 2006 10:05:17 PMSubject: Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
You wrote:> I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be> tracked by their IP address or email address?Freenet is indeed very secure.  The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting.Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn.  While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it.  The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity.BTW-
 you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP.  If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites.  The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet.___Support mailing listSupport@freenetproject.orghttp://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.supportUnsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/supportOr mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)

[Anonymous]

You wrote:

> I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be
> tracked by their IP address or email address?

Freenet is indeed very secure.  The most any attacker or snoop can 
determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less 
likely than ever with 0.7

As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine 
and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it 
is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting.

Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting 
on about pedophiles and child porn.  While CP posters are vile, they do 
server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it.  

The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is 
secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's 
identity.

BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in 
freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP.  If 
you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or 
sites.  The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll 
drop out of freenet.

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

That depends on what you mean. The objective of freenet is that it be
very difficult for an attacker to determine who is posting, or reading,
a particular freesite or Frost post. Also freenet 0.7, if used properly,
makes it difficult for an attacker to discover that you are running a
freenet node. However you can only have this protection against
discovery, and protection from various attacks, if you use 0.7 as a
"darknet" i.e. you connect only to people you know/trust already. In any
case, you are more vulnerable to somebody whose node you are connected
to than to somebody you are not connected to.

Now, the present implementation does have weaknesses, as it is only an
alpha. However, that is our objective, and we have gone some way towards
it.

On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:25:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked 
> by their IP address or email address?
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[zhang jiouliang]

pl gave me a freenet.



From: "zhangjia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: support@freenetproject.org
To: 
Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:53:49 +0800





___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at 

http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Jerome Flesch]

> every time that i'm using the url irc.freenet it's asking me for a user
> name and password. how can i get / sign up for the username.
> thanks alot,
> Edo.
>  
I don't know where you try to connect, but Freenet irc channels are on 
irc.freenode.net (and not irc.freenet) and their names are #freenet and 
#freenet-refs.


-- 
Jerome Flesch.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[n/a n/a]

From: "boyonedar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: support@freenetproject.org
To: 
Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:06:56 -0500

I downloaded freenet. I went to main page and sometimes I can get into
links and other times it times out. When I can get into links and get
to files it rarely get through download without timing out. any help
here... Thanks
boy




___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at 
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/


___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

Details would be interesting. What is the average time a connection
lasts for? Are these connections from nodes which are in the routing
table? Normally we won't accept a new connection if many of our existing
connections are "new", and they remain that way for quite some time.

On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:20:51PM -0700, Vanessa wrote:
> I hope you will make the 0.7 version strong enough to not have a problem
> with massive number incoming connections. The i/o at muxing level (I
> have seen it, I will spare you my critique, it has given you enough
> trouble, I can see) in the current 5.something stable version is not
> able to stand against 60 incoming connection attempts per 90 seconds on
> average. I modded the node so that it is able to stand against it and
> get healthy connection lfe times. If you are interested in that mod you
> should let me know. Same goes for feeding FuqidOnSteroids the number of
> inbound and outbound connections (easy). ShitList is a bit harder and
> not complete yet and help would be appreciated.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Toad]

Hi. The usual checklist:
1. What exactly happens when you try to access the freesites (e.g.
Content of Evil) from http://127.0.0.1:/ ?
2. Are you behind any sort of firewall? If so, did you forward the
listen port?
3. How long has your node been up? It probably won't work well for the
first day or so.
4. http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
Show me the text at the top, from the line starting "Number of known 
routing nodes" down to and including the line starting "Backed off nodes".
5. http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/networking/ocm?setMode=Connection
Show me the stats at the top. Mine say:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)   27 (15/12/200)
Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving)   3 (1/2)
Data waiting to be transferred  None
Total amount of data transferred1,366 KiB
Show me what yours say.

By the way, please set a subject line in future, it makes it easier to
moderate incoming non-subscriber posts; spams often have no subject,
so not setting one makes my job as moderator take slightly longer.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 04:00:44PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> the freenet Deamon seems to work fine. but how can i get somethin to download??? I 
> am not working as a node with no goods from that network. there is even no 
> instruktion on your hompage how to install and so on. 
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[S]

On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
David Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[spam that doesn't even resolve]

> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 

There's a joke here somewhere...
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Toad]

Hmmm. Go to http://127.0.0.1:/ . What build number is it running? Go
to Advanced mode. Then try again, and show me exactly what it says on
the Route Not Found error page.

On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I keep on getting the error message: 
> 
> Couldn't Retrieve Key   
> 
> Couldn't connect to the network. Are you sure you have configured Freenet correctly? 
> Also make sure that you are connected to the internet.
> 
> Retrying...
> 
> And I cant figure out how to get it to work..I was behind a linksys router but I 
> unplugged that and hooked my computer up directly to the DSL modem and I closed 
> zonealarm. Can you help me out?
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT** Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Jay Oliveri]

On Friday 06 August 2004 10:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right
> to call witnesses, and the right to counsel. The fourth amendment is the
> protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
>
> And I've never suggested we ditch or add anything.  Laws preventing you
> from transmitting illegal material are already on the books and have been
> affirmed many times.
[snip]

OT.. keep it on chat.. this doesn't even belong in Tech.

-- 
Jay Oliveri
GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54
FCPTools Maintainer
www.sf.net/users/joliveri
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right to call 
witnesses, and the right to counsel.
The fourth amendment is the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

And I've never suggested we ditch or add anything.  Laws preventing you from 
transmitting illegal material are already on the books and have been affirmed many 
times.


PS: Bounced to chat as per toad's request

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 12:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Importance: Low


I'd think the sixth admendment (protection from unreasionable search
and seizure) helps people get away with crimes all the time. Should we
ditch that too?
~Paul

On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:55:58 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be.  If it was it would be almost 
> impossible to arrest anyone.  All you would need to do is have someone ask you to do 
> it beforehand.
> Someone asks you to hold their box of drugs.  Oh but you didn't know what was in the 
> box it must be a big mistake.
> Someone asks you to help him into his locked house.  Oh but you didn't know that it 
> wasn't his house.
> Someone asks you to hide him from the cops.  I guess it's alright because you didn't 
> know he committed a crime.
> If you allow people to hide behind the fact that they simply didn't know with 100% 
> certainty that what they were doing was a crime no one would ever be guilty.  It's 
> called personal responsibility, if your doing something it's up to you to ensure its 
> legal.
> 
> Someone that has drug deals happen in his yard does have a defense.  He didn't let 
> them.  If he had said 'Sure come on in and use my yard to deal drugs' (like when you 
> run a freenet node) then he would be guilty.
> Ignoring an obvious crime is not a crime, you can watch someone get shot and killed 
> if you wanted.  Ignoring your obvious crime however is quite punishable.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
> Importance: Low
> 
> On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ("Matthew Findley") writes
> 
> | Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work.
> | First I should probably clear this up.  I am not a lawyer.  I work at the
> |  U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is
> | legal advice, the postion of the DOJ, to be considered an offical
> | interpretation of the laws, ect
> 
> In other words, you were reprimanded at work for stirring up shit from an
> @usdoj.gov email address and now it's time to interject the disclaimers.
> If you weren't yet, you will be.  I've been in a similar position, though
> not quite exactly the same, I made the same mistake, using a uniform email
> address in a civilian conversation, and I've felt the heat for it.
> 
> On the one hand, I sympathize with you.  Why would Anonymous issue an
> apology?  Because even Anonymous can and perhaps will be identified via
> linguistic analysis, though I've done my best to pervert this message in
> such a manner that it cannot be connected with its author.  On the other
> hand, I must assert that whomever initiated or will initiate the stink, it
> didn't start or won't start with me.  Although, believe me, I have
> considered it since your first post to this list from an official address,
> and long before the current thread was borne.
> 
> You go on to state
> 
> | Let me put it this way. When you all fire up your nodes you know there
> | is a very strong likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting
> | illegal material, correct?
> 
> I would ask "Who is 'you all'?" and I would posit that the response is not
> 'correct.'  (I would also insert a 'you people' and 'H Perot' reference,
> but that would be controversial and too demonstrable of knowledge of U.S.
> politics, no?)
> 
> Freenet is comprised of a wide variety of users.  Many of those users whom
> have been and continue to remain early adopters of Freenet are those same
> people what were and continue to be early adopters of other emerging
> technologies.  They're in it for the tech, they're in it for the ideals,
> they're in it to support the ability of oppressed citizenries (I must
> wonder if that now applies to you in the States?) to have the continued
> fr

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Paul]

I'd think the sixth admendment (protection from unreasionable search
and seizure) helps people get away with crimes all the time. Should we
ditch that too?
~Paul

On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:55:58 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be.  If it was it would be almost 
> impossible to arrest anyone.  All you would need to do is have someone ask you to do 
> it beforehand.
> Someone asks you to hold their box of drugs.  Oh but you didn't know what was in the 
> box it must be a big mistake.
> Someone asks you to help him into his locked house.  Oh but you didn't know that it 
> wasn't his house.
> Someone asks you to hide him from the cops.  I guess it's alright because you didn't 
> know he committed a crime.
> If you allow people to hide behind the fact that they simply didn't know with 100% 
> certainty that what they were doing was a crime no one would ever be guilty.  It's 
> called personal responsibility, if your doing something it's up to you to ensure its 
> legal.
> 
> Someone that has drug deals happen in his yard does have a defense.  He didn't let 
> them.  If he had said 'Sure come on in and use my yard to deal drugs' (like when you 
> run a freenet node) then he would be guilty.
> Ignoring an obvious crime is not a crime, you can watch someone get shot and killed 
> if you wanted.  Ignoring your obvious crime however is quite punishable.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
> Importance: Low
> 
> On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ("Matthew Findley") writes
> 
> | Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work.
> | First I should probably clear this up.  I am not a lawyer.  I work at the
> |  U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is
> | legal advice, the postion of the DOJ, to be considered an offical
> | interpretation of the laws, ect
> 
> In other words, you were reprimanded at work for stirring up shit from an
> @usdoj.gov email address and now it's time to interject the disclaimers.
> If you weren't yet, you will be.  I've been in a similar position, though
> not quite exactly the same, I made the same mistake, using a uniform email
> address in a civilian conversation, and I've felt the heat for it.
> 
> On the one hand, I sympathize with you.  Why would Anonymous issue an
> apology?  Because even Anonymous can and perhaps will be identified via
> linguistic analysis, though I've done my best to pervert this message in
> such a manner that it cannot be connected with its author.  On the other
> hand, I must assert that whomever initiated or will initiate the stink, it
> didn't start or won't start with me.  Although, believe me, I have
> considered it since your first post to this list from an official address,
> and long before the current thread was borne.
> 
> You go on to state
> 
> | Let me put it this way. When you all fire up your nodes you know there
> | is a very strong likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting
> | illegal material, correct?
> 
> I would ask "Who is 'you all'?" and I would posit that the response is not
> 'correct.'  (I would also insert a 'you people' and 'H Perot' reference,
> but that would be controversial and too demonstrable of knowledge of U.S.
> politics, no?)
> 
> Freenet is comprised of a wide variety of users.  Many of those users whom
> have been and continue to remain early adopters of Freenet are those same
> people what were and continue to be early adopters of other emerging
> technologies.  They're in it for the tech, they're in it for the ideals,
> they're in it to support the ability of oppressed citizenries (I must
> wonder if that now applies to you in the States?) to have the continued
> freedom to express their ideas.  And for fuck's sakes, some of them are
> just in it for the challenge of programming something new in Java.
> 
> More to a point, there are Freenet node operators what have no idea that
> they may end up storing or transmitting illicit material.  There are
> Freenet node operators what have been convinced by acquaintances to try out
> a new software program, one which is at the bleeding edge of networking,
> one which hopes to offer anonymity to its users, and what have installed
> Freenet to this very end.  There are Freenet node operators what run a node
> but don't make any use of its existance.  There are Freenet node operators
> what run a node simply because they have a machine with a nice linkup and a
> friend what asked a favor of them.
> 
> You made a statement
> 
> | The fact is that everyone knows there lots of illegal stuff floating
> | around freenet, and one can simply not avoid responsibility for a
> | crime by deliberately ignoring what is obvious.
> 
> Although I'm not under your jurisdi

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be.  If it was it would be almost 
impossible to arrest anyone.  All you would need to do is have someone ask you to do 
it beforehand.
Someone asks you to hold their box of drugs.  Oh but you didn't know what was in the 
box it must be a big mistake.
Someone asks you to help him into his locked house.  Oh but you didn't know that it 
wasn't his house.
Someone asks you to hide him from the cops.  I guess it's alright because you didn't 
know he committed a crime.
If you allow people to hide behind the fact that they simply didn't know with 100% 
certainty that what they were doing was a crime no one would ever be guilty.  It's 
called personal responsibility, if your doing something it's up to you to ensure its 
legal.

Someone that has drug deals happen in his yard does have a defense.  He didn't let 
them.  If he had said 'Sure come on in and use my yard to deal drugs' (like when you 
run a freenet node) then he would be guilty.
Ignoring an obvious crime is not a crime, you can watch someone get shot and killed if 
you wanted.  Ignoring your obvious crime however is quite punishable.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Importance: Low


On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]| ("Matthew Findley") writes

| Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work.
| First I should probably clear this up.  I am not a lawyer.  I work at the
|  U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is 
| legal advice, the postion of the DOJ, to be considered an offical 
| interpretation of the laws, ect

In other words, you were reprimanded at work for stirring up shit from an
@usdoj.gov email address and now it's time to interject the disclaimers. 
If you weren't yet, you will be.  I've been in a similar position, though
not quite exactly the same, I made the same mistake, using a uniform email
address in a civilian conversation, and I've felt the heat for it.

On the one hand, I sympathize with you.  Why would Anonymous issue an
apology?  Because even Anonymous can and perhaps will be identified via
linguistic analysis, though I've done my best to pervert this message in
such a manner that it cannot be connected with its author.  On the other
hand, I must assert that whomever initiated or will initiate the stink, it
didn't start or won't start with me.  Although, believe me, I have
considered it since your first post to this list from an official address,
and long before the current thread was borne.

You go on to state

| Let me put it this way. When you all fire up your nodes you know there
| is a very strong likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting
| illegal material, correct?

I would ask "Who is 'you all'?" and I would posit that the response is not
'correct.'  (I would also insert a 'you people' and 'H Perot' reference,
but that would be controversial and too demonstrable of knowledge of U.S.
politics, no?) 

Freenet is comprised of a wide variety of users.  Many of those users whom
have been and continue to remain early adopters of Freenet are those same
people what were and continue to be early adopters of other emerging
technologies.  They're in it for the tech, they're in it for the ideals,
they're in it to support the ability of oppressed citizenries (I must
wonder if that now applies to you in the States?) to have the continued
freedom to express their ideas.  And for fuck's sakes, some of them are
just in it for the challenge of programming something new in Java.

More to a point, there are Freenet node operators what have no idea that
they may end up storing or transmitting illicit material.  There are
Freenet node operators what have been convinced by acquaintances to try out
a new software program, one which is at the bleeding edge of networking,
one which hopes to offer anonymity to its users, and what have installed
Freenet to this very end.  There are Freenet node operators what run a node
but don't make any use of its existance.  There are Freenet node operators
what run a node simply because they have a machine with a nice linkup and a
friend what asked a favor of them.

You made a statement

| The fact is that everyone knows there lots of illegal stuff floating
| around freenet, and one can simply not avoid responsibility for a
| crime by deliberately ignoring what is obvious.

Although I'm not under your jurisdiction, I live in a country what seems to
have a keen and cooperative eye on what the States consider to be the
latest incarnation of Truth and Justice.  As such this statement makes my
skin crawl on its end.  Even more so that it was made from an official of
the Department of U.S. Justice. 

You are saying that a resident of a disadvantaged community has no defense
that a drugs deal was committed in his yard, because he

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Toad]

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:52:26PM -0400, samurai wrote:
>  the downloading speed is extremely slow!..help me please.

Sure. What did you try, and what happened?
Please show me the top 10 lines of
http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html
Are you behind a router, NAT or firewall?
Also how long has the node been up? Freenet will take a while to get
completely plugged into the network sometimes - it has to learn where
stuff is and which nodes are best for which keys. After 48 hours it
should be reasonable, in theory.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Toad]

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:57:25PM -0400, Peter E. Urban Jr. wrote:
> Clear Dayjust found your software, but can not do anythingi.e. couldn't retrieve 
> key   any of them did not work
> help
> thanks
> Pete

Firstly, please don't use HTML mail, if you can avoid it, when talking
to us.
Secondly, what exactly happened?
Thirdly, you can help us a lot by:
Load http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html in your
web browser.
Copy the top of the table at the top into an email and send it to us.
Example: mine is:

Number of known routing nodes   390
Number of node references   384
Number of newbie nodes  31
Number of uncontactable nodes   26
Contacted and attempted to contact node references  283
Contacted node references   134
Contacted newbie node references31
Connections with Successful Transfers   96
Backed off nodes63
Connection Attempts 178
Successful Connections  22

(the stuff below this point is less important).
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Matthew Toseland]

On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:43:44PM +0100, Denis Mazin wrote:
> Please, leave me off your mailing list.
> Think's
Whose mailing list? [EMAIL PROTECTED]? It's really not that
hard to unsubcribe you know. Here are the headers from your email (this
is a common way to show unsubscription etc information in mailing
lists... your mail client should be able to show you this by checking
Show All Headers or some similar menu option).

From: "Denis Mazin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: 
List-Post: 
List-Subscribe:
 ,
 
List-Id: 
List-Unsubscribe:
 ,
  ^^^
  Gee, I wonder what this URL does!
  
 
  ^
  This is fairly straightforward too - send an email to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject "unsubscribe".

List-Archive:
 

The easiest way for me to unsubscribe you from the list would be to
spoof your email address and send in the unsubscribe myself; I don't do
this because it would be against my ISP's terms of service :). The
second easiest involves getting perms to admin the list, which I don't
care about at the moment. Do it yourself.
-- 
Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker.
Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03
http://freenetproject.org/



msg02430/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[nicolas fischer]

> please i need help closing this program could you guide me thru this  thank
>you
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

what the fuck!
(sorry)

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Dave Hooper]

>  please i need help closing this program could you guide me thru this
> thank
> you

Simple.  In the top-right corner of Incredimail, click the X button. 
Alternatively go to Add/Remove Programs and uninstall "Incredimail".

d

___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[the bishop]

On Saturday 05 October 2002 15:05, you wrote:
> J'ai installé freenet. qd je sélectionne Open Gateway, une page ie s'ouvre
> www.127.0.0.1: avec impossible de trouver la page. Comment ça marche
> votre truc ?

(je ne parle français)

ouvre:

http://127.0.0.1:/

ou:

http://localhost:/

avec votre browser.


mfg The Bishop

___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[David T-G]

may --

...and then may said...
% 
% i have a free webpage through my isp but they say i need to buy microsoft front page 
or a nother front page i dont want to pay for my free web page were can i go i would 
be grateful for your help

1) This isn't that kind of freenet; sorry.

2) Can't you just use ftp to publish your web pages?  Whip out a copy of
mozilla, write your page in its composer, and hit publish and follow the
prompts.

3) You should probably find another ISP; after all, *you* are the
customer and *they* work for you!


HTH & HAND

:-D
-- 
David T-G  * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie
(work) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!




msg00930/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[u Uler]

Ana,

Before you install Freenet, you do need the Java runtime environment. There
are several options, but the package that I recommend you download is the
Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SE). Like Chris said, you can download
that from http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/download.html. What you'll want is
the J2SE v 1.4.0_01. Note that it is the STANDARD EDITION.

On the page it gives you several options. Basically, you can choose which
platform you want and the version of the product you want. You'll want the
Windows version, and you can choose between U.S. English only or all
languages. You can also choose between the JRE (Java Runtime Environment) or
SDK (Software Development Kit). The only thing you need to run Freenet is
the JRE. It is a smaller download than the SDK, but the SDK gives you some
extra functionality, like the Java compiler, which allows you to compile
your own source code. It doesn't matter which one you download.

After you've installed the JRE or SDK, you can then download the Automatic
Windows Installer from
http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/Download. You should not
receive an error when you try to download this. Try it again. If you still
can't get it to work, I can email you a copy of the file, but you should be
able to download it straight from the site.

The recent updates are "snapshot" updates geared towards improving the
performance of Freenet. In particular, the file that gets updated with every
new "build" is freenet.jar. The Automatic Windows Installer will
automatically download the latest "snapshot" of freenet.jar during the
installation process. Please note that you need to be connected to the
internet while you install Freenet. Also, after installation, you can update
your "snapshot" of Freenet without reinstalling the whole program. This will
allow you to retain all your settings files.

In answer to your question, you do need to install Sun's JRE or SDK before
installing Freenet, despite the recent updates.


Good luck with installing Freenet and your upgrade to Windows XP Pro!

Wesley.

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 01 July, 2002 01:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
>
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> My aim is to download the Freenet software.
>
> My computer details :
>
> Desk top -
> Intel Pentium 111 733
>  SDRAM 128 MB PC-150
>  Windows 98 SE
> - - planning to upgrade to XP pro in next 24hrs
>
> I have 3 basic questions.
> 1
> - -acessed the Sun.com site to download Sun's 1.4 JVM
>
> It's not particularly staight forward
> JVM appears to be a CVM or vis versa!
>
> The download that seems to be the closest to what you recommend is
>
> Java[tm] 2 Platform, Micro Edition
> Connected Device Configuration/Foundation Profile Version 1.0.1 Linux/x86
>
> This is for Linux?
> or
> Product Description Platform(s) Delivery Format
> Java HotSpot™ Virtual Machine 2.0 Solaris/SPARC™
> Solaris/Intel
> Linux
> Windows/NT Electronic Download Begin Download
> Java HotSpot™ Virtual Machine 1.0.1 Solaris/SPARC
> Solaris/Intel
> Windows/NT
> If I do a site search for Sun's 1.4 JVM ... the page is not
> available comes up.
>
> I have to confess I'm CONFUSED!
>
> 2
>
> Meanwhile back on your site page-
> http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/Download
>
> under Downloads and - Windows
>
> and where it says  to download the automatic installer and run it
> if I click this on, I get a page that says " You are not
> authorized to view this page"
>
> 3
> Aparently freenet has been updated as of 28th June. Does it still
> require us to download The Sun Java software?
>
> I would appreciate some assistance to help sort this out.
> Thank you,
>  Ana
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: Hush 2.1
> Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com
>
> wl8EARECAB8FAj0f9QsYHGF1dG8yMDc0NDRAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEFwf+75HF6Lm
> 5ZQAoJVkokcFDxIQu/U9nMg7JXDu/jzPAKCyAlk9lYyVfivP6ETXvuQqxpk/OA==
> =gTB4
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>
> Communicate in total privacy.
> Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
>
> Looking for a good deal on a domain name?
http://www.hush.com/partners/offers.cgi?id=domainpeople


___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support



___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Christopher William Turner]

I have detailed instructions on how to download Suns JVM here:-
http://club.cycom.co.uk/detailedInstallationInstructions.html

You can stop following the instruction after the JVM step unless you
would also like to
try Java Web Start and my software!


-- 
Christopher William Turner, http://www.cycom.co.uk/ Java development
since 1996
http://club.cycom.co.uk/tms.htm Terminology Management software
http://club.cycom.co.uk/wt.htm  Wind Turbine blade design software

___
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support

RE: [freenet-support] No Subject

[tech]

You may already have a proxy on port 8081.
Do this change on you brouser:
(IE example) Tools->Internet Optionts->Connections
->Check Bypass proxy for local addresses.

> 
> when I try to access freenet nothing happens.When I try to enter the URL 
> given I seem to need a password. hat I'm I doing wrong? 
> 
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
> 

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Mr . Bad]

> "MH" == Mike Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

MH> find something that works then advertise stupid!!!  

Hey, Mike. Sorry things didn't work out so great for you. What
happened? Did you have a particular problem, or was it generally just
a total mess?

What operating system are you using, by the way?

~Mr. Bad

--
~~
 Mr. Bad - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.shithousecrazy.com/
  * s t a y * * r e a l * * b a d *
~~

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Dave Hooper]

Yes.
Don't forget to download and install the Java Runtimes.
That's what it asked you to do.  Freenet is written in Java, and needs Java
Runtimes installed before it will work.  Therefore, to make it work, do as
it suggested.

I assume you are running on Windows.  So try this link for starters:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/download-windows.html

Dave

- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:32 AM
Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)


The download will not work. The computer says I have to locate Java
Runtimes.
I tried to update like it says and it still will not work.


___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Dave Hooper]

Can a speaker of the dutch language please translate?

- Original Message -
From: Sjaak Rijkse
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 6:59 PM
Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)


Dit is rotzooi,ik wil het downloaden en dan moet ik niet 25 x op een knopej
moeten drukken, maar 1 x


___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Dave Hooper]

Try re-downloading it and reinstalling it.  This is a very surprising error
indeed, since freenet.exe is the main executable file so I can't understand
why it can't find it.
One possibility is that you have installed freenet.exe onto a network-mapped
drive and that the shortcut in your StartUp folder is trying to access this
drive before the mapping has completed.
Another alternative is that you have installed freenet.exe using a login
which has access to a certain folder but then you are trying to run it as a
user who DOESN'T have access to this folder.

You don't say what operating system you are using.  Or what version of
freenet you are trying.
In fact you don't say much at all so this reply is total conjecture.

What path did you try installing freenet into?  e.g. C:\Program
Files\Freenet

Dave

> - Original Message -
> From: muhammad
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 11:48 AM
> Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject)
>
>
> when i am installing freenet an error comes up freenet.exe not found what
> should i do
>


___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[tech]

(1) 
Java cannot installed in a path with spaces.
(2) If 
the above is not the problem, try to turn off Zone Alarm 
temporaraly.
 
 

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of 
  GerrySent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:07 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [freenet-support] (no 
  subject)
  please see attached 
form

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Yuan P Li]

> After all, I'm interested to know what type of 
> websites get blocked by the communist party?

freenet.sourceforge.net, freenetproject.org, freenet-china.org
Voice of America (www.voa.gov), BBC (www.bbc.com), 
Radio Free Asia (www.rfa.org), Washington Post, 
New York Times, CNN, LA Times, etc
Falun Gong (falundafa.org, faluninfo.net, minghui.org )
And many many other news, political, human rights,
or religious websites.

China has completely blocked all newsgroups!!!

At one time, Caltech hosted a small website for "Falun Gong
Club in Cultech" on the same server that offers student
services. The Chinese communists block the entire caltech
webserver. So applicants in China were not able to 
complete the application until the matter was settled through
high deplomatic channels. And of course, the Club website
was moved out of the Cultech server.

How?

They have a national firewall that filters email and http 
packets. If they discover certain key words (like freenet) used
they will examine where they are from, and automatically
block the source, and in many cases, persecute the requester.
In many Internet bars, they have software to discover that
if you trying to visit any banned website (even through
proxy), and set off a sound alarm. The software is
generally called Internet-110, where 110 is the phone number
for police there. The son of the Chinese President directly
oversees the Internet-110 project.

There are also a lot of government supported professional
hackers to hack the above sites. So I knew sooner or later
freenetproject.org will be hacked. 

See articles (from search of "great firewall of China")
China: The Great Firewall 
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,16545,00.html
http://www.slashdot.org/yro/00/03/11/1223240.shtml
The Great Firewall of China (many different versions)
http://polywog.navpoint.com/sociology/devnat/firewall_of_china/
http://www.e-businessworld.com/english/crd_internet_85253.html

It is a hell there. And we need your help!

Sincerely,
Yuan


___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Marco A. Calamari]

At 09.47 31/05/01 +0200, you wrote:
>hmm, the way I understand your question is, that you want to access 
>websites which are blocked by the proxy you're using.
>Freenet doesn't provide access to websites, unless a website is 
>inserted(copied) in freenet you can't get it via freenet.
>Besides, it might be difficult to get a freenet node running, since you 
>seem to be behind a proxy/firewall.
>
>If you want access to freenet I'm shure someone(me too) could open fproxy 
>for you, just ask. This would give you a chance to mess with freenet.

A public Freenet gateway is

http://freenet.firenze.linux.it:8081/

HTH.   Marco




/"\
\ /ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
  X   AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \

* Mac (Marco A. Calamari) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.marcoc.it  *
* PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698   *
* DSS/DH:  8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B *
* PGP keys: request keyserver http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371   *


___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Stephan Balmer]

hmm, the way I understand your question is, that you want to access websites which are 
blocked by the proxy you're using. 
Freenet doesn't provide access to websites, unless a website is inserted(copied) in 
freenet you can't get it via freenet.
Besides, it might be difficult to get a freenet node running, since you seem to be 
behind a proxy/firewall.

If you want access to freenet I'm shure someone(me too) could open fproxy for you, 
just ask. This would give you a chance to mess with freenet.
BTW: anyone knows of public fproxy's? This would make sense for people that can't run 
their own node.

I think you're looking for tools like
HTTPTunnel: "httptunnel creates a bidirectional virtual data connection tunnelled in 
HTTP
requests. The HTTP requests can be sent via an HTTP proxy if so desired." 
www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html
Multiproxy: "Unique personal proxy server, helps protect your privacy on Internet and 
can speed up your downloads..." www.multiproxy.org/downloads.htm 

After all, I'm interested to know what type of websites get blocked by the communist 
party?

hope this helps you,
Stephan

On Thu, 31 May 2001 02:03:27 right ma wrote:
> Would you tell me how to use your freenet to open the sites wich locked my 
> the communist party?
> 
> thanks
> 
> _
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> 
> 
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
> 
> 



___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[James Rogers]

>is this project for free?
 
yes.
 
>can I download it ? how to do ?
 
yes, go here:
http://www.freenetproject.org/index.php?page=stable
 
 
>Is there possibility to download music through you?
 
probably.  it's not nearly as easy to use as Napster, though.

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Don Marti]

begin xjh quotation of Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:06:36AM +0800:

> How can I config the port number in freenet!

Edit freenetrc and change the listenPort line.  Example:

listenPort=31337

-- 
Don Marti  "I've never sent or received a GIF in my life." 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-- Bruce Schneier, Secrets and Lies, p. 246.
http://zgp.org/~dmarti/(Free the Web: http://burnallgifs.org/)

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[David Levy]

hi
your firewall may stop connections on freenet ports 
..;;;
 
have a look at recent discussions of Mika Hirvonen 
on the mailing list 
 
do u have any access to this firewall 
?actually, i put a Node on my Firewall and i connected my personal 
computer's Node to this one .;;
and it works good
 
good luck
 
David
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sylvain BORELLE 
  To: David Levy 
  Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:41 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (no 
  subject)
  
  I've tried those 2 adresses, but none of them is 
  working.
  I forgot in the previous mail to mention that I'm 
  behind a firewall. is this a problem?    
   
  ===Sylvain BORELLE[EMAIL PROTECTED]===
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
David Levy 
To: Sylvain BORELLE ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:38 
PM
    Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (no 
subject)

hi
first of all you should try to connect http://localhost:8081 or http://127.0.0.1:8081/ better than just http://localhost
 
tell us
 
 
David

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sylvain BORELLE 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:18 
  PM
  Subject: [freenet-support] (no 
  subject)
  
  Hi
  I've installed Freenet, but it doesn't work 
  at all.
  I've downloaded and tested the last version 
  (release 0.3.8.1), and I tried it under windows 98SE. My computer is a PC 
  with an intel celeron 433, 128Mo.
  When launching the software, an internet 
  explorer page opens and try to connect to http://localhost:/ , which can't be found. 
  Nothing happens then.
  I'm stuck here. Could you help me please to 
  find out from the the problem is coming? Thanx
  ===Sylvain 
  BORELLE[EMAIL PROTECTED]===

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[David Levy]

hi
first of all you should try to connect http://localhost:8081 or http://127.0.0.1:8081/ better than just http://localhost
 
tell us
 
 
David

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Sylvain BORELLE 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:18 
  PM
  Subject: [freenet-support] (no 
  subject)
  
  Hi
  I've installed Freenet, but it doesn't work at 
  all.
  I've downloaded and tested the last version 
  (release 0.3.8.1), and I tried it under windows 98SE. My computer is a PC with 
  an intel celeron 433, 128Mo.
  When launching the software, an internet explorer 
  page opens and try to connect to http://localhost:/ , which can't be found. 
  Nothing happens then.
  I'm stuck here. Could you help me please to find 
  out from the the problem is coming? Thanx
  ===Sylvain 
  BORELLE[EMAIL PROTECTED]===

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[David Levy]

Salut Yann
 
tu utilises la version Linux ou Windows 
?
 
je dois pouvoir t'aider pour la version windows 
deja  :
 
1/ as tu bien installé au préalable une JDK 
nécessaire pour faire lancer des programmes java?
je te conseille la dernière version de Sun : jdk1.3 
disponible sur javasoft.com ou autre part ;...;
 
2/ si tu l'as bien installé, il faut que fserve 
soit situé dans le meme repertoire que l'archive java freenet.jar
et si tu es sous windows lancer freenet.exe devrait 
suffire a activer le noeud ...
 
dis moi ou tu en es
 
bonne soirée
 
David

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Yann 
  HASCOET 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 7:15 
  PM
  Subject: [freenet-support] (no 
  subject)
  
  This is release 
  0.3.8.1:
  Thanks to help me using freenet
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://perso.wanadoo.fr/yann-hascoet/
   
   

Fwd: Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Ian Clarke]

- Forwarded message from Nadia Madany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

From: "Nadia Madany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

Dear Ian,
Thanks for your speedy reply. I installed the program on my hard disk and 
started it by clicking on the freenet.exe file, and then the system tray 
icon was displayed, now when I right-click that icon it gives three 
commands: open gateway, stop freenet, and configure. When I try to open a a 
gateway, the browser gives me a dead link with "The page can not be 
displayed" error. What should I do?
Thanks,
Nadia


>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Clarke)
>To: Nadia Madany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
>Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:41:21 -0700
>
>If you can be more specific about where you are having problems we will
>be glad to help.
>
>Ian.
>
>On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 10:29:39PM +, Nadia Madany wrote:
> > Kindly requesting support in configuring and using freenet.
> > Thanks.
> > Nadia Madany
> >
> > 
>_
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at 
>http://www.hotmail.com.
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Support mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
><< attach3 >>

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


- End forwarded message -

 PGP signature

Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)

[Ian Clarke]

If you can be more specific about where you are having problems we will
be glad to help.

Ian.

On Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 10:29:39PM +, Nadia Madany wrote:
> Kindly requesting support in configuring and using freenet.
> Thanks.
> Nadia Madany
> 
> _
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> 
> 
> ___
> Support mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support

 PGP signature