Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 12:17:51 AM Trevor john wrote: I don't seem to be able to access freenet on my I phone and so can't get into darknet. Help I'm not sure what your question is. Were you looking for a Freenet app for your phone? There currently is no official Freenet app, you need to install Freenet on a regular computer. Or was your problem that you were trying to use your phone to access the web interface of a Freenet installation on a computer? In that case, you will need to allow the IP of the phone to access the web interface. Go to: Configuration / Web interface / Click Switch to advanced mode at bottom of page Then configure IP address to bind to to the LAN IP of the computer to allow machines on the LAN to access Freenet (this can be dangerous if untrustworthy people are on your LAN!). Then also configure Hostnames or IP addresses that are allowed to connect to the web interface. and maybe even Hosts having a full access to the Freenet web interface (read warning) to include the IP of your phone. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Scotty Green scottygree...@gmail.com wrote: Is freenetproject available on android platform Freenet does not support the Android platform out of the box. You may be able to get Freenet running on Android if you are willing to compile it yourself [1], but I have not heard of anyone actually doing so yet. — Bert [1] Theoretically Freenet could run on a good android phone, although it's a background app so maybe only on recent versions. The APIs we use from the JDK are (mostly?) also present in Android. Compile it yourself, see what happens. — https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Installing/POSIX#Android ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:03 PM, dean.hawk...@rocketmail.com wrote: Sent from Windows Mail Help! I bought a new Dell laptop, and after installing Freenet, I could not get it to connect to anything. What have I done wrong? After starting your node, it first needs to announce to the opennet network (i.e. connect to seed nodes to obtain enough peer connections). Under normal circumstances, it may take up to an hour to do so. This assumes you have set your node's network security to LOW or MEDIUM: on HIGH or MAXIMUM it will not announce to opennet, and you should add darknet peers manually. You can observe the current opennet connection status of your node at [1] and your darknet connections at [2]. You can review your node's security settings at [3]. — Bert [1] http://127.0.0.1:/strangers/ [2] http://127.0.0.1:/friends/ [3] http://127.0.0.1:/seclevels/ ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] No subject
On Sunday 11 October 2009 09:31:49 Dsoslglece wrote: l...@hushmail.com a écrit : The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked AND that it says, “This is untraceable, safe….” NOW, untraceable means anonymous. The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT ANONYMOUS! The meaning is : “Fetch over Freenet, this is untraceable, safe….: To download the plugin, you use freenet (of course this is safe). “Fetch over the web from Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE To download the plugin, you go out of freenet and from the web, in the big dark forest, using your browser and all nude, you go to freenet's central servers. and this obviously is traceable and not safe, since you are not using freenet anymore... (of course, doing this, you still can use Tor, or jap for some protection) You could if we asked you about proxies... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] No subject
l...@hushmail.com a écrit : The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked AND that it says, “This is untraceable, safe….” NOW, untraceable means anonymous. The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT ANONYMOUS! The meaning is : “Fetch over Freenet, this is untraceable, safe….: To download the plugin, you use freenet (of course this is safe). “Fetch over the web from Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE To download the plugin, you go out of freenet and from the web, in the big dark forest, using your browser and all nude, you go to freenet's central servers. and this obviously is traceable and not safe, since you are not using freenet anymore... (of course, doing this, you still can use Tor, or jap for some protection) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] No subject
Evan Daniel a écrit : On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM, l...@hushmail.com wrote: Hello. I hope this is OK. It’s quite long. I wonder if anyone can help with this/these question/s-comment/s in the form of clarification. I hope it doesn’t seem too petty but I wonder if others go through the same confusion as I. On this page: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ one can go to: “Load Official Plugin” The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked AND that it says, “This is untraceable, safe….” NOW, untraceable means anonymous. The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT ANONYMOUS! (Freenet isn’t safe?) On this page: FREEMAIL-SETUP http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:u...@xog49gnltumtjjzj0fvzugdpo4hjusy2us GQkjE7NY4,EtUH5b9gGpp8JiY-Bm-Y9kHX1q-yDjD- 9oRzXn21O9k,AQACAAE/freemail/4/setup/index.html It clearly directs one method of using the same plugin page as my beginning comment above (Load Official Plugin), with the “only” comment for that choice being that it is NOT ANONYMOUS! So, is one correct to assume that the first directive is false, misleading and/or has been tampered with (edited) by someone with bad intent? Or is it the second one? One point I am trying to make here is that this can cause some immediate doubt and confusion in someone new to Freenet. I am concerned because the world needs Freenet and Tor more than they might consciously know. I recently saw figures about the estimated number of users for both, and the numbers were very small. They are small enough that large arrays of computers, set around the world and networked, are capable of watching ALL nodes and gathering the data to be analyzed. Look at Tor. On the Network Map (of the world), there are nodes running in sequential order, and all these are located in the same place – near the CIA in the US. Some of these sequential orders are showing up in other locations around the Tor network. I have found Freenet to be so frustrating and confusing to set up and use, that as I search the web for information that is clear and helpful, I keep coming across more comments from Users who are quitting the program. Now it does make sense to me, that with anonymity programs, the more using them, the better and more safely anonymous it is for all. But, it seems the numbers are dwindling. I don’t know. I have used Tor for about 4 years. I recently went to its Hidden Wiki and about one half of all its services were gone! So, I wonder, as do others, is Tor is dying out? I really don’t want to see that for Tor or Freenet. If one goes to: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ first, before finding the .jar or .zip download page (supposedly both are anonymous but of course, IT DOESN’T SAY, then they might make a very bad choice solely from being confused by the directions. So, while this might seem very petty and/or trivial to (I don’t know-most who might read this), it is very important to write directions for the reader, not the writer! In Tor, the Hidden Services may be tampered with, changed, purposely to be misleading and dangerous, by those who want to destroy anonymity and our right to it. They use anonymity to try and destroy anonymity, except for them, of course. Is this also possible with the Freenet pages of “howto’s?” Can they be edited so that one is not aware of what is true, accurate and good for the User? Anyway, I am once more trying to set up Freenet, Freemail and Frost and am close to quitting. If I were more knowledgeable, I would write “howto’s” but I am not. It seems all I am is frustrated. One last thing, at Freemail-Setup, it tells me to download Freemail. The next bit of ‘howto’ is setting it up for “command line version setup”. I’m not doing that. I don’t know the pros and cons of command line Freemail. At the end of that instruction it says, “Now you have Freemail proxy running….” I DO? How? I didn’t do that so what the fuck happened? Does the download set it up or does it have to be set up after it’s downloaded? The latter makes sense to me but, it is now telling me I already have it running without doing anything. So, why the instructions? I mean, C’mon! I have to go by what the writer writes, right? Since it tells me I have it up and running, where is it? I can’t find it. These instructions are telling me to insert the long Freemail address I was given. I was given? When? Where? I haven’t done anything yet but the directions jump from something I don’t want to do and didn’t do, to, “I’m up and running!” This is a joke right? It’s only for those who are IT smart, meaning very few, and anonymity will be shot on site. Just before it gets to THUNDERBIRD, it tells me, “Remember that the Freemail.jar program needs to be running whilst you are reading and sending emails. So, where is it? There is no window to put in any information. Perhaps if I could get some help, yeah, I might be able to help others. Sorry for the rant but
Re: [freenet-support] No subject
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:13 PM, l...@hushmail.com wrote: Hello. I hope this is OK. It’s quite long. I wonder if anyone can help with this/these question/s-comment/s in the form of clarification. I hope it doesn’t seem too petty but I wonder if others go through the same confusion as I. On this page: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ one can go to: “Load Official Plugin” The viewer can see, as did I, that “Fetch over Freenet is checked AND that it says, “This is untraceable, safe….” NOW, untraceable means anonymous. The other choice available is to, “Fetch over the web from Freenet’s central servers…and is “TRACEABLE”, meaning NOT ANONYMOUS! (Freenet isn’t safe?) On this page: FREEMAIL-SETUP http://127.0.0.1:/freenet:u...@xog49gnltumtjjzj0fvzugdpo4hjusy2us GQkjE7NY4,EtUH5b9gGpp8JiY-Bm-Y9kHX1q-yDjD- 9oRzXn21O9k,AQACAAE/freemail/4/setup/index.html It clearly directs one method of using the same plugin page as my beginning comment above (Load Official Plugin), with the “only” comment for that choice being that it is NOT ANONYMOUS! So, is one correct to assume that the first directive is false, misleading and/or has been tampered with (edited) by someone with bad intent? Or is it the second one? One point I am trying to make here is that this can cause some immediate doubt and confusion in someone new to Freenet. I am concerned because the world needs Freenet and Tor more than they might consciously know. I recently saw figures about the estimated number of users for both, and the numbers were very small. They are small enough that large arrays of computers, set around the world and networked, are capable of watching ALL nodes and gathering the data to be analyzed. Look at Tor. On the Network Map (of the world), there are nodes running in sequential order, and all these are located in the same place – near the CIA in the US. Some of these sequential orders are showing up in other locations around the Tor network. I have found Freenet to be so frustrating and confusing to set up and use, that as I search the web for information that is clear and helpful, I keep coming across more comments from Users who are quitting the program. Now it does make sense to me, that with anonymity programs, the more using them, the better and more safely anonymous it is for all. But, it seems the numbers are dwindling. I don’t know. I have used Tor for about 4 years. I recently went to its Hidden Wiki and about one half of all its services were gone! So, I wonder, as do others, is Tor is dying out? I really don’t want to see that for Tor or Freenet. If one goes to: http://127.0.0.1:/plugins/ first, before finding the .jar or .zip download page (supposedly both are anonymous but of course, IT DOESN’T SAY, then they might make a very bad choice solely from being confused by the directions. So, while this might seem very petty and/or trivial to (I don’t know-most who might read this), it is very important to write directions for the reader, not the writer! In Tor, the Hidden Services may be tampered with, changed, purposely to be misleading and dangerous, by those who want to destroy anonymity and our right to it. They use anonymity to try and destroy anonymity, except for them, of course. Is this also possible with the Freenet pages of “howto’s?” Can they be edited so that one is not aware of what is true, accurate and good for the User? Anyway, I am once more trying to set up Freenet, Freemail and Frost and am close to quitting. If I were more knowledgeable, I would write “howto’s” but I am not. It seems all I am is frustrated. One last thing, at Freemail-Setup, it tells me to download Freemail. The next bit of ‘howto’ is setting it up for “command line version setup”. I’m not doing that. I don’t know the pros and cons of command line Freemail. At the end of that instruction it says, “Now you have Freemail proxy running….” I DO? How? I didn’t do that so what the fuck happened? Does the download set it up or does it have to be set up after it’s downloaded? The latter makes sense to me but, it is now telling me I already have it running without doing anything. So, why the instructions? I mean, C’mon! I have to go by what the writer writes, right? Since it tells me I have it up and running, where is it? I can’t find it. These instructions are telling me to insert the long Freemail address I was given. I was given? When? Where? I haven’t done anything yet but the directions jump from something I don’t want to do and didn’t do, to, “I’m up and running!” This is a joke right? It’s only for those who are IT smart, meaning very few, and anonymity will be shot on site. Just before it gets to THUNDERBIRD, it tells me, “Remember that the Freemail.jar program needs to be running whilst you are reading and sending emails. So, where is it? There is no window to put in any information. Perhaps if I could get some help,
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
\So, you should simply be able to configure your browser to connect using SOCKS4 or SOCKS5 via localhost:81 and then you can access fproxy as if you were on the remote ssh server at http://localhost:\; Brilliant thanks! It was working all along , I just never thought to connect to localhost! haha! I now have a server running reliably and remotely 24/7, and accessible from anywhere - lovely :-) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:14:18 +, Jago Pearce wrote: This is my setup: 1) client computer with ssh forwarding on port 81 (ssh -D81) enabled conecting through 2) A proxy at address Proxy:8080 3) Connectng to my shell server runnig shh on port 443 If I login with ssh I can use lynx to browse freenet but that isn\'t very good. How can I browse freenet remotely this way? I'm not sure how to work with the (SOCKS) proxy, but you can forward the port directly like: ssh -L :localhost: freenetusern...@freenetbox And then use any browser through http://localhost: ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:33:57 +0100 bqz69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zn1P (I am the author of www.minihowto.org, and I have tried to make documentation along your lines - it's not very easy?) LOL you may have recognized the nickname, and possibly the writing style: I am the author of FAFS (Freenet Applications FreeSite) And yes it IS easy: always assume that the reader doesn't know what you're talking about, that English is not his native language, that his education is below average, and he's a retard. So you get relatively few 'could you explain a little better...' questions. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:42:11 + (GMT) Markus Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Sorry if I explain things that you know already, but I don't know what your general competence level is, so I'll assume you know very little, just in case (and it may be useful for someone else, too) I am able to reach and open some of the sites I want to, but frequently I get the message that a site seems to be unreachable, sometimes concerning a site that opens some minutes later. This is expected on a newly estabilshed node. The first thing to do to get a new node to work better is to set the max store size and max memory usage (both in your config page at http://localhost:/config). But first lets talk about uptime quickly: Freenet needs to sun as much as possible. The optimal would be to let it run 24/7, but morning to night every day is also fairly good. What you DON'T want to do is 'start freenet - visit freesite - shut down freenet'. It won't work. Freesites will take ages to load (when they do) and you'll be damaging the netwrotk. Let freenet run as much as your computer runs, and if you don't have an always-up box, consider letting your computer run just for the sake of freenet. the more Freenet stays up, the better your node will work, and themore it will help the network. Back to configuration; as we said, you should set store size and max memory usage to higher values than the defaults. You may have done that when you went through the Freenet First.time Wizard, but if you kept the defaults your store size and memory usage are very low because the defaults must work for everyone including users running on a junkware boxes in countries where they don't consider 700MhZ and 256MB RAM a low-end machine. The values are different according to your box and the usage you make of it, but the rule of is 'the more the better'. See how much HDD space you can dedicate to Freenet and set your store size to that; some have dedicated Freenet disks 500GB or 1TB in size, others have 250+ GB freenet stores, but 50GB is already fairly good. Remember than the bigger the store the better your node will work, because more stuff will be cached (encrypted) locally and will be fetched way more quickly when request it. As for max memory usage, you can set this even higher than can afford in theory, becuse freenet won't allocate all the memory you give to it. High max mem values are needed in my experience because mem usage will peak sometimes and if it tries to use more memory than it's allowed to use, the node may crash. Those who operate machnes with 3 or more GB of RAM are known to set max memory usage up to 2GB. My node runs on box that only has 1GB of RAM, Freenet is set to use max 770MB of it, and the node works pretty well. I used to run nodes on virtual machines with max memory usage set to 256MB and they worked pretty well as long as I didn't queue too many or too large files for download/upload; therefore, if you are limited by the physical memory installed on your box, (for instance you can't set max mem. usage to anything higher than 256 or even 128MB) you will have to run few downloads/uploads at a time (wait for them to complete, then add more). Remember it's not the number of files, it's the total size. Bandwidth usage settings are kind of relative. If you have a good connection (10MB+ high upload BW) you can set your bandwidth usage as high as your total bandwidth and freenet will never use but a fraction of that, but if your connection is medium-low, you'll need to limit freenet BW usage. In my experience trying to help new users get started, I've seen that the difference between upload and download bandwidth may be a problem. ISP' tout high speed connections without ever mentioning anything about upload bandwidth. As an example, a connection that the ISP refers to as '12Mbit/s' never does what the ISP says it should: first of all 12MB/s (1.5MB/s) is a nominal value, the actual bandwidth rarely exceeds 2/3 of the nominal value stated by ISP (more often half of it), and most importnat, the higghly publicized 12Mbit/s is only the download bandwidth. They never say anything about upload speed. If you're lucky you have 2Mbit/s but ,more often 1Mbit/s fot 'high speed' connections and 512 or 256 Kbit/s for medium range connections. So, the point is, find out what your -upload- stream in KB/s is (find out what your ISP say your upstream is, then divide by 8 to get bytes; ISP's always talk about bits). Decide how much bandwidth you can afford to give freenet in upload and set that value under max bandwidth usage in config page. As for download bandwidth you may want to keep the defult -1, meaning 4x the upstream. If you are one of the few lucky that have high upload bandwidths (as high as download), you may want to set the same value for both upload and download. I am totally new in this subject and all my real-world-friends are no-techies and no-nerds,
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Please, when replying to newbies, CC them, because they're often not subscribed to the list. I've bounced your message to the poster. On Tuesday 18 November 2008 12:26, Luke771 wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:42:11 + (GMT) Markus Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Sorry if I explain things that you know already, but I don't know what your general competence level is, so I'll assume you know very little, just in case (and it may be useful for someone else, too) I am able to reach and open some of the sites I want to, but frequently I get the message that a site seems to be unreachable, sometimes concerning a site that opens some minutes later. This is expected on a newly estabilshed node. The first thing to do to get a new node to work better is to set the max store size and max memory usage (both in your config page at http://localhost:/config). But first lets talk about uptime quickly: Freenet needs to sun as much as possible. The optimal would be to let it run 24/7, but morning to night every day is also fairly good. What you DON'T want to do is 'start freenet - visit freesite - shut down freenet'. It won't work. Freesites will take ages to load (when they do) and you'll be damaging the netwrotk. Let freenet run as much as your computer runs, and if you don't have an always-up box, consider letting your computer run just for the sake of freenet. the more Freenet stays up, the better your node will work, and themore it will help the network. Back to configuration; as we said, you should set store size and max memory usage to higher values than the defaults. You may have done that when you went through the Freenet First.time Wizard, but if you kept the defaults your store size and memory usage are very low because the defaults must work for everyone including users running on a junkware boxes in countries where they don't consider 700MhZ and 256MB RAM a low-end machine. The values are different according to your box and the usage you make of it, but the rule of is 'the more the better'. See how much HDD space you can dedicate to Freenet and set your store size to that; some have dedicated Freenet disks 500GB or 1TB in size, others have 250+ GB freenet stores, but 50GB is already fairly good. Remember than the bigger the store the better your node will work, because more stuff will be cached (encrypted) locally and will be fetched way more quickly when request it. As for max memory usage, you can set this even higher than can afford in theory, becuse freenet won't allocate all the memory you give to it. High max mem values are needed in my experience because mem usage will peak sometimes and if it tries to use more memory than it's allowed to use, the node may crash. Those who operate machnes with 3 or more GB of RAM are known to set max memory usage up to 2GB. My node runs on box that only has 1GB of RAM, Freenet is set to use max 770MB of it, and the node works pretty well. I used to run nodes on virtual machines with max memory usage set to 256MB and they worked pretty well as long as I didn't queue too many or too large files for download/upload; therefore, if you are limited by the physical memory installed on your box, (for instance you can't set max mem. usage to anything higher than 256 or even 128MB) you will have to run few downloads/uploads at a time (wait for them to complete, then add more). Remember it's not the number of files, it's the total size. Bandwidth usage settings are kind of relative. If you have a good connection (10MB+ high upload BW) you can set your bandwidth usage as high as your total bandwidth and freenet will never use but a fraction of that, but if your connection is medium-low, you'll need to limit freenet BW usage. In my experience trying to help new users get started, I've seen that the difference between upload and download bandwidth may be a problem. ISP' tout high speed connections without ever mentioning anything about upload bandwidth. As an example, a connection that the ISP refers to as '12Mbit/s' never does what the ISP says it should: first of all 12MB/s (1.5MB/s) is a nominal value, the actual bandwidth rarely exceeds 2/3 of the nominal value stated by ISP (more often half of it), and most importnat, the higghly publicized 12Mbit/s is only the download bandwidth. They never say anything about upload speed. If you're lucky you have 2Mbit/s but ,more often 1Mbit/s fot 'high speed' connections and 512 or 256 Kbit/s for medium range connections. So, the point is, find out what your -upload- stream in KB/s is (find out what your ISP say your upstream is, then divide by 8 to get bytes; ISP's always talk about bits). Decide how much bandwidth you can afford to give freenet in upload and set that value under max bandwidth usage in config page. As for download bandwidth you may want to keep the defult -1, meaning 4x the upstream. If you are one of the few lucky
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 13.26.01 Luke771 wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:42:11 + (GMT) Markus Hahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Sorry if I explain things that you know already, but I don't know what your general competence level is, so I'll assume you know very little, just in case (and it may be useful for someone else, too) I am able to reach and open some of the sites I want to, but frequently I get the message that a site seems to be unreachable, sometimes concerning a site that opens some minutes later. This is expected on a newly estabilshed node. The first thing to do to get a new node to work better is to set the max store size and max memory usage (both in your config page at http://localhost:/config). But first lets talk about uptime quickly: Freenet needs to sun as much as ++ I like your answer, that's the way a lot more stuff of the internet should be explained (better more than less details), in order for ordinary people to learn. Thanks - *smile* (I am the author of www.minihowto.org, and I have tried to make documentation along your lines - it's not very easy?) ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it won't go away and is still present. : In any case we need to be told if it happens after Sunday. snip Ok Matthew, Seems to be still there even with version 1179. 11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are: 70.72.215.120:40858 212.202.31.3:43592 217.196.213.98:24330 88.175.66.28:52590 87.179.226.176:50173 217.153.12.122:50554 212.75.37.89:53150 85.229.124.96:13598 96.250.239.134:64676 86.54.216.133:53061 79.202.89.5:39002 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Monday 17 November 2008 20:27:13 Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 18:37:20 Matthew Toseland wrote: Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it won't go away and is still present. : In any case we need to be told if it happens after Sunday. snip Ok Matthew, Seems to be still there even with version 1179. 11 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are: 70.72.215.120:40858 212.202.31.3:43592 217.196.213.98:24330 88.175.66.28:52590 87.179.226.176:50173 217.153.12.122:50554 212.75.37.89:53150 85.229.124.96:13598 96.250.239.134:64676 86.54.216.133:53061 79.202.89.5:39002 ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, node uptime is 3 hours now. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote: 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are: My Node * Freenet 0.7 Build #1178 r23592M * Freenet-ext Build #24 r23199 snip sig Got the same message with the same build of freenet. But I've got 4 peers reported to have severe problems. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote: 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are: My Node * Freenet 0.7 Build #1178 r23592M * Freenet-ext Build #24 r23199 snip sig Got the same message with the same build of freenet. But I've got 4 peers reported to have severe problems. snip sig Ok I didn't read the other new messages on the list before I read this one. So it is to be expected that this message is gone after Sunday when the new version of freenet is mandatory? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Correct. This should go away after 1178 is mandatory on Sunday, provided you restart your node at that point. However, the trend so far suggests that it won't go away and is still present. : In any case we need to be told if it happens after Sunday. On Saturday 15 November 2008 08:54, Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 09:48:26 Peter J. wrote: On Saturday 15 November 2008 01:05:57 Mike Cook wrote: 2 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node you are running. The affected peers (you may not want to include this in your bug report if they are darknet peers) are: My Node * Freenet 0.7 Build #1178 r23592M * Freenet-ext Build #24 r23199 snip sig Got the same message with the same build of freenet. But I've got 4 peers reported to have severe problems. snip sig Ok I didn't read the other new messages on the list before I read this one. So it is to be expected that this message is gone after Sunday when the new version of freenet is mandatory? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpn7V3QtXSJl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Sunday 22 June 2008 03:56, Hierophant wrote: I've recently implemented a Freenet opennet node via XeroBank 2.0 http://xerobank.com and would appreciate comments, especially regarding performance and security. XeroBank 2.0 is a commercial broadband descendant of Tor. XeroBank is apparently incorporated in Panama. Although XeroBank's website has short bios on its key staff, I have not found any information regarding its owners. XeroBank access costs $35 per month for 75 Gb at ca. 1.5 Mb/sec download and ca. 0.5 Mb/sec upload. Clients are assigned both access and deposit account numbers, and only deposit-account-to-access-account transactions are supposedly possible. Also, payments to XeroBank are anonymized via Dalpay in Iceland, and so even deposit accounts are supposedly anonymous. Multiple machines can access XeroBank simultaneously, and each machine (real and/or virtual) has a separate encrypted VPN channel to its network. There are currently exit nodes in Canada and the Netherlands. The IP of an exit node persists until the originating VPN channel terminates. I've corresponded with Steve Topletz, one of XeroBank's technical consultants, and he's assured me that running a Freenet doesn't violate its terms of service unless doing so generates upstream complaints. For those who don't know of Steve Topletz, he's a veteran of Cult of the Dead Cow and Hacktivismo, and was active in Tor development. There are interviews with him on darkREADING http://tinyurl.com/6y6eju, NowPublic http://tinyurl.com/5donxb and the American Chronicle http://tinyurl.com/558ngj. As I understand XeroBank, only entities capable of global correlation attacks can trace traffic between its entry and exit nodes. Being a private network, XeroBank doesn't share Tor's key vulnerability to evil exit nodes. According to XeroBank's Privacy Policy http://xerobank.com/privacy_policy.php, it does not log IPs or activity unless there is evidence of malicious activity which violates its terms of service and/or human rights, or unless it's been compelled by court orders of all applicable jurisdictions for all specific servers (which are in multiple countries). Lack of IP anonymity is the key vulnerability of Freenet in insecure mode, and even for darknets if they're compromised. By running this node via XeroBank, none of my opennet peers knows my true IP. And given that each machine connects via a separate VPN and has a distinct exit IP, I can run a second node that connects only to my opennet node, and use only that node for accessing Freenet. As I understand Freenet, the activities of that draknet node would not be visible to any of my opennet peers. I'm currently running my main node using Freenet 0.7 Build #1152 r20268 in a virtual Win XP SP2 machine on a PGP-encrypted partition, using Java Version 1.6.0_06 and JVM Version 10.0-b22. There's now a XeroBank 2.0 version of xB Machine, and I'll switch to that shortly. The Win XP machine has one CPU, 1 Gb memory and a 30 Gb hard disk. The node has one CPU, 512 Mb memory, a 20 Gb datastore and bandwidth limits of 50 Kbps output and 100 Kbps input. The node has been up for over two days, and has generally had ca. 5-10 peers. Output and input rates have generally been ca. 25-50 Kbps. Freenet provides many other statistics, but I'm not going to dump them all here. However, given that I do want help optimizing this node's performance, I'll be happy to provide whatever non-compromising information that's requested. Hierophant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cool. However I would point out that there is an entire industry dedicated to reversing money anonymisation schemes. pgpBG4rHN5Ssy.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 10:56:41PM -0700, Isaac Karjala wrote: Does Freenet work with Dynamic IP's? Yes, most people on Freenet have dynamic IPs. If you are behind a router, you should consider forwarding the freenet UDP listen port (FNP port number on /config/); this isn't strictly necessary but it will help sometimes. Also some people use www.dyndns.com or similar services; this again can help sometimes, but isn't really necessary, and introduces a single point of attack (dyndns). -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
LOL. Seriously, yes you can. Install freenet 0.7, get some references from #freenet-refs , then start up fproxy on http://127.0.0.1:/ and click on Darknet Index to see what's available through Freenet's internal web, and open up Frost to chat and exchange even more files. Note that we do not endorse piracy in any shape or form, or any other illegal activity. If you ask about files which are obviously illegal when asking for technical support, you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RECEIVE HELP FROM PROJECT STAFF. On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:51:41AM -0400, Evan Daniel wrote: Yes. On 7/8/06, jiao lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I upload and download files from freenet? J -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Yes. On 7/8/06, jiao lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I upload and download files from freenet? J ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
That depends on what you mean. The objective of freenet is that it be very difficult for an attacker to determine who is posting, or reading, a particular freesite or Frost post. Also freenet 0.7, if used properly, makes it difficult for an attacker to discover that you are running a freenet node. However you can only have this protection against discovery, and protection from various attacks, if you use 0.7 as a darknet i.e. you connect only to people you know/trust already. In any case, you are more vulnerable to somebody whose node you are connected to than to somebody you are not connected to. Now, the present implementation does have weaknesses, as it is only an alpha. However, that is our objective, and we have gone some way towards it. On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:25:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
You wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address? Freenet is indeed very secure. The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7 As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting. Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn. While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it. The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity. BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP. If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites. The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
If I was to be identified, could my IP addresswith aservice provider match that with an IP address in .07?. - Original Message From: Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc: support@freenetproject.orgSent: Friday, 7 July, 2006 10:05:17 PMSubject: Re: [freenet-support] (No subject) You wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address?Freenet is indeed very secure.The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting.Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn.While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it.The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity.BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP.If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites.The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet.___Support mailing listSupport@freenetproject.orghttp://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.supportUnsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/supportOr mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (No subject)
Absolutely ANY service you use on the internet will at some point have to see your IP address. This is how the internet works - in order for 2 peers to communicate they must know each other's IP addresses. Freenet disguises a) the fact that you are using freenet, and b) what you are doing on freenet (which files you are fetching or inserting). On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:45:11PM +0200, jing bling wrote: If I was to be identified, could my IP address with a service provider match that with an IP address in .07?. - Original Message From: Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: support@freenetproject.org Sent: Friday, 7 July, 2006 10:05:17 PM Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (No subject) You wrote: I am interested to know is free net so secure that a person cannot be tracked by their IP address or email address? Freenet is indeed very secure. The most any attacker or snoop can determine is that you are running a freenet node and even that is less likely than ever with 0.7 As long as you use sensible, basic precautions to secure your machine and do not insert material that contains clues to your identity then it is absolutely not possible to determine WHAT you are inserting. Check out Frost, it's message boards are forever full of people ranting on about pedophiles and child porn. While CP posters are vile, they do server a function in freenet as much as many would like not to admit it. The fact that CP can be posted so freely in freenet means that it is secure enough and anonymous enough to protect even vile people's identity. BTW- you don't have to support or approve of CP to be involved in freenet, and your involvment says nothing about your stance on CP. If you don't like it, then don't support it by requesting any CP files or sites. The fewer people who request something, the more likely it'll drop out of freenet. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
every time that i'm using the url irc.freenet it's asking me for a user name and password. how can i get / sign up for the username. thanks alot, Edo. I don't know where you try to connect, but Freenet irc channels are on irc.freenode.net (and not irc.freenet) and their names are #freenet and #freenet-refs. -- Jerome Flesch. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)
From: boyonedar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: support@freenetproject.org To: support@freenetproject.org Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:06:56 -0500 I downloaded freenet. I went to main page and sometimes I can get into links and other times it times out. When I can get into links and get to files it rarely get through download without timing out. any help here... Thanks boy ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Details would be interesting. What is the average time a connection lasts for? Are these connections from nodes which are in the routing table? Normally we won't accept a new connection if many of our existing connections are new, and they remain that way for quite some time. On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:20:51PM -0700, Vanessa wrote: I hope you will make the 0.7 version strong enough to not have a problem with massive number incoming connections. The i/o at muxing level (I have seen it, I will spare you my critique, it has given you enough trouble, I can see) in the current 5.something stable version is not able to stand against 60 incoming connection attempts per 90 seconds on average. I modded the node so that it is able to stand against it and get healthy connection lfe times. If you are interested in that mod you should let me know. Same goes for feeding FuqidOnSteroids the number of inbound and outbound connections (easy). ShitList is a bit harder and not complete yet and help would be appreciated. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT) David Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [spam that doesn't even resolve] __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around There's a joke here somewhere... ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)
The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right to call witnesses, and the right to counsel. The fourth amendment is the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. And I've never suggested we ditch or add anything. Laws preventing you from transmitting illegal material are already on the books and have been affirmed many times. PS: Bounced to chat as per toad's request -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 12:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] (no subject) Importance: Low I'd think the sixth admendment (protection from unreasionable search and seizure) helps people get away with crimes all the time. Should we ditch that too? ~Paul On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:55:58 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be. If it was it would be almost impossible to arrest anyone. All you would need to do is have someone ask you to do it beforehand. Someone asks you to hold their box of drugs. Oh but you didn't know what was in the box it must be a big mistake. Someone asks you to help him into his locked house. Oh but you didn't know that it wasn't his house. Someone asks you to hide him from the cops. I guess it's alright because you didn't know he committed a crime. If you allow people to hide behind the fact that they simply didn't know with 100% certainty that what they were doing was a crime no one would ever be guilty. It's called personal responsibility, if your doing something it's up to you to ensure its legal. Someone that has drug deals happen in his yard does have a defense. He didn't let them. If he had said 'Sure come on in and use my yard to deal drugs' (like when you run a freenet node) then he would be guilty. Ignoring an obvious crime is not a crime, you can watch someone get shot and killed if you wanted. Ignoring your obvious crime however is quite punishable. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) Importance: Low On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED]| (Matthew Findley) writes | Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work. | First I should probably clear this up. I am not a lawyer. I work at the | U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is | legal advice, the postion of the DOJ, to be considered an offical | interpretation of the laws, ect In other words, you were reprimanded at work for stirring up shit from an @usdoj.gov email address and now it's time to interject the disclaimers. If you weren't yet, you will be. I've been in a similar position, though not quite exactly the same, I made the same mistake, using a uniform email address in a civilian conversation, and I've felt the heat for it. On the one hand, I sympathize with you. Why would Anonymous issue an apology? Because even Anonymous can and perhaps will be identified via linguistic analysis, though I've done my best to pervert this message in such a manner that it cannot be connected with its author. On the other hand, I must assert that whomever initiated or will initiate the stink, it didn't start or won't start with me. Although, believe me, I have considered it since your first post to this list from an official address, and long before the current thread was borne. You go on to state | Let me put it this way. When you all fire up your nodes you know there | is a very strong likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting | illegal material, correct? I would ask Who is 'you all'? and I would posit that the response is not 'correct.' (I would also insert a 'you people' and 'H Perot' reference, but that would be controversial and too demonstrable of knowledge of U.S. politics, no?) Freenet is comprised of a wide variety of users. Many of those users whom have been and continue to remain early adopters of Freenet are those same people what were and continue to be early adopters of other emerging technologies. They're in it for the tech, they're in it for the ideals, they're in it to support the ability of oppressed citizenries (I must wonder if that now applies to you in the States?) to have the continued freedom to express their ideas. And for fuck's sakes, some of them are just in it for the challenge of programming something new in Java. More to a point, there are Freenet node operators what have no idea that they may end up storing or transmitting illicit material. There are Freenet node operators what have been convinced by acquaintances to try out a new software program, one which is at the bleeding edge of networking, one which hopes to offer anonymity to its
OT** Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Friday 06 August 2004 10:16 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The sixth amendment is the right to a public and speedy trial, the right to call witnesses, and the right to counsel. The fourth amendment is the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. And I've never suggested we ditch or add anything. Laws preventing you from transmitting illegal material are already on the books and have been affirmed many times. [snip] OT.. keep it on chat.. this doesn't even belong in Tech. -- Jay Oliveri GnuPG ID: 0x5AA5DD54 FCPTools Maintainer www.sf.net/users/joliveri ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Hmmm. Go to http://127.0.0.1:/ . What build number is it running? Go to Advanced mode. Then try again, and show me exactly what it says on the Route Not Found error page. On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I keep on getting the error message: Couldn't Retrieve Key Couldn't connect to the network. Are you sure you have configured Freenet correctly? Also make sure that you are connected to the internet. Retrying... And I cant figure out how to get it to work..I was behind a linksys router but I unplugged that and hooked my computer up directly to the DSL modem and I closed zonealarm. Can you help me out? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be. If it was it would be almost impossible to arrest anyone. All you would need to do is have someone ask you to do it beforehand. Someone asks you to hold their box of drugs. Oh but you didn't know what was in the box it must be a big mistake. Someone asks you to help him into his locked house. Oh but you didn't know that it wasn't his house. Someone asks you to hide him from the cops. I guess it's alright because you didn't know he committed a crime. If you allow people to hide behind the fact that they simply didn't know with 100% certainty that what they were doing was a crime no one would ever be guilty. It's called personal responsibility, if your doing something it's up to you to ensure its legal. Someone that has drug deals happen in his yard does have a defense. He didn't let them. If he had said 'Sure come on in and use my yard to deal drugs' (like when you run a freenet node) then he would be guilty. Ignoring an obvious crime is not a crime, you can watch someone get shot and killed if you wanted. Ignoring your obvious crime however is quite punishable. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) Importance: Low On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED]| (Matthew Findley) writes | Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work. | First I should probably clear this up. I am not a lawyer. I work at the | U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is | legal advice, the postion of the DOJ, to be considered an offical | interpretation of the laws, ect In other words, you were reprimanded at work for stirring up shit from an @usdoj.gov email address and now it's time to interject the disclaimers. If you weren't yet, you will be. I've been in a similar position, though not quite exactly the same, I made the same mistake, using a uniform email address in a civilian conversation, and I've felt the heat for it. On the one hand, I sympathize with you. Why would Anonymous issue an apology? Because even Anonymous can and perhaps will be identified via linguistic analysis, though I've done my best to pervert this message in such a manner that it cannot be connected with its author. On the other hand, I must assert that whomever initiated or will initiate the stink, it didn't start or won't start with me. Although, believe me, I have considered it since your first post to this list from an official address, and long before the current thread was borne. You go on to state | Let me put it this way. When you all fire up your nodes you know there | is a very strong likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting | illegal material, correct? I would ask Who is 'you all'? and I would posit that the response is not 'correct.' (I would also insert a 'you people' and 'H Perot' reference, but that would be controversial and too demonstrable of knowledge of U.S. politics, no?) Freenet is comprised of a wide variety of users. Many of those users whom have been and continue to remain early adopters of Freenet are those same people what were and continue to be early adopters of other emerging technologies. They're in it for the tech, they're in it for the ideals, they're in it to support the ability of oppressed citizenries (I must wonder if that now applies to you in the States?) to have the continued freedom to express their ideas. And for fuck's sakes, some of them are just in it for the challenge of programming something new in Java. More to a point, there are Freenet node operators what have no idea that they may end up storing or transmitting illicit material. There are Freenet node operators what have been convinced by acquaintances to try out a new software program, one which is at the bleeding edge of networking, one which hopes to offer anonymity to its users, and what have installed Freenet to this very end. There are Freenet node operators what run a node but don't make any use of its existance. There are Freenet node operators what run a node simply because they have a machine with a nice linkup and a friend what asked a favor of them. You made a statement | The fact is that everyone knows there lots of illegal stuff floating | around freenet, and one can simply not avoid responsibility for a | crime by deliberately ignoring what is obvious. Although I'm not under your jurisdiction, I live in a country what seems to have a keen and cooperative eye on what the States consider to be the latest incarnation of Truth and Justice. As such this statement makes my skin crawl on its end. Even more so that it was made from an official of the Department of U.S. Justice. You are saying that a resident of a disadvantaged community has no defense that a drugs deal was committed in his yard, because he
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
I'd think the sixth admendment (protection from unreasionable search and seizure) helps people get away with crimes all the time. Should we ditch that too? ~Paul On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:55:58 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ignorance is not a defense and nor should it be. If it was it would be almost impossible to arrest anyone. All you would need to do is have someone ask you to do it beforehand. Someone asks you to hold their box of drugs. Oh but you didn't know what was in the box it must be a big mistake. Someone asks you to help him into his locked house. Oh but you didn't know that it wasn't his house. Someone asks you to hide him from the cops. I guess it's alright because you didn't know he committed a crime. If you allow people to hide behind the fact that they simply didn't know with 100% certainty that what they were doing was a crime no one would ever be guilty. It's called personal responsibility, if your doing something it's up to you to ensure its legal. Someone that has drug deals happen in his yard does have a defense. He didn't let them. If he had said 'Sure come on in and use my yard to deal drugs' (like when you run a freenet node) then he would be guilty. Ignoring an obvious crime is not a crime, you can watch someone get shot and killed if you wanted. Ignoring your obvious crime however is quite punishable. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 5:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) Importance: Low On 5 Aug 2004 04:42:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED]| (Matthew Findley) writes | Let me see if I can get caught up on whats gone on since I left work. | First I should probably clear this up. I am not a lawyer. I work at the | U.S. Attoreny's Office yes; but, only as a clerk. So nothing I say is | legal advice, the postion of the DOJ, to be considered an offical | interpretation of the laws, ect In other words, you were reprimanded at work for stirring up shit from an @usdoj.gov email address and now it's time to interject the disclaimers. If you weren't yet, you will be. I've been in a similar position, though not quite exactly the same, I made the same mistake, using a uniform email address in a civilian conversation, and I've felt the heat for it. On the one hand, I sympathize with you. Why would Anonymous issue an apology? Because even Anonymous can and perhaps will be identified via linguistic analysis, though I've done my best to pervert this message in such a manner that it cannot be connected with its author. On the other hand, I must assert that whomever initiated or will initiate the stink, it didn't start or won't start with me. Although, believe me, I have considered it since your first post to this list from an official address, and long before the current thread was borne. You go on to state | Let me put it this way. When you all fire up your nodes you know there | is a very strong likelyhood that it will end up houseing and transmiting | illegal material, correct? I would ask Who is 'you all'? and I would posit that the response is not 'correct.' (I would also insert a 'you people' and 'H Perot' reference, but that would be controversial and too demonstrable of knowledge of U.S. politics, no?) Freenet is comprised of a wide variety of users. Many of those users whom have been and continue to remain early adopters of Freenet are those same people what were and continue to be early adopters of other emerging technologies. They're in it for the tech, they're in it for the ideals, they're in it to support the ability of oppressed citizenries (I must wonder if that now applies to you in the States?) to have the continued freedom to express their ideas. And for fuck's sakes, some of them are just in it for the challenge of programming something new in Java. More to a point, there are Freenet node operators what have no idea that they may end up storing or transmitting illicit material. There are Freenet node operators what have been convinced by acquaintances to try out a new software program, one which is at the bleeding edge of networking, one which hopes to offer anonymity to its users, and what have installed Freenet to this very end. There are Freenet node operators what run a node but don't make any use of its existance. There are Freenet node operators what run a node simply because they have a machine with a nice linkup and a friend what asked a favor of them. You made a statement | The fact is that everyone knows there lots of illegal stuff floating | around freenet, and one can simply not avoid responsibility for a | crime by deliberately ignoring what is obvious. Although I'm not under your jurisdiction, I live in a country what seems to have a keen and cooperative eye on what the States
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 05:57:25PM -0400, Peter E. Urban Jr. wrote: Clear Dayjust found your software, but can not do anythingi.e. couldn't retrieve key any of them did not work help thanks Pete Firstly, please don't use HTML mail, if you can avoid it, when talking to us. Secondly, what exactly happened? Thirdly, you can help us a lot by: Load http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html in your web browser. Copy the top of the table at the top into an email and send it to us. Example: mine is: Number of known routing nodes 390 Number of node references 384 Number of newbie nodes 31 Number of uncontactable nodes 26 Contacted and attempted to contact node references 283 Contacted node references 134 Contacted newbie node references31 Connections with Successful Transfers 96 Backed off nodes63 Connection Attempts 178 Successful Connections 22 (the stuff below this point is less important). -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] no subject
Ooops, actually just had to restart the node with the stop/start sh script and the real memory being used was 138MB. Can the real memory used be limited? If the real memory limit is set at 100MB will the web client crap out at that level? Is the freenet web client crappping out because of the over all system memory, or is the Java application failing because of the over all system memory. May node has 640MB total and 20Gig of disk space (most not used) and the system does not crash as long as I keep Java 1.4.1 installed. All the same behaviors occurred as above except the whole system would crash when when Java 1.4.2 is installed. Otherwise, Freenet looks like it's running much better with build 5072, but there are still lots of sites which are not very reachable even after days of trying. On 3/2/04 6:15 PM, Howard White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool. One more thing, my node running Mac OS X 10.3.2 with Java 1.4.1 will run fine most of the day with the open connection page showing some 100K messages sent and 50K received. But once the 10.3.2 activity monitor real memory reaches about 160MB of real memory used, Freenet's web client can't make contact with the server. The system does not crash under Java 1.4.1, but the Freenet node needs to be restart from the stop/start-freenet.sh scripts. On 3/2/04 3:43 PM, mm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 02.03.2004, at 19:40, Howard White wrote: Has anyone successfully run their freenet node on Mac OS X 10.3.2 (Panther) after installing Apple's Java 1.4.2 upgrade. I've been running 10.3.2 but with Java 1.4.1 because after an upgrade to 1.4.2 the system would crash hard requiring a power cycle reboot. I called Apple support but they had not heard of Java 1.4.1 or 1.4.2 resulting in a crash. -- I have the same problem. After starting my freenet node, it normally doesn't take long until the system crashes. I sent Apple the crash.logs, but I heard nothing from them, since. I have Java version 1.4.2_03 installed. For now I run the node on an old linux-box :-( Gruss Goetz Becker ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard White Ast. Director Web Services University Relations Northeastern University Phone 617-512-2158 FAX 617-373-5430 ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] no subject
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Howard White wrote: Otherwise, Freenet looks like it's running much better with build 5072, but there are still lots of sites which are not very reachable even after days of trying. If the sites are running build 5065 or earlier you will not be able to communicate with them because your node regards their version as too old. -- Jim Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel +44 117 982 0786 mobile +44 797 373 7881 Be liberal in what you accept,Jon Postel and conservative in what you send. RFC 793 http://jxcl.sourceforge.net Java unit test coverage http://xlattice.sourceforge.net p2p communications infrastructure ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] no subject
Are there some known general rules by which I can judge the health and vitality of my node. Maybe base of the Node Information navigation area. Like how many blocked is too freak'n many? Like how many messages send/received is to few? Like how much bandwidth should be used for a cable modem? On 3/3/04 9:39 AM, Howard White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ooops, actually just had to restart the node with the stop/start sh script and the real memory being used was 138MB. Can the real memory used be limited? If the real memory limit is set at 100MB will the web client crap out at that level? Is the freenet web client crappping out because of the over all system memory, or is the Java application failing because of the over all system memory. May node has 640MB total and 20Gig of disk space (most not used) and the system does not crash as long as I keep Java 1.4.1 installed. All the same behaviors occurred as above except the whole system would crash when when Java 1.4.2 is installed. Otherwise, Freenet looks like it's running much better with build 5072, but there are still lots of sites which are not very reachable even after days of trying. On 3/2/04 6:15 PM, Howard White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool. One more thing, my node running Mac OS X 10.3.2 with Java 1.4.1 will run fine most of the day with the open connection page showing some 100K messages sent and 50K received. But once the 10.3.2 activity monitor real memory reaches about 160MB of real memory used, Freenet's web client can't make contact with the server. The system does not crash under Java 1.4.1, but the Freenet node needs to be restart from the stop/start-freenet.sh scripts. On 3/2/04 3:43 PM, mm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 02.03.2004, at 19:40, Howard White wrote: Has anyone successfully run their freenet node on Mac OS X 10.3.2 (Panther) after installing Apple's Java 1.4.2 upgrade. I've been running 10.3.2 but with Java 1.4.1 because after an upgrade to 1.4.2 the system would crash hard requiring a power cycle reboot. I called Apple support but they had not heard of Java 1.4.1 or 1.4.2 resulting in a crash. -- I have the same problem. After starting my freenet node, it normally doesn't take long until the system crashes. I sent Apple the crash.logs, but I heard nothing from them, since. I have Java version 1.4.2_03 installed. For now I run the node on an old linux-box :-( Gruss Goetz Becker ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] no subject
On 02.03.2004, at 19:40, Howard White wrote: Has anyone successfully run their freenet node on Mac OS X 10.3.2 (Panther) after installing Apple's Java 1.4.2 upgrade. I've been running 10.3.2 but with Java 1.4.1 because after an upgrade to 1.4.2 the system would crash hard requiring a power cycle reboot. I called Apple support but they had not heard of Java 1.4.1 or 1.4.2 resulting in a crash. -- I have the same problem. After starting my freenet node, it normally doesn't take long until the system crashes. I sent Apple the crash.logs, but I heard nothing from them, since. I have Java version 1.4.2_03 installed. For now I run the node on an old linux-box :-( Gruss Goetz Becker ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] no subject
Cool. One more thing, my node running Mac OS X 10.3.2 with Java 1.4.1 will run fine most of the day with the open connection page showing some 100K messages sent and 50K received. But once the 10.3.2 activity monitor real memory reaches about 160MB of real memory used, Freenet's web client can't make contact with the server. The system does not crash under Java 1.4.1, but the Freenet node needs to be restart from the stop/start-freenet.sh scripts. On 3/2/04 3:43 PM, mm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 02.03.2004, at 19:40, Howard White wrote: Has anyone successfully run their freenet node on Mac OS X 10.3.2 (Panther) after installing Apple's Java 1.4.2 upgrade. I've been running 10.3.2 but with Java 1.4.1 because after an upgrade to 1.4.2 the system would crash hard requiring a power cycle reboot. I called Apple support but they had not heard of Java 1.4.1 or 1.4.2 resulting in a crash. -- I have the same problem. After starting my freenet node, it normally doesn't take long until the system crashes. I sent Apple the crash.logs, but I heard nothing from them, since. I have Java version 1.4.2_03 installed. For now I run the node on an old linux-box :-( Gruss Goetz Becker ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Howard White Ast. Director Web Services University Relations Northeastern University Phone 617-512-2158 FAX 617-373-5430 ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 03:43:44PM +0100, Denis Mazin wrote: Please, leave me off your mailing list. Think's Whose mailing list? [EMAIL PROTECTED]? It's really not that hard to unsubcribe you know. Here are the headers from your email (this is a common way to show unsubscription etc information in mailing lists... your mail client should be able to show you this by checking Show All Headers or some similar menu option). From: Denis Mazin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe List-Id: support.freenetproject.org List-Unsubscribe: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support, ^^^ Gee, I wonder what this URL does! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe ^ This is fairly straightforward too - send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe. List-Archive: http://hawk.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/ The easiest way for me to unsubscribe you from the list would be to spoof your email address and send in the unsubscribe myself; I don't do this because it would be against my ISP's terms of service :). The second easiest involves getting perms to admin the list, which I don't care about at the moment. Do it yourself. -- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/1/03 http://freenetproject.org/ msg02430/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
please i need help closing this program could you guide me thru this thank you Simple. In the top-right corner of Incredimail, click the X button. Alternatively go to Add/Remove Programs and uninstall Incredimail. d ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
please i need help closing this program could you guide me thru this thank you Enclosure: untitled (Type: HTML File) Enclosure: sg-0.gif (Type: GIF Image) Enclosure: IMSTP.gif (Type: GIF Image) Enclosure: 6.gif (Type: GIF Image) what the fuck! (sorry)
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
On Saturday 05 October 2002 15:05, you wrote: J'ai installé freenet. qd je sélectionne Open Gateway, une page ie s'ouvre www.127.0.0.1: avec impossible de trouver la page. Comment ça marche votre truc ? (je ne parle français) ouvre: http://127.0.0.1:/ ou: http://localhost:/ avec votre browser. mfg The Bishop ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
may -- ...and then may said... % % i have a free webpage through my isp but they say i need to buy microsoft front page or a nother front page i dont want to pay for my free web page were can i go i would be grateful for your help 1) This isn't that kind of freenet; sorry. 2) Can't you just use ftp to publish your web pages? Whip out a copy of mozilla, write your page in its composer, and hit publish and follow the prompts. 3) You should probably find another ISP; after all, *you* are the customer and *they* work for you! HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg00930/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
I have detailed instructions on how to download Suns JVM here:- http://club.cycom.co.uk/detailedInstallationInstructions.html You can stop following the instruction after the JVM step unless you would also like to try Java Web Start and my software! -- Christopher William Turner, http://www.cycom.co.uk/ Java development since 1996 http://club.cycom.co.uk/tms.htm Terminology Management software http://club.cycom.co.uk/wt.htm Wind Turbine blade design software ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Ana, Before you install Freenet, you do need the Java runtime environment. There are several options, but the package that I recommend you download is the Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SE). Like Chris said, you can download that from http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/download.html. What you'll want is the J2SE v 1.4.0_01. Note that it is the STANDARD EDITION. On the page it gives you several options. Basically, you can choose which platform you want and the version of the product you want. You'll want the Windows version, and you can choose between U.S. English only or all languages. You can also choose between the JRE (Java Runtime Environment) or SDK (Software Development Kit). The only thing you need to run Freenet is the JRE. It is a smaller download than the SDK, but the SDK gives you some extra functionality, like the Java compiler, which allows you to compile your own source code. It doesn't matter which one you download. After you've installed the JRE or SDK, you can then download the Automatic Windows Installer from http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/Download. You should not receive an error when you try to download this. Try it again. If you still can't get it to work, I can email you a copy of the file, but you should be able to download it straight from the site. The recent updates are snapshot updates geared towards improving the performance of Freenet. In particular, the file that gets updated with every new build is freenet.jar. The Automatic Windows Installer will automatically download the latest snapshot of freenet.jar during the installation process. Please note that you need to be connected to the internet while you install Freenet. Also, after installation, you can update your snapshot of Freenet without reinstalling the whole program. This will allow you to retain all your settings files. In answer to your question, you do need to install Sun's JRE or SDK before installing Freenet, despite the recent updates. Good luck with installing Freenet and your upgrade to Windows XP Pro! Wesley. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 01 July, 2002 01:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, My aim is to download the Freenet software. My computer details : Desk top - Intel Pentium 111 733 SDRAM 128 MB PC-150 Windows 98 SE - - planning to upgrade to XP pro in next 24hrs I have 3 basic questions. 1 - -acessed the Sun.com site to download Sun's 1.4 JVM It's not particularly staight forward JVM appears to be a CVM or vis versa! The download that seems to be the closest to what you recommend is Java[tm] 2 Platform, Micro Edition Connected Device Configuration/Foundation Profile Version 1.0.1 Linux/x86 This is for Linux? or Product Description Platform(s) Delivery Format Java HotSpot Virtual Machine 2.0 Solaris/SPARC Solaris/Intel Linux Windows/NT Electronic Download Begin Download Java HotSpot Virtual Machine 1.0.1 Solaris/SPARC Solaris/Intel Windows/NT If I do a site search for Sun's 1.4 JVM ... the page is not available comes up. I have to confess I'm CONFUSED! 2 Meanwhile back on your site page- http://freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/Download under Downloads and - Windows and where it says to download the automatic installer and run it if I click this on, I get a page that says You are not authorized to view this page 3 Aparently freenet has been updated as of 28th June. Does it still require us to download The Sun Java software? I would appreciate some assistance to help sort this out. Thank you, Ana -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Hush 2.1 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com wl8EARECAB8FAj0f9QsYHGF1dG8yMDc0NDRAaHVzaG1haWwuY29tAAoJEFwf+75HF6Lm 5ZQAoJVkokcFDxIQu/U9nMg7JXDu/jzPAKCyAlk9lYyVfivP6ETXvuQqxpk/OA== =gTB4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Communicate in total privacy. Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Looking for a good deal on a domain name? http://www.hush.com/partners/offers.cgi?id=domainpeople ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support ___ support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
MH == Mike Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MH find something that works then advertise stupid!!! Hey, Mike. Sorry things didn't work out so great for you. What happened? Did you have a particular problem, or was it generally just a total mess? What operating system are you using, by the way? ~Mr. Bad -- ~~ Mr. Bad - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.shithousecrazy.com/ * s t a y * * r e a l * * b a d * ~~ ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Yes. Don't forget to download and install the Java Runtimes. That's what it asked you to do. Freenet is written in Java, and needs Java Runtimes installed before it will work. Therefore, to make it work, do as it suggested. I assume you are running on Windows. So try this link for starters: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/download-windows.html Dave - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:32 AM Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) The download will not work. The computer says I have to locate Java Runtimes. I tried to update like it says and it still will not work. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
Try re-downloading it and reinstalling it. This is a very surprising error indeed, since freenet.exe is the main executable file so I can't understand why it can't find it. One possibility is that you have installed freenet.exe onto a network-mapped drive and that the shortcut in your StartUp folder is trying to access this drive before the mapping has completed. Another alternative is that you have installed freenet.exe using a login which has access to a certain folder but then you are trying to run it as a user who DOESN'T have access to this folder. You don't say what operating system you are using. Or what version of freenet you are trying. In fact you don't say much at all so this reply is total conjecture. What path did you try installing freenet into? e.g. C:\Program Files\Freenet Dave - Original Message - From: muhammad To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 11:48 AM Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) when i am installing freenet an error comes up freenet.exe not found what should i do ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)
(1) Java cannot installed in a path with spaces. (2) If the above is not the problem, try to turn off Zone Alarm temporaraly. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of GerrySent: Saturday, June 02, 2001 11:07 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) please see attached form
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
hmm, the way I understand your question is, that you want to access websites which are blocked by the proxy you're using. Freenet doesn't provide access to websites, unless a website is inserted(copied) in freenet you can't get it via freenet. Besides, it might be difficult to get a freenet node running, since you seem to be behind a proxy/firewall. If you want access to freenet I'm shure someone(me too) could open fproxy for you, just ask. This would give you a chance to mess with freenet. BTW: anyone knows of public fproxy's? This would make sense for people that can't run their own node. I think you're looking for tools like HTTPTunnel: httptunnel creates a bidirectional virtual data connection tunnelled in HTTP requests. The HTTP requests can be sent via an HTTP proxy if so desired. www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html Multiproxy: Unique personal proxy server, helps protect your privacy on Internet and can speed up your downloads... www.multiproxy.org/downloads.htm After all, I'm interested to know what type of websites get blocked by the communist party? hope this helps you, Stephan On Thu, 31 May 2001 02:03:27 right ma wrote: Would you tell me how to use your freenet to open the sites wich locked my the communist party? thanks _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
At 09.47 31/05/01 +0200, you wrote: hmm, the way I understand your question is, that you want to access websites which are blocked by the proxy you're using. Freenet doesn't provide access to websites, unless a website is inserted(copied) in freenet you can't get it via freenet. Besides, it might be difficult to get a freenet node running, since you seem to be behind a proxy/firewall. If you want access to freenet I'm shure someone(me too) could open fproxy for you, just ask. This would give you a chance to mess with freenet. A public Freenet gateway is http://freenet.firenze.linux.it:8081/ HTH. Marco /\ \ /ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN X AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ * Mac (Marco A. Calamari) [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marcoc.it * * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * * DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B * * PGP keys: request keyserver http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371 * ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
RE: [freenet-support] (no subject)
After all, I'm interested to know what type of websites get blocked by the communist party? freenet.sourceforge.net, freenetproject.org, freenet-china.org Voice of America (www.voa.gov), BBC (www.bbc.com), Radio Free Asia (www.rfa.org), Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, LA Times, etc Falun Gong (falundafa.org, faluninfo.net, minghui.org ) And many many other news, political, human rights, or religious websites. China has completely blocked all newsgroups!!! At one time, Caltech hosted a small website for Falun Gong Club in Cultech on the same server that offers student services. The Chinese communists block the entire caltech webserver. So applicants in China were not able to complete the application until the matter was settled through high deplomatic channels. And of course, the Club website was moved out of the Cultech server. How? They have a national firewall that filters email and http packets. If they discover certain key words (like freenet) used they will examine where they are from, and automatically block the source, and in many cases, persecute the requester. In many Internet bars, they have software to discover that if you trying to visit any banned website (even through proxy), and set off a sound alarm. The software is generally called Internet-110, where 110 is the phone number for police there. The son of the Chinese President directly oversees the Internet-110 project. There are also a lot of government supported professional hackers to hack the above sites. So I knew sooner or later freenetproject.org will be hacked. See articles (from search of great firewall of China) China: The Great Firewall http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,16545,00.html http://www.slashdot.org/yro/00/03/11/1223240.shtml The Great Firewall of China (many different versions) http://polywog.navpoint.com/sociology/devnat/firewall_of_china/ http://www.e-businessworld.com/english/crd_internet_85253.html It is a hell there. And we need your help! Sincerely, Yuan ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
begin xjh quotation of Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:06:36AM +0800: How can I config the port number in freenet! Edit freenetrc and change the listenPort line. Example: listenPort=31337 -- Don Marti I've never sent or received a GIF in my life. [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- Bruce Schneier, Secrets and Lies, p. 246. http://zgp.org/~dmarti/(Free the Web: http://burnallgifs.org/) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] (no subject)
hi first of all you should try to connect http://localhost:8081 or http://127.0.0.1:8081/ better than just http://localhost tell us David - Original Message - From: Sylvain BORELLE To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:18 PM Subject: [freenet-support] (no subject) Hi I've installed Freenet, but it doesn't work at all. I've downloaded and tested the last version (release 0.3.8.1), and I tried it under windows 98SE. My computer is a PC with an intel celeron 433, 128Mo. When launching the software, an internet explorer page opens and try to connect to http://localhost:/ , which can't be found. Nothing happens then. I'm stuck here. Could you help me please to find out from the the problem is coming? Thanx ===Sylvain BORELLE[EMAIL PROTECTED]===
