Re: [freenet-support] Running freenet
On Saturday 16 Apr 2011 22:55:34 Juiceman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:32 PM, M & L Vine wrote: > > I have just downloaded the installer, but can't get it to work. > > > > I have windows XP Home edition. > > > > Are ther any program conflicts say with apple software etc.. > > > > There was (still is?) an issue with Kaspersky antivirus, not sure > about any others. Post your log files and we'll try to help you > figure it out. Agreed, we need more information: What exactly happened? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Running freenet
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:32 PM, M & L Vine wrote: > I have just downloaded the installer, but can't get it to work. > > I have windows XP Home edition. > > Are ther any program conflicts say with apple software etc.. > There was (still is?) an issue with Kaspersky antivirus, not sure about any others. Post your log files and we'll try to help you figure it out. ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Running freenet without run.sh or a wrapper
On Friday 20 August 2010 00:11:59 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:08:57 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > > Until recently, I was able to start freenet directly with a cool "java > > blablaoptions freenet.node.Nodestarter". Not so with the latest bunch > > of freenet releases :S. Is there a nice and easy way to get it run > > simply, without all these wrappers (nonsense :b)? > > Oh, here is wrapper.log -- it seems to hang at (or just after) > "executor": > > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: Initializing... > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: WARNING - The wrapper.native_library system > property was not > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: set. Using the default value, 'wrapper'. > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: WARNING - The version of the Wrapper which > launched this JVM is > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: "unknown" while the version of the native > library 18:55:34: WrapperManager: is "3.3.3". > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: The Wrapper may appear to work correctly but > some features may > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: not function correctly. This configuration > has not been tested > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: and is not supported. > 18:55:34: WrapperManager: > 18:55:34: Using default config filename freenet.ini > 18:55:34: Creating config from freenet.ini > 18:55:34: Creating logger... > 18:55:34: Starting executor... > > The next step, when using run.sh, should be: > > "Attempting to load the NativeThread library [NativeThread]" Is this fixed? No idea what's going on, a thread dump might be informative... I think TheSeeker does the same thing... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Running freenet without run.sh or a wrapper
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:08:57 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: > Until recently, I was able to start freenet directly with a cool "java > blablaoptions freenet.node.Nodestarter". Not so with the latest bunch > of freenet releases :S. Is there a nice and easy way to get it run > simply, without all these wrappers (nonsense :b)? Oh, here is wrapper.log -- it seems to hang at (or just after) "executor": 18:55:34: WrapperManager: Initializing... 18:55:34: WrapperManager: WARNING - The wrapper.native_library system property was not 18:55:34: WrapperManager: set. Using the default value, 'wrapper'. 18:55:34: WrapperManager: WARNING - The version of the Wrapper which launched this JVM is 18:55:34: WrapperManager: "unknown" while the version of the native library 18:55:34: WrapperManager: is "3.3.3". 18:55:34: WrapperManager: The Wrapper may appear to work correctly but some features may 18:55:34: WrapperManager: not function correctly. This configuration has not been tested 18:55:34: WrapperManager: and is not supported. 18:55:34: WrapperManager: 18:55:34: Using default config filename freenet.ini 18:55:34: Creating config from freenet.ini 18:55:34: Creating logger... 18:55:34: Starting executor... The next step, when using run.sh, should be: "Attempting to load the NativeThread library [NativeThread]" ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Running Freenet
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Corrado Cecere wrote: > > Hi, > > So I have installed, browsed a while etc. > > Then closed the browser, and now I can't get back on it, I mean I have no > clear icon anywhere, if I go in to the list of applications (running mac), > there is only a folder and once I open that ,lots of sub-folders? > > How do I run it after the first time? > Even if you can't find an icon you can always point your web browser to http://127.0.0.1: -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Running Freenet On Dedicated Machine
On Thursday 18 March 2010 17:41:09 [Anon] Anon User > wrote: > -BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE- > Message-type: plaintext > > I've been away from Freenet 0.7 for quite a while and have decided > to give it another try. The thing is though that I would like to > have it run on a dedicated machine within my LAN and have browser > access and apps such as Frost, Fuqid, Jsite and so on running from > a separate machine. I also need to prevent access to administrative > functions (such as shutdown) on the machine it's running on, instead > having those functions only accessible from that separate > computer. > > How much of a P.I.T.A. will this be to set up and is there a guide > to doing so? It is fairly easy. There is an FAQ item about it. Basically you need to set the bindTo, allowedHosts and allowedHostsFullAccess. > > -END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] running freenet on memory stick
robert fallis wrote: > I,ve just bought a 8gig memory stick, Can I run freenet on it so that it > doesn't interfear with my computor, I'm running ubuntu 8.4 > > bob > Do you want a separate (VMed) OS on the memory stick with freenet on it, or just freenet that starts and runs off the memory stick without accessing anything else? You can do both probably, but i can't help you with the former, the latter be done, but you will probably need to change the file system to something that keeps the file attributes on unix-like operating systems, just to make the job easier. You will not want the installer to be messing with your system, you will want to cd to wherever you want to put the freenet on the USB stick and run the following: wget http://downloads.freenetproject.org/alpha/installer/freenet07.tar.gz cat freenet07.tar.gz | gzip -d | tar xv cd freenet ./run.sh start After that you might want to go to the config page of the node and change: "Directories downloading is allowed to" setting if you really do not want the node to touch *anything* outside of usb stick. Change it to wherever the usb stick is mounted to and the subdirectories on it. - Volodya -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Echo of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://eng.anarchopedia.org/ Anarchopedia, A Free Knowledge Portal http://freenetproject.org/ The Free Network project "None of us are free until all of us are free."~ Mihail Bakunin ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] running freenet on memory stick
Your question is more an ubuntu question :-) Try to google for: "can you install ubuntu 8.04 on a 8 gb usb stick" without the " You can also try the mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users or the archive: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users/ I expect that using a usb stick will make everything more slow? +++ On Monday 25 August 2008 10.06.21 bqz69 wrote: > See www.minihowto.org - here you can see how to install ubuntu 8.04 > encrypted, and also how to make a backup using dd, so even your backup is > encrypted. > > Then you can run freenet from there - it works well - and the speed is ok. > > Just a comment :-) > +++ > > On Monday 25 August 2008 09.38.42 robert fallis wrote: > > I,ve just bought a 8gig memory stick, Can I run freenet on it so that it > > doesn't interfear with my computor, I'm running ubuntu 8.4 > > > > bob > > ___ > Support mailing list > [email protected] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] running freenet on memory stick
See www.minihowto.org - here you can see how to install ubuntu 8.04 encrypted, and also how to make a backup using dd, so even your backup is encrypted. Then you can run freenet from there - it works well - and the speed is ok. Just a comment :-) +++ On Monday 25 August 2008 09.38.42 robert fallis wrote: > I,ve just bought a 8gig memory stick, Can I run freenet on it so that it > doesn't interfear with my computor, I'm running ubuntu 8.4 > > bob ___ Support mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Running Freenet as a Windows Service???
> Uh, fox... henhouse... How does this analogy hold up? > Did something get lost in the translation. Our foxes like fresh meat better than vegetables. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Running Freenet as a Windows Service???
On 9 Feb 2004 at 18:52, Your Name wrote: > > > 2 - I'm using the Internet Connection Firewall bundled with > > > WinXP do I need to configure it to work with Freenet? > > > > No, you need to disable it and install a software firewall that can > > be trusted, such as the one available for free from > > www.zonelabs.com. > > Making the XP firewall work with things like ICQ doesn't always even > > work, for reasons numerous and mysterious, nevermind something like > > Freenet. Besides, the XP firewall can't catch spyware and Trojans > > and self-mailing worms trying to call out without your > > authorization, and anyway, using it to protect your machine is like > > using a fox to guard a henhouse. > > Uh, fox... henhouse... How does this analogy hold up? Well, there's lots of nasty and unpleasant types out there who don't exactly wish your computer the best of health. M$ is one of the bigger ones, especially if you run XP, which can be deactivated remotely by M$ as well as self-deactivate if too much hardware changes at once, or so I've heard. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Running Freenet as a Windows Service???
> 1 - I'm using WinXP Home. w/ seperate accounts for family > members. How do I set up Freenet to run at System Start Up and > continue running no matter who is logged on or off, even when no > one is logged on (welcome screen)? I believe what you want is called Service Controller. It's a command line tool (in Windows!), so open up a command line box ( Start | Run | "cmd" ). To create a new service: \sc.exe create "Service Name" binPath= "C:\Your Program.exe" And then the service can be configgered in Administrative Tools ( Start | Control Panel | Administrative Tools | Services ). -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Running Freenet as a Windows Service???
> On 9 Feb 2004 at 15:47, Scott Wright wrote: > > > 2 - I'm using the Internet Connection Firewall bundled with > > WinXP do I need to configure it to work with Freenet? > > No, you need to disable it and install a software firewall that can > be trusted, such as the one available for free from > www.zonelabs.com. > Making the XP firewall work with things like ICQ doesn't always even > work, for reasons numerous and mysterious, nevermind something like > Freenet. Besides, the XP firewall can't catch spyware and Trojans > and self-mailing worms trying to call out without your > authorization, and anyway, using it to protect your machine is like > using a fox to guard a henhouse. Uh, fox... henhouse... How does this analogy hold up? Anyway, I agree. ZoneAlarm is free and is excellent. Whatever reason you have the Internet Connection Firewall enabled in Windows, ZoneAlarm will take care of it. The difference is, ZoneAlarm will do more, and will do it better. Internet Connection Firewall just limits incoming connections to those that are in response to an outgoing connection you've already made. Anything outgoing has a free pass. If you want to run Freenet, you can't run the Windows XP Internet Connection Firewall. -todd ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Running Freenet as a Windows Service???
On 9 Feb 2004 at 15:47, Scott Wright wrote: > 2 - I'm using the Internet Connection Firewall bundled with WinXP > do I need to configure it to work with Freenet? No, you need to disable it and install a software firewall that can be trusted, such as the one available for free from www.zonelabs.com. Making the XP firewall work with things like ICQ doesn't always even work, for reasons numerous and mysterious, nevermind something like Freenet. Besides, the XP firewall can't catch spyware and Trojans and self-mailing worms trying to call out without your authorization, and anyway, using it to protect your machine is like using a fox to guard a henhouse. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
