Re: [freenet-support] Which java VM, how to make it secure...

2005-10-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
1.5 is probably faster, not necessarily more secure... On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 08:28:43PM +0200, Level 13 wrote: I've recently upgraded to the latest version of Freenet (5105). The Java VM I'm using is 1.4.2_07-b05. Should there be any improvement if I upgraded it to a newer version?

Re: [freenet-support] Which Java?

2002-10-23 Thread Jay Oliveri
On Friday 18 October 2002 18:29 pm, Ian Clarke wrote: To my knowledge, there is no firm evidence that Sun's 1.4 JVM is causing any problems. I think the current problem is with the way start-freenet.sh starts the node under jdk 1.4.x. If I run 'java freenet.node.Main' manually it starts

Re: [freenet-support] Which Java?

2002-10-18 Thread Ian Clarke
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:40:03AM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote: At least one developer says we should use anything but Sun 1.4.* and recommends kaffe. If you are referring to Matthew Toseland, you should know that he has never actually tried using Sun's 1.4 JRE ;-) Is there a Freenet policy

Re: [freenet-support] Which Java?

2002-10-18 Thread Greg Wooledge
Roger Hayter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Is a different Java recommended for different parts of Freenet? Does it just depend which Java the programmer of the most recent patch happened to use? It largely depends on your platform. On OpenBSD, for instance, the only JVMs from which I can