Re: [freenet-support] bug in run.sh

2013-01-31 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 28 Jan 2013 22:08:43 Ken T Takusagawa wrote: run.sh for Linux has if test $DIST_OS == macosx This should be a single = sign, not == to be POSIX compliant. (Bug discovered using Debian's default dash instead of bash as /bin/sh.) It might be best to post a pull

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'There is a missing line in the http:/...'

2010-04-03 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 19 November 2009 15:28:48 UserVoice wrote: jee...@gmail.com wrote: There is a missing line in the http://freenetproject.org/download.html [http://freenetproject.org/download.html] headless install description. After freenet07.tar.gz is unpacked, ./bin/1run.sh should be

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'Running * Freenet 0.7.5 Build #12...'

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 23 January 2010 06:29:22 UserVoice wrote: thorns...@yahoo.com wrote: Running * Freenet 0.7.5 Build #1239 build01239 * Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771 Win XP sp3 all patches installed Java - Sun version 6 update 16 build 1.6.0_16b01 In sun Virtual Box 3.08 OSE R53138

Re: [freenet-support] bug

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 29 December 2009 21:58:28 thibaud gaiguant wrote: Viewing Issue Simple Details [ Jump to Noteshttps://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2692#bugnotes ] [ View Advancedhttps://bugs.freenetproject.org/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=2692 ] [ Issue

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Tracker

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 07 March 2010 09:38:47 davide...@riseup.net wrote: Dear Davide, As you may know, we currently have a backlog of orders. I am told the most recent batch has already been filled. The next batch will be ready in March. However, please note that there is an average lead time

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Tracker

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 07 March 2010 09:31:39 davide...@riseup.net wrote: Failure to confirm receipt of packets by N. 1 peer, possibly caused by a 'bug' (defect) in the program, my freenet version is 0.7.5. I don't think Freenet reports this any more. Sorry for wasting your time (and for your email getting

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'A IOException occred'

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
Sorry it has taken so long to get back to you. Did you ever get Freenet working? There were some temporary problems with downloading around Christmas. They should be fixed now. Please let us know if you have any more problems. Thanks for trying Freenet! On Tuesday 08 December 2009 06:35:14

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'Freenet Starter ErrorFreenet Starte...'

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
You tried to install Freenet in November. Sorry we haven't been able to get back to you. Anyway, the bug may be fixed by the current installer; please try again and let us know whether it works. Thanks for trying Freenet! On Thursday 26 November 2009 22:35:11 UserVoice wrote:

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'Freenet Starter ErrorFreenet Starte...'

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Friday 27 November 2009 07:18:36 a...@amitm.com wrote: i tried four times under different conditions and NADA the same result over and over again Please try again - uninstall and get the new exe from the website. There is a reasonable chance that recent versions of the installer have fixed

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-27 Thread SmallSister development
Evan Daniel wrote: Persistent-temp is not part of the datastore, and is not expected to stay within the datastore size limit. It's used to hold data from partially completed downloads. In theory, it will only grow to be slightly larger than your total queue size. However, there appear to

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-27 Thread Evan Daniel
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 10:34 AM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: Evan Daniel wrote: Persistent-temp is not part of the datastore, and is not expected to stay within the datastore size limit.  It's used to hold data from partially completed downloads.  In theory, it will

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-25 Thread SmallSister development
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:03:25 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-25 Thread Evan Daniel
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 7:18 AM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:03:25 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page gives this error message too] I have posted about this bug as far back as June 12th '09, with freenet version

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread SmallSister development
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page gives this error message too] I have posted about this bug as far back as June 12th '09,

Re: [freenet-support] BUG: Freenet does not respect size limit for datastore

2009-12-24 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:03:25 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: Dennis Nezic wrote: On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:28:36 +0100, SmallSister development wrote: 2) Error message on the file sharing pages: Internal error Internal error Return to queue page. [The queue page gives this error

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'Freenet Download button is not func...'

2009-12-10 Thread Evan Daniel
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM, UserVoice supp...@uservoice.com wrote: manojmast...@aol.com wrote: Freenet Download button is not functioning. I am being redirected next page, displaying some code error. On http://freenetproject.org/index.html Using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'I can't download (0.7.5 for Windows).'

2009-12-10 Thread Evan Daniel
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:52 AM, UserVoice supp...@uservoice.com wrote: davide.min...@gmail.com wrote: I can't download (0.7.5 for Windows). On http://freenetproject.org/ Using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.33

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'cannot get freenet to work on mac G5 ...'

2009-12-04 Thread Dsoslglece
UserVoice a écrit : frankay...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: cannot get freenet to work on mac G5 and safari 4. just does not want to open after installation what am I doing wrong? On http://freenetproject.org/whatis.html Using Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en)

Re: [freenet-support] Bug: 'Freenet Starter ErrorFreenet Starte...'

2009-11-26 Thread a...@amitm.com
i tried four times under different conditions and NADA the same result over and over again UserVoice wrote: paladin_squ...@live.com wrote: Freenet Starter Error Freenet Starter was unable to control the Freenet System Service. Reason: Service did not respond to signal. If

Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-06-12 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 30 May 2009 22:14:32 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 10 May 2009 15:51:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 HTTP socket

Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-05-30 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 10 May 2009 15:51:39 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 HTTP socket handlers (86.7% of thread usage). (My node's thread limit is 300).

Re: [freenet-support] Bug report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets

2009-05-21 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 17 May 2009 21:30:28 Juiceman wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Saturday 02 May 2009 11:09:37 theymos wrote: Freenet asked me to report this bug to you. I'm on Freenet 0.7 Build #1209 rbuild01209-real, Freenet-ext Build

Re: [freenet-support] Bug report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets

2009-05-17 Thread Juiceman
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Saturday 02 May 2009 11:09:37 theymos wrote: Freenet asked me to report this bug to you. I'm on Freenet 0.7 Build #1209 rbuild01209-real, Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771. I just updated to 1209 a few hours ago.

Re: [freenet-support] Bug report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets

2009-05-15 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Saturday 02 May 2009 11:09:37 theymos wrote: Freenet asked me to report this bug to you. I'm on Freenet 0.7 Build #1209 rbuild01209-real, Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771. I just updated to 1209 a few hours ago. I updated using update.cmd because the built-in update wasn't working. Probably

Re: [freenet-support] Bug in HTTP socket handler in 1208?

2009-05-10 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:58:48 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote: I have seen a couple times my node stall due to exceeding the thread limit, caused by an absurd 333 HTTP socket handlers (86.7% of thread usage). (My node's thread limit is 300). I believe this is caused by my browser (dillo) making too

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-11 Thread Matthew Toseland
1192 will be mandatory tomorrow. Please wait until tomorrow, restart your node, and report whether it still happens. Thanks. On Wednesday 10 December 2008 20:49, Ancoron Luciferis wrote: Mel Charters wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1983121.TrFsbus4oi;

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-10 Thread Ancoron Luciferis
Mel Charters wrote: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1983121.TrFsbus4oi; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tuesday 09 December 2008 10:43, Volodya wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 07 December 2008

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-09 Thread Volodya
Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:57, Volodya wrote: Mel Charters wrote: Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 10:43, Volodya wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:57, Volodya wrote: Mel Charters wrote: Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-09 Thread Mel Charters
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nextPart1983121.TrFsbus4oi; protocol=application/pgp-signature; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tuesday 09 December 2008 10:43, Volodya wrote: Matthew Toseland wrote: On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:57, Volodya wrote: Mel

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:57, Volodya wrote: Mel Charters wrote: Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-07 Thread Volodya
Mel Charters wrote: Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-07 Thread Mel Charters
Mel Charters wrote: Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug

Re: [freenet-support] Bug report

2008-11-27 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 27 November 2008 17:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL

Re: [freenet-support] [Bug report?] NullPointerException in PacketSender

2008-10-27 Thread bqz69
On Monday 27 October 2008 23.49.18 Dan Stevens wrote: Freenet 0.7 Build #1165 r22843M Freenet-ext Build #22 r22506 After running seemingly just fine for several weeks, I suddenly ran out of disk space. The problem turned out to be my freenet log, which was expanding at about a megabyte per

Re: [freenet-support] Bug report : update scripts are empty

2006-05-02 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:33:57AM +0200, Julien Cornuwel wrote: Hi, I don't know if it's a known bug but this morning, when I tried to update my 0.7 node, I found that both update.sh and update2.sh were empty ! Could someone put them on downloads.freenetproject.org so I can retreive

Re: [freenet-support] Bug found in 5077

2004-04-28 Thread Fwolff33
In einer eMail vom Di, 27. Apr. 2004 15:44 MEZ schreibt Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Rama Jagerman wrote: Current upstream bandwidth usage  164677 bytes/second (164.7%) [...] average out to no more than the target. HOWEVER, there is a hard limit of 140% of

Re: [freenet-support] Bug found in 5077

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 01:57:41PM +0200, Rama Jagerman wrote: Hi, First of all, congratulations with the new stable version of Freenet. At this moment I am almost sure that there is a bug in Freenet, please see the next line, that I copied from Performance -- General Information:

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path*not handled

2004-03-18 Thread dave
Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too hard to fix, I'll crack one out tonight. I have changed the logFile option in the freenet.ini file to an other path. But when I click on View Logfile ... in the context menu of the blue freenet symbol, freenet.exe still shows me the

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path*not handled

2004-03-18 Thread dave
(fwiw it sounds like it isn't querying the ini file each time you click View Logfile - I think it's probably just querying once at startup) Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too hard to fix, I'll crack one out tonight. I have changed the logFile option in the

Re: [freenet-support] Bug Report - win32 - freenet.exe - logFile=*path*not handled

2004-03-18 Thread dave
Ur, or maybe I hardcoded freenet.log in the viewer and never fixed it... my bad. (fwiw it sounds like it isn't querying the ini file each time you click View Logfile - I think it's probably just querying once at startup) Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too hard to

Re: [freenet-support] bug in 6430

2004-01-08 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:10:36PM -0500, Edward J. Huff wrote: On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just do not know, where to report this, (probably it was noticed already anyway...), but the bandwith limiting in unstable version 6430 seems to be broken: Current

Re: [freenet-support] Bug or Feature?

2004-01-02 Thread Edward J. Huff
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 12:14, Rudolf Krist wrote: Hello, after I have upgraded my node to the Build 6415, the routing table only contained nodes with the Build Nr. = 6415. Is that a new feature? Or was it not intended? Yes, users of the unstable build are expected to upgrade daily. -- Ed

Re: [freenet-support] bug? Can't set storeSize in human-readable format

2002-10-31 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:16:02AM -0600, GeckoX wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I tried setting my storeSize in 0.5.0.3 to 2G and fred wouldn't start. Here's what I tried to do in freenet.conf: storeSize=2G This is only supported in the development/unstable branch

Re: [freenet-support] Bug...

2001-06-07 Thread Dave Hooper
Visit the sun site _again_ ... this time following all the links that point to the Java 2 Runtime Environment for Windows. You will end up here: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/download-windows.html Download it. - Original Message - From: Marcus Berns To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [freenet-support] bug report

2001-04-27 Thread James Rogers
I am about to try freenet. I am installing it on Win2000P. The install process has come to a point where I have to chose a Java interpreter. There are 5 lines displayed, but some directory names are you should be happy to learn, then, that the new (.3.9) installer doesn't behave that way.