RE: [freenet-support] datastore size

2004-08-14 Thread Paul Schauble
There should be a relationship between bandwidth and store size. At a guess,
it's exponential, doubling the bandwidth can support a store 4 times larger.

Estimating this relationship would be valuable to the people running nodes.

++PLS

-Original Message-
From: Derek Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] datastore size


* Replies will be sent through Spamex to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* For additional info click - http://www.spamex.com/i/?v=3880664

Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
each node?

My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them all
in a timely manner due to resource limits (probably bandwidth).

As the store grows larger, even more requests come in, causing the node
to service a shrinking proportion of the total number of requests
directed towards it, which has a negative impact on the network.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Martin Scheffler
 Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:40 PM
 To: Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [freenet-support] h

 Am Dienstag, 10. August 2004 21:41 schrieb Steve:
  Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?

 short answer: No!

 long answer: The store fills up when your node serves requests from
others
 and you (the user). If a requested key is already in the store, your
node
 just sends this and makes no request on his own for that. When the
store
 is full, the least recently used key(s) is/are purged to make room. A
 bigger store means more keys are available, so chances to find
requested
 keys in the store increase, this is _GOOD_ for the network.

 ( might only overflow your own hard disk if configured insane :-) )

 good byte
 berny [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [freenet-support] datastore size

2004-08-14 Thread Paul Derbyshire
On 14 Aug 2004 at 1:06, Paul Schauble wrote:

 There should be a relationship between bandwidth and store size. At a guess,
 it's exponential, doubling the bandwidth can support a store 4 times larger.

That's quadratic, not exponential. The store size would be scaling 
with the square of the bandwidth, not 2 to the power of something 
proportional to the bandwidth.

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] datastore size

2004-08-11 Thread Toad
Debatable point...

On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:13:08AM +0200, Martin Scheffler wrote:
 Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn:
  On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
   Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
 
  Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent
  specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves
  routing. If I were you I would let it specialise at one point.
 
 Sorry, but forget that. In Freenet there is no thing like a one peak 
 specialisation for more than one minute.
 And when the network can hold more data, it increases the lifetime of 
 seldom requested keys.
 Specialization changes over time, anyway.
 
 The only drawback may be that your ubernode becomes popular over time 
 because of more successful replies :-) (much connections increase request 
 ability aswell)
 
 Routing does not get better when your node has to purge old keys on new 
 requests - maybe they are requested just one minute later - more net 
 load :-(
 
 good byte



 ___
 Support mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] datastore size

2004-08-10 Thread Michael Kuijn
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
 Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent 
specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves routing. If 
I were you I would let it specialise at one point.

-- 
Michael A. Kuijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail 
/\- against microsoft attachments
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [freenet-support] datastore size

2004-08-10 Thread Derek Ferguson
Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
each node?

My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them all
in a timely manner due to resource limits (probably bandwidth). 

As the store grows larger, even more requests come in, causing the node
to service a shrinking proportion of the total number of requests
directed towards it, which has a negative impact on the network.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Martin Scheffler
 Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:40 PM
 To: Steve; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [freenet-support] h
 
 Am Dienstag, 10. August 2004 21:41 schrieb Steve:
  Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?
 
 short answer: No!
 
 long answer: The store fills up when your node serves requests from
others
 and you (the user). If a requested key is already in the store, your
node
 just sends this and makes no request on his own for that. When the
store
 is full, the least recently used key(s) is/are purged to make room. A
 bigger store means more keys are available, so chances to find
requested
 keys in the store increase, this is _GOOD_ for the network.
 
 ( might only overflow your own hard disk if configured insane :-) )
 
 good byte
 berny [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [freenet-support] datastore size

2004-08-10 Thread Martin Scheffler
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 00:55 schrieb Michael Kuijn:
 On Tuesday 10 August 2004 21:41, Steve wrote:
  Can it hurt the network if I make my datastore too big?

 Not really, but enlarging your datastore all the time will prevent
 specialisation. This isn't real bad, but specialisation improves
 routing. If I were you I would let it specialise at one point.

Sorry, but forget that. In Freenet there is no thing like a one peak 
specialisation for more than one minute.
And when the network can hold more data, it increases the lifetime of 
seldom requested keys.
Specialization changes over time, anyway.

The only drawback may be that your ubernode becomes popular over time 
because of more successful replies :-) (much connections increase request 
ability aswell)

Routing does not get better when your node has to purge old keys on new 
requests - maybe they are requested just one minute later - more net 
load :-(

good byte


pgpty6uif4ja1.pgp
Description: signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] datastore size

2004-08-10 Thread Martin Scheffler
Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 01:06 schrieb Derek Ferguson:
 Hmmm. Am I wrong to think there probably is an optimal store size for
 each node?
Sorry, yes.

 My thinking is that as the store grows, the node draws more requests,
 which at some point will exceed the node's ability to service them all
 in a timely manner due to resource limits (probably bandwidth).

 As the store grows larger, even more requests come in, causing the node
 to service a shrinking proportion of the total number of requests
 directed towards it, which has a negative impact on the network.

The first is the request success rate (which makes your node attractive), 
another measure (request rate limiting) tells the other nodes to reduce 
the requests/time, to balance out all the peers with your avaiable 
bandwidth.

A big store is good (even for yourself).

good byte


pgp3utfkDm14e.pgp
Description: signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]