Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-09-01 Thread Eric Chadbourne
On 08/31/2010 11:36 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
 Yea, data persistence isn't that great at the moment. But you
 hosting all the data just isn't how Freenet works. (Someone correct
 me if I'm wrong.) Each node is intended to specialize around a tight
 keyspace -- I believe this is intrinsic to the routing algorithms.
 I'm not sure how your location (every node has one, which is
 directly related to the keys you're supposed to specialize in) would
 be handled if you hacked the code to promiscuously handle any key. My
 guess is it would make the topology of the network less efficient.

if this is true it is totally not what i expected.  very interesting!

 so, ahh, what does the persistence column exactly mean in freenet?
 
 Good question :b.

i grepped through the source but i couldn't figure it out.  looks like a
question for toad.

1.  it seems i need to verify whether or not persistence = forever is
keeping a local copy.  sounds like it might not be.

2.  if there is some tight key space voodoo going on then maybe whip up
a script to check periodically if file foo is available and if not reinsert.

am i thinking about this correctly?  many thanks for suggestions!

- eric c



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-09-01 Thread Eric Chadbourne
On 08/31/2010 11:36 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote:
...
 Yea, data persistence isn't that great at the moment. But you hosting
 all the data just isn't how Freenet works. (Someone correct me if I'm
 wrong.) Each node is intended to specialize around a tight keyspace --
 I believe this is intrinsic to the routing algorithms. I'm not sure how
 your location (every node has one, which is directly related to the
 keys you're supposed to specialize in) would be handled if you hacked
 the code to promiscuously handle any key. My guess is it would make the
 topology of the network less efficient.

if this is true it is totally not what i expected.  very interesting!

 so, ahh, what does the persistence column exactly mean in freenet?
 
 Good question :b.

i grepped through the source but i couldn't figure it out.  looks like a
question for toad.

1.  it seems i need to verify whether or not persistence = forever is
keeping a local copy.  sounds like it might not be.

2.  if there is some tight key space voodoo going on then maybe whip up
a script to check periodically if file foo is available and if not reinsert.

am i thinking about this correctly?  many thanks for suggestions!

- eric c



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-09-01 Thread Eric Chadbourne
 so, ahh, what does the persistence column exactly mean in freenet?

 Good question :b.

found the answer.

http://new-wiki.freenetproject.org/FCPv2#Persistence_and_the_Global_Queue

it has nothing to do with what i had assumed.  damn.

thanks for your help,
eric c



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:01:56 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote:
 hi all.
 
 when i upload a file, is that file on my local data store?
 
 what does the persistence column stand for in
 http://127.0.0.1:/uploads/ ?
 
 i would like to upload a very large amount of files and i would like
 to *always* have it in my data store.  is this possible with the
 current version of freenet or should i write some code to do this
 independently? i understand this may not be the wisest move from a
 security perspective but i'm in a relatively free country.
 
 thanks for any tips!

That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if
many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly,
and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for
redundancy (and security) from the beginning.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Eric Chadbourne
 That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if
 many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly,
 and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for
 redundancy (and security) from the beginning.

i hear what you're saying.  and i don't disagree for normal clients.
but, let's pretend, that i wanted to upload ~10TB of video.  now.  i
also want it to be quickly unavailable to others fall out of other folks
data stores too soon.  so some sort of extended persistence would be
wanted in the beginning.  what do you suggest?  i suspect the answer
nothing is currently available and i must roll my own...

so, ahh, what does the persistence column exactly mean in freenet?

thanks,
eric c



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote:
  That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if
  many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly,
  and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for
  redundancy (and security) from the beginning.
 
 i hear what you're saying.  and i don't disagree for normal clients.
 but, let's pretend, that i wanted to upload ~10TB of video.  now.  i
 also want it to be quickly unavailable to others fall out of other
 folks data stores too soon.  so some sort of extended persistence
 would be wanted in the beginning.  what do you suggest?  i suspect
 the answer nothing is currently available and i must roll my own...

Yea, data persistence isn't that great at the moment. But you hosting
all the data just isn't how Freenet works. (Someone correct me if I'm
wrong.) Each node is intended to specialize around a tight keyspace --
I believe this is intrinsic to the routing algorithms. I'm not sure how
your location (every node has one, which is directly related to the
keys you're supposed to specialize in) would be handled if you hacked
the code to promiscuously handle any key. My guess is it would make the
topology of the network less efficient.


 so, ahh, what does the persistence column exactly mean in freenet?

Good question :b.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] persistence question

2010-08-31 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:41:16 -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote:
  That would defeat the purpose of Freenet :b. Entirely. Imagine if
  many people started doing this -- the data wouldn't spread properly,
  and would fall off the network fast. We sacrificed latency for
  redundancy (and security) from the beginning.
 
 i hear what you're saying.  and i don't disagree for normal clients.
 but, let's pretend, that i wanted to upload ~10TB of video.  now.  i
 also want it to be quickly unavailable to others fall out of other
 folks data stores too soon.  so some sort of extended persistence
 would be wanted in the beginning.  what do you suggest?

I'd suggest uploading it twice, or more :\. Or making sure people are
interested in it, to ensure it will propagate well.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe