Hello,
I'm setting up pfSense as a deparmental firewall within my network in
order to seperate a specific LAN from the rest of the world. In order to
access the Internet by means of HTTP or FTP protocols I must refer my
browser to a proxy server. When I try to download any packages (CVS) the
Do you mean the pfSense itself has to go to the internet through a
proxy? This is not supported and there are no settings for it. The
package manager tries to access the package repository at pfsense.com
and is not able to utilize a proxy for that. Maybe you can setup rules
at the proxy to allow
On 1/4/07, Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean the pfSense itself has to go to the internet through a
proxy? This is not supported and there are no settings for it. The
package manager tries to access the package repository at pfsense.com
and is not able to utilize a proxy for
On 1/4/07, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, not entirely true :) If you feel like editing code, this is
a simple change.
/etc/inc/xmlrpc_client.inc around line 645 you should see:
/**
* The name of the proxy server to use, if any
* @var string
*/
var
On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:57 PM, nix4me wrote:
I have pfsense setup and i have a ftp server on 192.168.1.102. I
set up NAT inbound for the ftp port (2121) and also the passive
ports (4-40100) to go to 192.168.1.102. I let the firewall
rules autogenerate.
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:57 PM, nix4me wrote:
I have pfsense setup and i have a ftp server on 192.168.1.102. I set
up NAT inbound for the ftp port (2121) and also the passive ports
(4-40100) to go to 192.168.1.102. I let the firewall rules
autogenerate.
Hi,
Is the modified globals.inc file kept anywhere that can be downloaded? I tried
modifying the xmlrpc_client.inc file myself but keep getting an error when I
attempt to access the packages. A complete example would be appreciated. This
is the message in the system log :
php: /pkg_mgr.php:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/chngview?cn=16046
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 4:47 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Next proxy for pfSense firewall
Hi,
Is the modified globals.inc
And how can you expect help if you don't give any information to work
from!!!
As extremely brilliant as the developers are... they cannot read your
mind (or your problems, which seem abundant)
If you want help... be willing to work a bit, or be gone!
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: SDamron
Hi,
The list of available packages gets displayed just fine, but the installation
procedure produces a regular error on all of the packages I've tried to
installed.
This is what kind of appear on screen :
Downloading package configuration file... done.
Saving updated package information...
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The list of available packages gets displayed just fine, but the installation
procedure produces a regular error on all of the packages I've tried to
installed.
This is what kind of appear on screen :
Downloading package configuration
is possible to add support to dnspark.net?
https://www.dnspark.net/api/dynamic/update.php?hostname=$HOSTip=$IP
it's similar to other services.
Or to add an Custom option where the parameters can be loaded direcltly for
any service.
PD: Sorry for my english
I'm not seeing that on my test install. You might make sure that the
changes you made to xmlrpc_client.inc have been reverted.
--Bill
On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Another side effect that I've been seeing is the following after applying any
changes in the
http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?action=artikelcat=10id=41artlang=en;
highlight=webgui%20wan
If your WAN is in a private range you als oneed to disable the block
private subnets at interfaceswan.
Holger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The HEAD version (Developementversion of pfSense 2.0) already has a
custom option to do so. You'll just have to wait for this version to
come out (release when it's done, don't ask). ;-)
Holger
-Original Message-
From: pablo hide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 04,
Timo Boettcher wrote:
* nix4me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a WRAP board (266mhz 128mb ram). I've read where pfsense takes
up more resources than the 1.22 version of m0n0wall but I don't see
any talk of how much more.
Will pfsense run ok on my WRAP for my home 10mbit/1mbit cable
16 matches
Mail list logo