I still want to suggest a setup that I will soon have in operation, I have
written about it before.
It uses 10 channels, it is a hexagon in the horizontal plane with a speakers at
front back.
The Z is handled by for speakers, placed where the 4 hexagon side speakers will
end up if the
On 05/03/2011 08:03 AM, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Similarly, what does a SoundField mic output? A/B format. Now
translate that into 5.1. That's what's a realistic production flow.
and it does not work very well. nobody who is producing 5.1 the usual
way (i.e. without using a soundfield) will
Quick suggestion: - as you're having to use more than 8 channels anyway, you're
likely to be using a 16 channel card; thus, you would have some channels left
to decode (horizontal only) to 3 or 4 subs
Dr Peter Lennox
School of Technology
University of Derby, UK
tel: 01332 593155
e:
On 03/05/2011 09:18, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
..
but if you want to bring ambisonics into the industry, it's either HOA
or go into a quiet corner to die. the argument that any talk of HOA will
be detrimental to ambisonics uptake is sentimental BS. HOA is no black
magic, and six speakers aren't
Yes, I have a few woofers available BUT according to what I understand
from psychoacoustics we cannot really hear directions of sound below 80 Hz,
as the ear/brain is changing method of decoding soundwaves between 80 to 100 Hz?
So do I really need more than a pair driven in mono (or 4) to even
From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_localization#Evaluation_for_low_frequencies
Evaluation for low frequencies
For frequencies below 800 Hz, the dimensions of the head (ear distance 21.5 cm,
corresponding to an interaural time delay of 625 µs), are smaller than the half
wavelength of the
from psychoacoustics we cannot really hear directions of sound below 80 Hz
I know that it is frequently written, but it's not true. Of the two
localization
mechanisms active at low frequencies, Interaural Time Differences (ITDs) are
the
ones that give useable localization cues in free space.
