On 14 Apr 2012, at 04:46, JEFF SILBERMAN ambis...@pacbell.net wrote:
The solution lies in getting the home/spec builder industry to integrate
in-wall loudspeakers at pre-specified locations (including ceiling) in the
21st century media room which room will become the new normal much like
On 14/04/2012 04:27, JEFF SILBERMAN wrote:
..
soundstage envelopment and spaciousness)! Indeed, I would never
replace my 3 front loudspeakers with a quadrilateral layout. Why
three-speaker stereophony never became an end in itself is a mystery
to me. It is not nearly as financially and
I still claim that 3 loudspeakers would have been an easier sell than 5.1! If
I am not mistaken, I do believe there were a handful of 3-channel symphonic
DVD's recorded with the 3 omni mic technique. In my experience, most 5.1 users
correctly position the L/C/R loudspeakers, more or less. The
Paul Hodges wrote:
--On 13 April 2012 03:08 +0100 Stefan Schreiber
st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
I am not sure that any form of surround will make it into the home,
I have quite a lot of commercial surround music recordings, on 5.1
media. However, because of my recording activities, my
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
UHJ is simple and convenient, because people can buy it as a regular stereo
track like the rest of the music. No pop-up with a choice: stereo or surround
version, no playlists where one has to make sure the stereo version ends up on
the iPod, and the surround
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
So who cares about bandwidth and storage? But even if these other issues were
moot, bandwidth and storage remain at a premium, because my iPad holds only
64GB, and the iPhone's music download over 3G or 4G has a rather hefty price
tag.
Yes, but your next iPad
Robert Greene wrote:
I was not objecting to high order for production.
But it is never going to fly in playback terms.
Everyone takes for granted (I assume) that
people can and often do things to make recordings
that do not happen at the playback end.
(How many consumers know Protools?)
That
Hi,
Generally I totally agree with Ronald C.F. Antony and Robert Greene.
Ambisonics is useful and pleasing, even at first order. Until that
gets out of the starting blocks into more widespread use it will
remain a minority pursuit. I think all on this list would agree that
this is
Ronald C.F. Antony r...@cubiculum.com wrote:
On 12 Apr 2012, at 19:57, Martin Leese martin.le...@stanfordalumni.org
wrote:
...
The UK Government, through the
National Research Development Corporation,
strongly supported the development of
Ambisonics; they paid for it. While the NRDC
had
On 14 Apr 2012, at 16:47, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
UHJ is simple and convenient, because people can buy it as a regular stereo
track like the rest of the music. No pop-up with a choice: stereo or
surround version, no playlists where one has
can a tetrahedral mic be used to create a room (correction) impulse response
in B format? and how?
Yes.
I can make a sensible attempt today for an Ambi rig spaced away from the walls
as the HiFi pundits and other gurus have mandated for years. This however has
near zero Wife Acceptance
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120414/96175921/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
On 15 Apr 2012, at 02:14, JEFF SILBERMAN ambis...@pacbell.net wrote:
Are things really that bad? I need to get out more often! I'm thinking that
the 99% own flatscreens by now. If a homebuilder is going to place an
electrical outlet on the wall suitable for mounting a flatscreen, he might
13 matches
Mail list logo
