[Sursound] any idea's on the background of the stereo equations in the WW1977 article?

-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120720/47cd95a9/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] any idea's on the background of the stereo equations in the WW1977 article?

-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120720/47cd95a9/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] any idea's on the background of the stereo equations in the WW1977 article?

Johan Haspeslagh johan.haspesl...@pandora.be wrote: Hello, I have a question concerning the conversion of a stereo recording to ambisonics. In the Wireless World of 1977 articles there are equations for the conversion of stereo to W,X,Y equivalent signals. The use of j*Diff term doesn't

Re: [Sursound] any idea's on the background of the stereo equations in the WW1977 article?

part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20120720/47cd95a9/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Sursound] any idea's on the background of the stereo equations in the WW1977 article?

Johan Haspeslagh wrote: In the Wireless World of 1977 articles there are equations for the ... where Sum=L+R and Diff=L-R. I know nothing about the mathematics, and possiby this has nothing to do with your problem, but I want to make a note about the decoder construction, as I did build the