my understanding (which Im the first to admit is limited) was that the W
gave the position on the xyz axis - ie if the x,y, or z was in or out of
phase with the w it would give you info on which side of the fig of 8 the
signal was coming from and thus location on that axis. The way I built my
enco
--On 29 September 2012 23:08 +0100 Augustine Leudar
wrote:
so how
would it occur that Richard would have activity registering on his x,y,
and z meters but not the w one ?
Because there was no significant pressure signal, only a velocity one. He
did say this was an extreme situation (distan
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:10:11PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 09/29/2012 01:06 AM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
> >that is . weird. Im sure someone will have to remind me - memories of
> >constructing my ambisonic microphone and encoder are already fading but
> >isnt the omni W the sum o
On 09/29/2012 01:06 AM, Augustine Leudar wrote:
that is . weird. Im sure someone will have to remind me - memories of
constructing my ambisonic microphone and encoder are already fading but
isnt the omni W the sum of the XY and Z +/- (each with a reduced gain) ?
no.
in the case of a tetra
