> I think no serious person in audio wants anything to do
> with lossy compression which is a commercial compromise
> for no real reason(uncompressed audio no longer
> looks like that big a file). Since probably
> no one is interested in exotic surround items
> except people who are serious about a
I think no serious person in audio wants anything to do
with lossy compression which is a commercial compromise
for no real reason(uncompressed audio no longer
looks like that big a file). Since probably
no one is interested in exotic surround items
except people who are serious about audio,
I th
Richard Lee wrote:
As I've said ad nauseum, the guy who first integrates an Ambi decoder into VLC,
getting around the evil Windoz mixer etc. gets to choose the data structure for
next important Ambi format.
This will be a lossy compressed format probably based on the public domain
Vorbis.
On 28/10/2012 23:12, etienne deleflie wrote:
Hi Richard,
..
The 4GB limit has been considered within UA.
The wavpack format itself has the limit of 2^32 samples, which
translates to 27 hours at 44 kHz (or 1 hour of 27 channels at 44kHz).
The users who have been emailing me are all working at
Hi Richard,
> Yes, what it does, it does very well. However, as described, you are asked
> to first create an n-channel interleaved WAVE file containing all those
> uncompressed silent channels, and pass that to wavpack. Which is fine in
> principle, except that with a possibly large number of cha
On 27/10/2012 23:27, etienne deleflie wrote:
..
I really didn't want to get pulled into a defence or argument about
ambisonic formats ... but, just to clarify ... the choice to include
some empty channels in UA is intentionally designed so that authoring
environments don't need to change all the
