Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

2013-01-11 Thread Dave Hunt
Hi, Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:14:20 + From: Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk ... beyond 3D sound - my goodness! Just how many dimensions? - this is going to upset the theoretical physicists. Not those dealing with string theory, which apparently requires eleven dimensions. But, how

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

2013-01-11 Thread Peter Lennox
Yeah, but I'm thinking that some of those dimensions are too small to have sound in them. BTW - was that sealing wax, or ceiling wax? Dr. Peter Lennox School of Technology, Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology University of Derby, UK e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk t: 01332 593155 -Original

Re: [Sursound] A proposal for an Ambisonics based 3D audio codec, MPEG/ITU style...

2013-01-11 Thread Richard Furse
Very interesting post following discussion. I've actually been added very recently to the IST/37 committee, which apparently is a close relative to the MPEG one. However, I've not talked to any other members so far and I'm not sure how all this stuff works just yet! In other news, I spent a bit

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

2013-01-11 Thread Dave Hunt
Hi, Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:27:29 + From: Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk Yeah, but I'm thinking that some of those dimensions are too small to have sound in them. Possibly, though some astrophysicist has sonified the big bang and other events, claiming that they produce

Re: [Sursound] DTS Headphone:X

2013-01-11 Thread Dave Malham
On 11 January 2013 12:27, Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk wrote: Yeah, but I'm thinking that some of those dimensions are too small to have sound in them. BTW - was that sealing wax, or ceiling wax? Surely only if it's a full with-height system :-) Dave -- As of 1st October