and 3) When youtube
transcodes the video it adds an annoying click about once per second
(I believe this is due to a mismatch between the camera's framerate
and youtube's expectations. I would love to provide a theora/vorbis
screencapture video instead, but, alas, I cannot find any tools
Hi,
This looks good - can't try it at the moment as I am away from my
Linux machine but I do have a question - the user manual says The
spatialization control may be visualized as moving the sound source
across the surface of a hemispherical dome enclosing the listener but
this implies only
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Dave Malham dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
This looks good - can't try it at the moment as I am away from my
Linux machine but I do have a question - the user manual says The
spatialization control may be visualized as moving the sound source
across the
J. Liles wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Dave Malham dave.mal...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
This looks good - can't try it at the moment as I am away from my
Linux machine but I do have a question - the user manual says The
spatialization control may be visualized as moving the sound
Eric Carmichel wrote:
I am creating ways to *objectively* assess that the physical movement of air
(macro level, not micro) to demonstrate Ambisonics or HOA is suitable for
scientific research. As I recently wrote, it’s the PHYSICAL re-creation that
matters, not human perception. (Read or
there are other tools for that, Blender's new 3D sound objects
come to mind). The purpose of this work is to produce music.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130708/ed7f1867/attachment.html
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
I can appreciate both sides of the argument. However, one thing that I would
love to see:
a) sterile, measurement-like recording of as close to possible to what happened
recording
It is important to see that the reproduction stage also matters. And
that you
J. Liles wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.ptwrote:
J. Liles wrote:
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Dave Malham dave.mal...@york.ac.uk
wrote:
Hi,
This looks good - can't try it at the moment as I am away from my
Linux machine but
/sursound/attachments/20130708/50b22183/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
/sursound
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/**mailman/private/sursound/**
attachments/20130708/50b22183/**attachment.htmlhttps://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130708/50b22183/attachment.html
On 9 July 2013 01:20, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Eric Carmichel wrote:
I am creating ways to *objectively* assess that the physical movement of
air (macro level, not micro) to demonstrate Ambisonics or HOA is suitable
for scientific research. As I recently wrote, it’s the
11 matches
Mail list logo
