Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread Eero Aro
I don't have a proper ambisonic set up, but can listen with hrtfs using ATK + Supercollider. To me this one sounds on the right rather than the left. I hope someone else would also give it a try and tell us, where they hear it coming from. It isn't a bad idea to use an Ambisonic setup for an

Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread Dave Malham
' -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/2013/caa67203/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman

Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread Eero Aro
Dave Malham: Oh - I see, the naming of the files implies LF and simultaneously that it is 330 degrees...which is it, Eero? LF. Funnily though, Dave. I made it with your B-Pan plugin. The Azimuth control of the plugin at 330 degrees points to Left Front. Eero

Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread dw
On 11/11/2013 12:48, Eero Aro wrote: Dave Malham: Oh - I see, the naming of the files implies LF and simultaneously that it is 330 degrees...which is it, Eero? The Harpex display shows it (LF 330) at RF 30 deg.. Can't any of you guys actually play it! There of plenty of reasons why

Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread Eero Aro
David Wareing wrote: Can't any of you guys actually play it! Actually I find that a little bit amusing. :-) Sorry. But there really is something wrong with my files. I think I need to delete all of the files from Dropbox. First: A file player in Audiomulch doesn't open or play my files,

Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread Stefan Schreiber
Andrew Castiglione wrote: Hi, Are we all talking about this as the standard... http://www.ambiophonics.org/AES_Munich_1.htm So we are all the same page correct? Cheers!!! Andrew Castiglione Honestly: I don't understand cryptic postings. So could you get a little bit more clear what

Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread Eero Aro
ITU made a recommendation (in around 1992-94) for surround speaker layouts. It is called ITU-R BS.775-3 http://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-BS.775-3-201208-I I am not aware of any specific _standard_ for the placement of surround sound speakers. Many have followed the ITU recommendation, for example

[Sursound] Fwd: Re: B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread dw
as inputs to to a square of speakers using WigWare(sp?) as the decoder. http://www.freesound.org/people/dwareing/ -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/2013/294bfc4d/attachment.html

Re: [Sursound] B-Format test signals 5.1

2013-11-11 Thread dw
On 11/11/2013 15:39, Andy Furniss wrote: dw wrote: There of plenty of reasons why Ambisonics and binaural should not work well, but it can sound ok to me on My £11 cans.. Interesting can you expand a bit? Here are some links: