Re: [Sursound] how to read common loudspeaker format (CLF) file

2013-11-22 Thread Junfeng Li
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/ef09f5b2/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Hector bird recording - SoundCloud

2013-11-22 Thread dw
Perhaps witchcraft needs some strange settings. For headhones - https://www.dropbox.com/s/iga71wluxfcb4i6/Untitled2.mp3 On 22/11/2013 14:21, dw wrote: On 21/11/2013 19:08, Aaron Heller wrote: I took the liberty of merging them into 4-channel files and putting them on my server, which might

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Richard Furse
Yes - there basically aren't any problems applying the processing operations to material that is only first order. Feeding first order material to a third order decoder raises more subtle issues. If you're working with first order material, we'd normally recommend you still work at third order

[Sursound] 45J recordings - did they / do they exist?

2013-11-22 Thread Richard
/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/3b112ce6/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Hector bird recording - SoundCloud

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Benjamin
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/fb208b96/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Richard Furse
/attachments/20131122/0ef0c46f/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:19:58AM -0800, Aaron Heller wrote: I hate to contradict you, but my experience playing my first-order recordings (e.g. Pulcinella, LvB 4th Sym, available on Ambisonia) on the 2nd or 3rd order presets in Ambdec results in decoding errors. The most obvious artifact

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread David Pickett
At 18:12 22-11-13, Richard Furse wrote: Yes - there basically aren't any problems applying the processing operations to material that is only first order. Feeding first order material to a third order decoder raises more subtle issues. I have obviously missed something. How does one record in

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Joseph Anderson
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/99852949/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Eric Benjamin
: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/1436acf9/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] New Ambisonic VST Plugins

2013-11-22 Thread Michael Chapman
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20131122/1436acf9/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu