Re: [Sursound] VR and cheap headtracking in 2013...

2013-12-03 Thread dw
On 02/12/2013 20:33, Julian Rabius wrote: Of course, personal HRIRs are to be prefered, but up to now I use these: https://dev.qu.tu-berlin.de/projects/measurements/wiki/Impulse_Response_Measurements I came across these KU100 data: http://www.audiogroup.web.fh-koeln.de/ku100hrir.html although

Re: [Sursound] VR and cheap headtracking in 2013...

2013-12-03 Thread dw
On 02/12/2013 21:08, Andy Furniss wrote: Interesting and cheap - not so sure about the magnetometer near speakers. Less of a problem than eating the baked beans that were stowed next to the fluxgate compass sensor, coming down the North Channel one night, one would think.

Re: [Sursound] VR and cheap headtracking in 2013...

2013-12-03 Thread Julian Rabius
Am Dienstag, den 03.12.2013, 19:17 + schrieb dw: I came across these KU100 data: http://www.audiogroup.web.fh-koeln.de/ku100hrir.html although I have not used them, and there are none I fancy.. There is a special fileformat used for these HRIRs, Miro - measured impulse response object,

Re: [Sursound] VR and cheap headtracking in 2013...

2013-12-03 Thread Marc Lavallée
It looks like Miro is just a specification. The data is in standard .mat files that Octave can open; the Miro dataclass is not required to access the data. -- Marc Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:12:46 +0100, Julian Rabius rab...@t-online.de a écrit : Am Dienstag, den 03.12.2013, 19:17 + schrieb dw: