Re: [Sursound] vertical precendence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-15 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 12/15/2015 03:32 AM, Stefan Schreiber wrote: In our discussion before we have found convincing evidence and arguments that head motion should be relevant even to obtain improved vertical localization. Just to set the record straight again: evidence is not to be found on sursound. Evidence

Re: [Sursound] vertical precendence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-15 Thread Peter Lennox
Hi Joseph - yes I did - and that was because there are two main areas of non-linearity in perception, to do with actual proximity in real environments: "peripersonal space" and "auditory looming" - and these are not easily amenable to acoustic-only treatments. That doesn't mean we can't take

Re: [Sursound] vertical precendence and summing localisation (wallis and lee 2015)

2015-12-15 Thread stmar
o...@music.vt.eduhttps://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.   -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20151215