Re: [Sursound] Acoustic dispersive prism article in Nature

2016-01-10 Thread Didrik Madheden
> The University of York > York YO10 5DD > UK > > 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160110/705ee73a/attachment

Re: [Sursound] Acoustic dispersive prism article in Nature

2016-01-10 Thread Dave Malham
> UK > > > > 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' > > ------ next part -- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160110/705ee73a/attachment.html &

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic recordings and noise reduction - best practise?

2016-01-10 Thread Trond Lossius
Thanks for all the replies to my initial question. I have done some testing with all three approaches today. My conclusion so far is that running noise reduction on the B-format signal as two stereo pairs (WX and YZ) ends up distorting the sound field (spatial artefacts, less pronounced

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic recordings and noise reduction - best practise?

2016-01-10 Thread Jean-Pascal Beaudoin
> edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20160110/a8d3aeeb/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing l