Re: [Sursound] MEMS SNR Specifications

-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180828/5d00ad48/attachment.html> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman

Re: [Sursound] A mic array I don't recognise

--On 28 August 2018 16:45 +0200 David Pickett wrote: > Fact: It's expensive (8 Schoeps colette cardioid capsules and > amplifiers = €/$ 12,000) Well, I'd got /that/ far on my own! Paul -- Paul Hodges ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu

Re: [Sursound] A mic array I don't recognise

t; Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > > -- best seva s...@soundcurrent.com www.soundcurrent.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed.

Re: [Sursound] A mic array I don't recognise

At 22:17 20-08-18, Paul Hodges wrote: >Can anyone tell me about this microphone array? > > Yes. Fact: It's expensive (8 Schoeps colette cardioid capsules and amplifiers = €/$ 12,000) Opinion: In comparison with an Octomic, it's a waste of time and

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 121, Issue 13

: https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/promopages/microphones/#technology-1 Best, Stefan -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20180828/c8265538/attachment.h

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 121, Issue 13

f you record a sound with an SPL of say 60 dB (at the mic), the > S/N ratio would be 60 - 24 = 36 dB. Using a 'pro' mic with a self > noise of 10 dB the S/N ratio would be 50 dB. In both cases assuming > the preamp doesn't add a significant amount of noi