Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

Hi Jack, thanks for sharing such a valuable resource for the community. A great effort by all of those involved to compile this. Kind regards, Mark -Original Message- From: Sursound On Behalf Of jack reynolds Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 8:25 PM To: Surround Sound discussion group

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

On 2023-10-17, jack reynolds wrote: It's quite a large project due to the multichannel files Quite the job, so I added the link into the Motherlode as the first outbound link:

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

___ > >> Sursound mailing list > >> Sursound@music.vt.edu > >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > >> edit account or options, view archives and so on. > >> > > -- next part ---

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

o/sursound - unsubscribe here, >> edit account or options, view archives and so on. >> > -- next part -- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20231019/dba2c456/attachment.htm> > __

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20231019/dba2c456/attachment.htm> ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Sursound] A comparison of fifteen ambisonic microphones

Please feel free to outline where you think the errors lie, Len. We have certainly had discussions but I don’t recall you pointing out errors other than your assertion that preamp gain would have a negative effect on the noise performance of your microphones, which we proved to be incorrect by