Sorry about continuing the off-topic...
David Pickett kirjoitti:
What amazed me about the quality of the sound on these old cassettes and
analog tapes is that the quality has been preserved
They are often very good, depending on what kind of a recorder the recording
was made. You can also
On 2013-05-01, David Pickett wrote:
So, analog still rules!
Please die horribly. ;)
--
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
___
Sursound mailing list
At 16:47 01-05-13, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-05-01, David Pickett wrote:
So, analog still rules!
Please die horribly. ;)
You say that, but I have recently been transferring old cassettes to
hard drive and, given that they have a limited bandwidth of about
15kHz, the noise is not
On 2013-05-01, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
While I do agree in principle, the 'quality' you appreciate may have
more to do with the content or production than with the storage
medium.
Now that we went off-topic already, I'll have to remind y'all about
DSD/SACD. Personally I think it has this
At 17:59 01-05-13, Sampo Syreeni wrote:
On 2013-05-01, David Pickett wrote:
You say that, but I have recently been transferring old cassettes to
hard drive and, given that they have a limited bandwidth of about
15kHz, the noise is not intrusive and I have been amazed at the
quality -- a
