Message: 1
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:14:12 +0100
From: J?rn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net
Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post
To: Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com, Surround Sound discussion
group sursound@music.vt.edu
Recommendations
On 02/24/2013 07:25 PM, diatonis wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:14:12 +0100
From: J?rn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net
Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post
To: Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com, Surround Sound discussion
group sursound
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:21PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
many thanks for this link, very very useful indeed. it should be
noted, though, that this text describes a theoretical, best
practises guideline for the audio industry. many very widely
distributed music surround productions
On 02/22/2013 03:25 AM, Eric Carmichel wrote:
Regarding localization, home theatre sound and the 80-Hz xover
point:
I’ll confess ignorance when it comes to knowledge of a separate or
unique physiological mechanism used to localize (or omni-ize)
ultra-low frequencies.
same here. if there is
Jörn brought into the discussion not only filter type and slope, but the
choice of audio interfaces. I have first-generation MOTU 896HD units.
Although there are two FireWire ports on each unit's backside, MOTU states
that the only two units can be synchronized using a FireWire (daisy chain
with recent ffado driver.
Regards
Bo-Erik
-Original Message-
From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On
Behalf Of Michael Chapman
Sent: den 22 februari 2013 09:11
To: Eric Carmichel; Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com wrote:
Within the context of room reflections, music listening,
home theatre, and the like, I’m fully aware that frequencies below 80 Hz
are near impossible to localize. Add to the overall auditory scene the
constituent frequencies
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com wrote:
Oops forgot to add the comment below to my last post;
I suppose there’s no reason to worry about inter-channel timing issues when
using dissimilar components (meaning a MOTU optically linked to an D-A
device). Similar to the