Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-24 Thread diatonis
Message: 1 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:14:12 +0100 From: J?rn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post To: Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com, Surround Sound discussion group sursound@music.vt.edu Recommendations

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-24 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/24/2013 07:25 PM, diatonis wrote: Message: 1 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 06:14:12 +0100 From: J?rn Nettingsmeier netti...@stackingdwarves.net Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post To: Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com, Surround Sound discussion group sursound

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-24 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:42:21PM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: many thanks for this link, very very useful indeed. it should be noted, though, that this text describes a theoretical, best practises guideline for the audio industry. many very widely distributed music surround productions

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-23 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/22/2013 03:25 AM, Eric Carmichel wrote: Regarding localization, home theatre sound and the 80-Hz xover point: I’ll confess ignorance when it comes to knowledge of a separate or unique physiological mechanism used to localize (or omni-ize) ultra-low frequencies. same here. if there is

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Michael Chapman
Jörn brought into the discussion not only filter type and slope, but the choice of audio interfaces. I have first-generation MOTU 896HD units. Although there are two FireWire ports on each unit's backside, MOTU states that the only two units can be synchronized using a FireWire (daisy chain

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Bo-Erik Sandholm
with recent ffado driver. Regards Bo-Erik -Original Message- From: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Chapman Sent: den 22 februari 2013 09:11 To: Eric Carmichel; Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] A Thanks

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Malham
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com wrote: Within the context of room reflections, music listening, home theatre, and the like, I’m fully aware that frequencies below 80 Hz are near impossible to localize. Add to the overall auditory scene the constituent frequencies

Re: [Sursound] A Thanks... And Another Post

2013-02-22 Thread Dave Malham
On 22 February 2013 02:25, Eric Carmichel e...@elcaudio.com wrote: Oops forgot to add the comment below to my last post; I suppose there’s no reason to worry about inter-channel timing issues when using dissimilar components (meaning a MOTU optically linked to an D-A device). Similar to the