There does not seem to be much of this around on Ambisonia/Soundofspace,
so I thought I would do one, for a handy demo on mobiles etc.
http://soundofspace.com/ambisonic_files/63 (JHROY), converted with
wvunpack.exe, convolved using ConvolverVST in Audiomulch, with IRs made
using WigWare,
On 2012-01-12, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Nice work ! Usually for me binaural without head tracking just
produces in-the-head sound. This one is different: on headphones
everything seems to be _behind_ me ! Except for the airplane at the
end which appeared where on could expect it.
This is
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:52:14PM -0500, Hector Centeno wrote:
Thank you Fons for your comments. What parameters did use for zita-bls1? The
default ones?
Yes. As to everything appearing in the back that's probably
just me...
I guess I could use a different HRTF measurement to avoid
the
Le 13 janv. 2012 à 00:52, Hector Centeno a écrit :
I guess I could use a different HRTF measurement to avoid the front/back
reversal. IRCAM's Spat comes with other impulse SDIF files that are 44.1kHz
only so I wonder if anyone knows how to resample them to 48kHz, which is what
I use.
Hi Thibaut,
Is there a specific technical reason for doing it that way, or is it
just more convenient?
Dave
On 13 January 2012 12:47, Thibaut Carpentier thibaut.carpent...@ircam.frwrote:
I do interpolate separately the excess phase part and the magnitude
spectrum, rather than
Thank you Thibaut, I've been looking for these for long time! I couldn't find
them easily in the IRCAM website.
Cheers,
Hector
On 2012-01-13, at 7:47 AM, Thibaut Carpentier wrote:
Le 13 janv. 2012 à 00:52, Hector Centeno a écrit :
I guess I could use a different HRTF measurement to
... so I tested loading these 48kHz filters but I get a Invalid header error
in Max/MSP when trying the HRTF files. The coll files work fine. Is there any
mayor difference between the two that I might be missing? I used a hex editor
to inspect the header and compared it with a 44.1 file and
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:49:12PM -0500, Hector Centeno wrote:
Following up on this thread, I just uploaded a soundscape
piece I made using the Brahma mic, presented here in a
binaural version. The recordings were converted from A
to B-Format with Tetraproc (thanks to Fons for the
dear hector just listened to the recordings, they sound great. on my Sony MDR
V6 headphones, i did not hear the front back reversal. umashankar
From: hcen...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:52:14 -0500
To: sursound@music.vt.edu
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Ambisonic-Binaural piece using
Hi Umashankar (and anyone interested),
Following up on this thread, I just uploaded a soundscape piece I made
using the Brahma mic, presented here in a binaural version. The recordings
were converted from A to B-Format with Tetraproc (thanks to Fons for the
calibrated preset), ambisonic
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:37:18PM -, Michael Chapman wrote:
You are almost certainly aware that TetraProc offers two channel
outputs ...
Fons (some years ago) was quite self-deprecaing about the
Xtalk option. But I appreciated it.
It amounts to a first order highpass on the difference
Hi Michael,
Yes, I'm aware of that and it's a very nice feature. I also use the VST plugin
VVMic for ambisonic to stereo conversion which I'm assuming does something
similar to the stereo output in Tetraproc (virtual mics with adjustable
polarity and orientation). In this case, of course, I'm
Hi Umashankar (and anyone interested),
Following up on this thread, I just uploaded a soundscape piece I made using
the Brahma mic, presented here in a binaural version. The recordings were
converted from A to B-Format with Tetraproc (thanks to Fons for the calibrated
preset), ambisonic decode
13 matches
Mail list logo
