Not since the recent redecoration
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 11:13, seva, soundcurrent mastering <
s...@soundcurrent.com> wrote:
> ah. Tardis alignment. i think it's to the left of the door as you come in.
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:47 AM Dave Malham
> wrote:
>
> > Oh dear, knew there was
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Audeze tetrahedral microphone
ah. Tardis alignment. i think it's to the left of the door as you come in.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:47 AM Dave Malham wrote:
> Oh dear, knew there was something wrong with the settings in the
> Tardis tomorrow. Should will have reme
ah. Tardis alignment. i think it's to the left of the door as you come in.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 7:47 AM Dave Malham wrote:
> Oh dear, knew there was something wrong with the settings in the Tardis
> tomorrow. Should will have remembered it. :-)
>
> Dave
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 05:28,
Oh dear, knew there was something wrong with the settings in the Tardis
tomorrow. Should will have remembered it. :-)
Dave
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 05:28, seva, soundcurrent mastering <
s...@soundcurrent.com> wrote:
> ah, after i posted the question about audeze i found this thread where Dave
i have two D202 from David Lewiston (The Lewiston Archive) and they are
rather fascinating. David didn't use them much but they are in spectacular
condition.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM jon burton wrote:
> Akg D202 was a dual capsule microphone with high frequency capsule and a
> low
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:37:34PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> On 09/09/2015 05:40 PM, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
> >Looks great, although, the capsules look rather large on these images…
> >…so I wonder how that’s going to influence the sound or what sort of
> >calibration they offer.
Has four elements in a tetra arrangement put puts out A Fprmat not B Format !
And no discussion of maipulation of the mic signals, no manual on line, or
specs
Capsules too large - will limit the upper frequency of soundfield coherence ?
FOUR GRAND ???
Worth watching though, thans for the
Well, , ah, this (and their website) all smacks a bit of Snake Oil
to me, though I could be completely wrong. As far as I can find, there are
no technical specifications anywhere (did I miss something?) which is
always a bit suspect when big claims are made. For all their eulogising
about
--On 10 September 2015 10:34 +0100 Dave Malham
wrote:
> There is no way such a large array can NOT
> suffer from horrendous spatial aliasing down to quite low frequencies.
>...
> (Loudspeakers as High-Quality Microphones)
Maybe someone needs to design a mic with a
Akg D202 was a dual capsule microphone with high frequency capsule and a low
frequency capsule behind I believe http://www.coutant.org/akgd202/
The 224 was of a similar design. Both great microphones particular for overdub
vocals and radio. The 224 was my favourite mic for guitars and cellos.
On 10 Sep 2015, at 16:12, jon burton wrote:
> Akg D202 was a dual capsule microphone with high frequency capsule and a low
> frequency capsule behind I believe http://www.coutant.org/akgd202/
> The 224 was of a similar design. Both great microphones particular for
> overdub vocals and radio.
Looks great, although, the capsules look rather large on these images…
…so I wonder how that’s going to influence the sound or what sort of
calibration they offer. Anyone got any experience with one of these?
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 16:49, Courville, Daniel wrote:
>
>
Hello All,
Of interest to this thread, a video posted by Water Lily Acoustics:
https://www.facebook.com/WaterLilyAcoustics/videos/869044249844736/
>From the page:
In this video one sees an Ambisonic (B format) array of four transducers:
> an omni directional microphone, in conjunction with
On 09/09/2015 05:40 PM, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Looks great, although, the capsules look rather large on these images…
…so I wonder how that’s going to influence the sound or what sort of
calibration they offer. Anyone got any experience with one of these?
On Sep 9, 2015, at 16:49,
Ronald C.F. Antony wrote:
Looks great, although, the capsules look rather large on these images?
100mm diameter (per their web page copy)
?so I wonder how that?s going to influence the sound or what sort of
calibration they offer. Anyone got any experience with one of these?
IMO, they
Seems to me the people who know are busy geeking out working on Nth-order stuff
which is too complicated and expensive to be adopted widely, but which of
course is great for academic papers.
Meanwhile people who don't try to reinvent the wheel, make all sorts of
beginner mistakes, fall flat,
Hi all,
I found this demo piano recording of the stereo version. I guess that the
“capsules” are the same.( If anyone is interested.. )
https://soundcloud.com/audeze/schubert-sonata-in-c-minor-by-gustavo-romero
Best
Henrik
HENRIK OPPERMANN • HEAD OF SOUND
VISUALISE, Second Home 68-80
Having listened, I’m not too impressed with this.
best,
John
On Sep 9, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Henrik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found this demo piano recording of the stereo version. I guess that the
> “capsules” are the same.( If anyone is interested.. )
>
>
On 09/09/2015 06:43 PM, Henrik wrote:
Hi all,
I found this demo piano recording of the stereo version. I guess that the
“capsules” are the same.( If anyone is interested.. )
https://soundcloud.com/audeze/schubert-sonata-in-c-minor-by-gustavo-romero
had a quick listen on headphones via
19 matches
Mail list logo