Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2017-01-02 Thread Richard Furse
(confusing) screenshots here: http://www.blueripplesound.com/story/view-screenshots-2017 Best wishes, --Richard > -Original Message- > From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of > Richard Furse > Sent: 10 August 2016 11:54 > To: 'Surround Sound discussion group&#x

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-09-07 Thread Michael Chapman
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Richard Furse wrote: > >> What I'm really hoping doesn't happen is that we change convention >> and then some amazing new toy emerges using something different... > > Consider it the other way round: _your_ amazing toys will have > their influence on ot

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Dave Malham
Agreed on all counts. Dave On 11 August 2016 at 20:17, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46:30PM +0100, Dave Malham wrote: > > > Awww, come on, a bit of mental exercise is good for the soul! :-) :-) > > Agree with that. But having done that sort of mental exercise more > th

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Richard Furse wrote: > What I'm really hoping doesn't happen is that we change convention > and then some amazing new toy emerges using something different... Consider it the other way round: _your_ amazing toys will have their influence on others. Ciao

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46:30PM +0100, Dave Malham wrote: > Awww, come on, a bit of mental exercise is good for the soul! :-) :-) Agree with that. But having done that sort of mental exercise more than once, IMHO the only good reason to inflict it on others is to show that it's not very produc

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Richard Furse
hen some amazing new toy emerges using something different... Thanks, --Richard > -Original Message- > From: Sursound [mailto:sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf Of > Dave Malham > Sent: 10 August 2016 22:47 > To: Surround Sound discussion group > Subject: R

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Steven Boardman
+1 from me too. One standard makes it easier for everyone, Less confusing and less time consuming. How many conversions does one has to do, just to use different plugins in the same chain? I’ve been caught out a few times when checking rigs, only to realise the content has a different channel

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-11 Thread Politis Archontis
+1 for (S)N3D / ACN. To us newbies, as Fons mentioned :-), FuMa makes sense only for 1st-order, and then it is trivial to convert to the above if needed. Best, Archontis On Aug 10, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Richard Furse wrote: > Hi there! > > > > Blue Ripple Sound are wondering about changing thei

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-10 Thread Dave Malham
Awww, come on, a bit of mental exercise is good for the soul! :-) :-) Well, that said, (and this maybe a shock to those that know me) I'm gradually moving towards the view that FuMa may have had its day. The only remaining reason really is compatibility with with earlier materiel and Soundfield mi

Re: [Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-10 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:53:33AM +0100, Richard Furse wrote: > Blue Ripple Sound are wondering about changing their TOA plugins from FuMa > to SN3D (ACN), see http://www.blueripplesound.com/story/consultation-sn3d. > Does anyone have strong feelings on this? Just do it. During the past months

[Sursound] Blue Ripple Sound & SN3D?

2016-08-10 Thread Richard Furse
Hi there! Blue Ripple Sound are wondering about changing their TOA plugins from FuMa to SN3D (ACN), see http://www.blueripplesound.com/story/consultation-sn3d. Does anyone have strong feelings on this? Opinions, rants and raves appreciated, but I'd like to avoid kicking off another format d