What I've always done is to keep the channel sets of different ambisonic
order separate, then design a decoder for each channel set, and mix the
speaker feeds. Perhaps that's overkill.
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 4:25 PM Sampo Syreeni wrote:
> On 2023-06-01, Jan Jacob Hofmann wrote:
>
> > is it
On 2023-06-01, Jan Jacob Hofmann wrote:
is it possible/ reasonable to mix ambisonic encoded information of
different order?
It's possible and it's reasonable, and as Fons Adriansen said above, at
the rather high orders you're talking about, it's not much below
optimality either. This has
Good question,
From my experience, two things may happen.
1. The higher order will have lower amplitude but only to the extra
channels of that order, that means that the spatial resolution of the
reverb elemebt will be lower only, as the energy of the signal is given
from the 1st channel as far
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 03:59:26PM +0200, Jan Jacob Hofmann wrote:
> if a decode of 3rd *and* 7th order information - yielding in one
> encoded file - would be mathematically correct if it comes to the
> decoding of the higher order content. Would there be missing
> something (maybe an overall
Dear list,
I am wondering about this question:
is it possible/ reasonable to mix ambisonic encoded information of different
order?
For example:
The sound-information (synthesized) is encoded in Ambisonic 7th order while the
spatial reverberation of that very sound is encoded „only“ to third
