Some off-topic info:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/01/elsevier_evil.php
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
: sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu [sursound-boun...@music.vt.edu] On Behalf
Of Robert Greene [gre...@math.ucla.edu]
Sent: 12 January 2012 06:15
To: Eric Carmichel; Surround Sound discussion group
Subject: Re: [Sursound] Motivation for authors(Robert's off topic rant!)
Scientific literature ought
Just turning things over in the back of my mind.
Eric was pointing out that, without the peer review that goes with
publication in a prestigious journal, a paper isn't taken seriously. as
Robert points out, peer review offers at least some assurance that a paper
does not contain 'junk
Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk wrote:
...
On the question of publishing but not preaching to the converted, one could
see that some kind of peer review might help.
I'm thinking that specialised publishing from leaders in the field, but
pitching at the early-undergrad /bright-and-interested
