Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Ok - today AUdacity opens the file no problem - go figure seems to be doing the job just fine. I am going to have a proper look at Sox though - seems like a very useful tool On 5 September 2014 07:57, Michael Chapman wrote: > > ​Hi Michael, > > My smiley was meant to indicate 'nice one' no

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

> ​Hi Michael, > My smiley was meant to indicate 'nice one' not 'yer wat??' now it's > LOL. > > Dave​ > If you don't put a beard* on a smiley ... how is one to understand ... ;-))>>> Best regards, Michael * They don't take long to grow ... > > On 5 September 2014 10:30, Mic

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

I just compiled CDP multi-channel toolkit on Linux, and tried channelx, which is very small (48k), and works like a charm. Marc Le Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:58:45 +0100, Richard Dobson a écrit : > Unfortunately it not quite as easy as it should be, as companies such > as Steinberg and Digidesign "e

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Unfortunately it not quite as easy as it should be, as companies such as Steinberg and Digidesign "extend" (i.e. abuse) the documented WAVE format with such things as over-large format chunks; I have had to modify my strictly compliant code more than once to accommodate such technically non-com

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

​Hi Michael, My smiley was meant to indicate 'nice one' not 'yer wat??' now it's LOL. Dave​ On 5 September 2014 10:30, Michael Chapman wrote: > > [?] > > > > I did say 'OT' ... ;-)> > > But, if > sin.wav is a 0.01Hz sine wave, peaking at 1.0 > and > cos.wav is a 0.01Hz cosine wa

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

> [?] > I did say 'OT' ... ;-)> But, if sin.wav is a 0.01Hz sine wave, peaking at 1.0 and cos.wav is a 0.01Hz cosine wave peaking at 1.0, then newX.wav = X.wav x cos.wav - Y.wav x sin.wav newY.wav = X.wav x sin.wav + Y.wav x cos.wav are interesting ... ? Cutting and pasting bits of va

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

[?] On 5 September 2014 09:20, Michael Chapman wrote: > > [OT] > > As there has been some discussion of SoX as a command line file (channel) > splitter, I thought I'd also note: > > You can (as with many audio tools) create slow (e.g. 0.01 Hz) sine and > cosine waves as 'audio' files. > > What

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

[OT] As there has been some discussion of SoX as a command line file (channel) splitter, I thought I'd also note: You can (as with many audio tools) create slow (e.g. 0.01 Hz) sine and cosine waves as 'audio' files. What is rarer, is that you can multiply two 'audio' files, so you can produce r

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Nuendo doesn't surprise me, since none of the versions I've tried (right back to 1.7 (?)) handles multi channel files properly - at least, not what I would call "properly". Audacity does surprise me 'cos I've just thrown a 32 channel file at my copy on this Macbook and it was quite happy... Dav

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Oops! I sent my message by accident... Augustine, here's how to extract your channels with sox, one by one (without coding): sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile02.wav remix 2 sox myfile.wav myfile03.wav remix 3 sox myfile.wav myfile04.wav remix 4 sox myfile.wav myfile05.wav

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfile.wav myfile01.wav remix 1 sox myfil

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Thanks Michael - Ill give it a go - but I am a wee bit codaphobic. On 4 September 2014 05:31, Michael Chapman wrote: > > nope at least not nuendo 4 - when you selcet "split channels" it says it > > cant do it - I know you can do it with 8 channel stuff. Audacity said the > > same. I will tr

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

> nope at least not nuendo 4 - when you selcet "split channels" it says it > cant do it - I know you can do it with 8 channel stuff. Audacity said the > same. I will tr some of the other solutions on here, thanks guys ;) > best, > Gus > > The SoX page gives:

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

nope at least not nuendo 4 - when you selcet "split channels" it says it cant do it - I know you can do it with 8 channel stuff. Audacity said the same. I will tr some of the other solutions on here, thanks guys ;) best, Gus On 3 September 2014 13:28, Lasse Munk wrote: > hi sorry i'm not infron

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Hello Augustine. You can use ffmpeg (available for Windows). Here's how to split a 6 channels file in 6 mono files: ffmpeg -y -i Nums_5dot1_24_48000.wav \ -acodec pcm_s24le -map_channel 0.0.0 1.wav \ -acodec pcm_s24le -map_channel 0.0.1 2.wav \ -acodec pcm_s24le -map_channel 0.0.2 3.wav \ -acodec

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

On 2014-09-03, Martin Leese wrote: It's a command line program. Very fast. Needs lotsa careful typing. Or sloppy typing into a text editor to create a BAT file. Then execute the BAT file. And, by the way, if you need some de novo code to do something like that, it ain't gonna be too expen

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

I've imported a 5.1 file into audacity and it automatically seperates all audio tracks...don't see why it would be any different with 10.2 > On Sep 2, 2014, at 8:54 PM, Augustine Leudar wrote: > > Hi, > Does anyone know any software that will allow me to split an interleaved > 10.2 file into its

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Eero Aro wrote: ... > It's a command line program. Very fast. Needs lotsa careful typing. Or sloppy typing into a text editor to create a BAT file. Then execute the BAT file. Regards, Martin -- Martin J Leese E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/

[Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 File

urville) 12. Re: Splitting a 10.2 file (Emanuele) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 00:54:08 -0300 From: Augustine Leudar To: Surround Sound discussion group Subject: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi,

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

hi sorry i'm not infront of my nuendo computer at the moment, but it is possible in nuendo. You can even assign a shortcut for it. Try to search around for something like 'nuendo split multichannel to mono' 2014-09-03 17:20 GMT+02:00 Emanuele : > You could also try Wave Agent from Sound Devices,

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

sound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote: > Message: 9 > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 09:20:45 +0100 > From: Dave Malham > To: Surround Sound discussion group > Subject: Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > &

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

You could also try Wave Agent from Sound Devices, free of charge from their website. On 03/09/2014 12:25, Pierre Alexandre Tremblay wrote: there is also (on Mac) Scott Wilson's de-interleaver. http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/beast/research/mulch.aspx p Le 3 sept. 2014 à 10:20, Dave

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

there is also (on Mac) Scott Wilson's de-interleaver. http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/beast/research/mulch.aspx p Le 3 sept. 2014 à 10:20, Dave Malham a écrit : > Some fine command line tools there, should be easy with them but Max > would be ok if if you're allergic to the command li

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Some fine command line tools there, should be easy with them but Max would be ok if if you're allergic to the command line, tho' I would use Plogue Bidule as it's more straightforward for that sort of task. Alternatively, Audacity will split to separate channels (works up to at least 32 channels

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

On OsX, you can get SoxWrap, a GUI frontend to Sox. Also freeware from RME: RMEWAVprocessor Florian ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view ar

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

> Hi, > Does anyone know any software that will allow me to split an interleaved 10.2 file into its separate channels for mixing. I've tried audition and Nuendo to no avail. I'm on a PC at the moment so soundhack is not an option, > best, > Gus SoX : "7 Feb 2013 ...

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Augustine Leudar Sent: den 3 september 2014 05:55 To: Surround Sound discussion group Subject: Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file I guess I could just use max with an sfplay going into seperate record channels - but I am trying to avoid it On 3 September 2014 00:54, Augustine Leudar wrote

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

I'm pretty sure Wave Agent will handle 12 tracks: (788 has 8 ISOs, L,R, Aux 1, Aux 2.) John On 3 Sep 2014, at 07:08, Eero Aro wrote: > I am not sure if the Sound Devices Wave Agent will handle that much tracks. ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@mu

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Also these came into mind: I think Richard Dobson's Channelx will split any multichannel file: http://people.bath.ac.uk/masrwd/mctools.html It's a command line program. Very fast. Needs lotsa careful typing. - - - I have also sometimes made a real time conversion from a multichannel file into

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Hi Augustine I am not sure if the Sound Devices Wave Agent will handle that much tracks. Most likely it will. I have used it for 4, 6 and 8 track multichannel files. http://www.sounddevices.com/notes/recorders/wave-agent/wave-agent-1-16-available-for-mac-os-and-windows/ or http://tinyurl.com/3

Re: [Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

I guess I could just use max with an sfplay going into seperate record channels - but I am trying to avoid it On 3 September 2014 00:54, Augustine Leudar wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone know any software that will allow me to split an interleaved > 10.2 file into its separate channels for mixin

[Sursound] Splitting a 10.2 file

Hi, Does anyone know any software that will allow me to split an interleaved 10.2 file into its separate channels for mixing. I've tried audition and Nuendo to no avail. I'm on a PC at the moment so soundhack is not an option, best, Gus -- next part -- An HTML attachment was