Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 91, Issue 19

Guys, I don't know how you came to the conclusion that ambisonics wouldn't be part of the discussion but I have been added to this panel as well and you can bet I will talk about ambisonics. You may also be interested t

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 91, Issue 19

​ Big mistake on NAB's part. As part of their mission statement, to provide "continued education for broadcasters at all stages of their career." If the enineers at NAB wanted to honestly evaluate VR audio, the would need to include Ambisonics. Ambiosonics included in the last AES convention's V

Re: [Sursound] Sursound Digest, Vol 91, Issue 19

Bob Burton wrote: > There is a Virtual Reality Audio session at this years NAB in Vegas. > > DTS, Dolby and Q Department. No Ambisonics. > > Big mistake in my opinion. Big mistake for whom? For companies, the big problem with Ambisonics is that it cannot be patented (because the patents have ex