Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-02-19 Thread Andy Furniss
Matthias Kronlachner wrote: So I finally got to get round this one tonight - though the workaround is probably sub optimal. I did try others, but jack was in a state from all the crashing where nothing was working, leading me to falsely think they were all failing and dismiss them. thanks for

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-02-17 Thread Andy Furniss
Andy Furniss wrote: Matthias Kronlachner wrote: what exactly are the problems with the standalone build? as they are working fine for me under debian. ambix_binaural_standalone_o5 will segfault when I connect its output to system playback using qjackctl connections window. So I finally

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-02-17 Thread Matthias Kronlachner
On 18/02/14 02:12, Andy Furniss wrote: ambix_binaural_standalone_o5 will segfault when I connect its output to system playback using qjackctl connections window. So I finally got to get round this one tonight - though the workaround is probably sub optimal. I did try others, but jack was in a

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-02-07 Thread Andy Furniss
Matthias Kronlachner wrote: On 06/02/14 21:34, Andy Furniss wrote: Matthias Kronlachner wrote: hi! i finally got my ambisonic plug-ins to a stage where i'd like to share them with the community. these are working under windows, osx and linux as vst, lv2 and standalone applications. (the linux

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-02-06 Thread Andy Furniss
Matthias Kronlachner wrote: hi! i finally got my ambisonic plug-ins to a stage where i'd like to share them with the community. these are working under windows, osx and linux as vst, lv2 and standalone applications. (the linux version still needs some treat - help wanted!) Thanks for getting

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-02-06 Thread Matthias Kronlachner
On 06/02/14 21:34, Andy Furniss wrote: Matthias Kronlachner wrote: hi! i finally got my ambisonic plug-ins to a stage where i'd like to share them with the community. these are working under windows, osx and linux as vst, lv2 and standalone applications. (the linux version still needs some

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-01-26 Thread Justin Bennett
On 26 Jan 2014, at 18:00, sursound-requ...@music.vt.edu wrote: sounds great! Any plans to also make an AU version of the plugins for OSX? actually you can compile it as au too (as soon as you find the very well hidden au sdk from apple...!), but i see no good reason for doing so. as far as

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-01-26 Thread Matthias Kronlachner
On 26/01/14 21:35, Justin Bennett wrote: Thanks Matthias for posting these. Actually I use Logic often for B-format 1st order mixing (it has a 4 channel bus), then I decode the B-format afterwards if I need more speaker feeds. Also because Logic has binaural panners I find it very useful for

[Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-01-25 Thread Matthias Kronlachner
hi! i finally got my ambisonic plug-ins to a stage where i'd like to share them with the community. these are working under windows, osx and linux as vst, lv2 and standalone applications. (the linux version still needs some treat - help wanted!) get the source code (GPL), OSX/WIN binaries

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-01-25 Thread Ronald C.F. Antony
Hi, sounds great! Any plans to also make an AU version of the plugins for OSX? Best regards, Ronald On 25 Jan 2014, at 20:11, Matthias Kronlachner m.kronlach...@student.tugraz.at wrote: i finally got my ambisonic plug-ins to a stage where i'd like to share them with the community.

Re: [Sursound] ambiX v0.1 Ambisonic software, mcfx v0.1

2014-01-25 Thread Matthias Kronlachner
On 25/01/14 20:44, Ronald C.F. Antony wrote: Hi, sounds great! Any plans to also make an AU version of the plugins for OSX? actually you can compile it as au too (as soon as you find the very well hidden au sdk from apple...!), but i see no good reason for doing so. as far as i know logic is