Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-26 Thread Marinos Koutsomichalis
Contemporary Music Research Centre (CMRC) www.marinoskoutsomichalis.com www.agxivatein.com skype: marinosk_81 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/2026/4e2169b8/attachment.html

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-26 Thread Richard Dobson
On 26/11/2011 05:07, Sampo Syreeni wrote: .. As I said this may be the 'true way', but basically, IMO, it's yet another attempt by Apple to create yet another format 'the other lot can't read'. Fully agreed. Though then you'd have to agree it's a neat format per se. Well-thought out, as

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-26 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 01:46:17AM -, John Lundsten wrote: Now if Mac OS is a belief system for you, It isn't, I'm not a MAC user (as you could guess from my e-mail address). Have a look at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff536383%28v=vs.85%29.aspx to see that

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-26 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 11/25/2011 06:49 PM, Martin Leese wrote: Marinos Koutsomichalismari...@agxivatein.com wrote: quite a few ideas thus far.. but still I' m not quite sure about the most important issue: which is the most 'common' file-format for such things ? Four channel works are not common. Therefore,

[Sursound] Can anyone having ISO 9613-1 check this ?

2011-11-26 Thread Fons Adriaensen
Hello all, A few days ago I posted a simple C function to calculate sound absorption in air (reproduced below), adding that the origin of this code was not clear. Joern reported that it could have been [1]. That is not the case, in fact it was the Javascript code at [2]. But comparing the two,

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-26 Thread Marinos Koutsomichalis
if I make a 4 channel ac3 file - wouldn' t that be ok for people having 5.1 setups ?? the order of the 5.1 is FL/FR/SL/SR/C/LF (or I am mistaken in this?) so if somenody tries to playback a 4-channel file it will be routed to all but the sub and the centre, right ??? m On 26 Nov 2011, at

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-26 Thread Sampo Syreeni
On 2011-11-26, Fons Adriaensen wrote: * The order of the 5.1 channels depends on where you are and on the phase of the moon. You should find out what the particular SW you'd use to make the encoded file expects. In most formats, the order is the same as in the USB and WAVE channel masks.

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release

2011-11-26 Thread Richard G Elen
On 25/11/2011 23:26, Marinos Koutsomichalis wrote: about the 4 channels: they are 4 channels of audio to be played back by a quad set-up.. In fact they are decoded from a b-format recording, but what I want to release is a quad version of the piece. Hi there... Sorry not to contribute to

[Sursound] online multichannel release: HTML5 test

2011-11-26 Thread etienne deleflie
I've been meaning to try out HTML5's capabilities for a while, now seems a good time. http://soundofspace.com/static/test_html5.html This page hosts an (ambisonicaly decoded) 5.1 file in AAC and AC3 using HTML5 the browser should automatically choose the one it can support.

Re: [Sursound] Can anyone having ISO 9613-1 check this ?

2011-11-26 Thread Junfeng Li
Hi, all, According to the following paper, theh = r * powf (10.0f, C) / p should be correct, where p = P_s/P_{s0}, the relative pressure. Benjamin Bernfeld, Absorption of sound by air: a personal calculator program, J. AES, vo. 28, 1980. If anyone could share the PDF of ISO 9613-1, it will

Re: [Sursound] online multichannel release: HTML5 test

2011-11-26 Thread Bill de Garis
Latest version of Firefox (8.0) on Win7 64bit. Alls I get it the spinning dots when I press play. Nothing else. No sound. Bill On 26/11/11 8:08 p.m., etienne deleflie wrote: I've been meaning to try out HTML5's capabilities for a while, now seems a good time.