Marc Lavallée wrote :
This list is not the place to explain why, but I must also mention
that I'm strictly non-Facebook.
Amen
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
Eric Benjamin wrote :
I don't understand what would be the benefit of a facebook group
I certainly sympathize with all of those who have posted anti-facebook
comments.
That is why I maintain only a minimal facebook presence. But it does
seem to
me that there are some benefits. Like
John Leonard wrote:
Hmm,
I'm strictly non-Facebook and I'm afraid I'm not going to change my views,
even for Ambisonics.
Ditto.
In my case, the reason was elegantly
explained by Douglas Adams:
I've [Douglas Adams has] come up with a set
of rules that describe our reactions to
technology:
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20121008/40415ba7/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo
Oh well, looks like I am the odd one out, again...I am on FB, but under
what for convenience I will call my stage name, which my friends know
and understand but my music students or the idly curious will never find;
On 08/10/2012 21:54, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
In my case, the *reason* is
It is rather alarming how insubstantial it all is--
google ,facebook, apple selling gadgets that are
really quite useless and google and facebook
making money on ads and no other way(google
sells how far up the search list you are but
that is ad stuff too in effect)
The whole USA and a good deal
This is funny but it is of course wrong,
I like facebook a lot, but I dislike text messages,
and so on. Which general types of things one likes
may develop early, but the details are not
set in stone. This kind of thing is
an excuse for all kinds of bad stuff
that is supposed to be progress but
so ... what's all this about a portal ?
On 9 October 2012 01:24, Robert Greene gre...@math.ucla.edu wrote:
This is funny but it is of course wrong,
I like facebook a lot, but I dislike text messages,
and so on. Which general types of things one likes
may develop early, but the details are
Very much off topic is what follows.
Just as a point of information, I think Hitler's election
did not depend on fraud. I think he actually did have
a lot of popular support at one point . Why is a complex
question, but I believe he did, though of course
he was not above fraud if fraud was
At 22:19 08/10/2012, Robert Greene wrote:
it is quite true that the search engines, for all their
remarkable power, do not promote in -depth study of things
or issues. Too much piffle comes up too easily--if commercial
interests are invovled
I have also found this to be a problem and use, eg,
Very much off topic is what follows.
Just as a point of information, I think Hitler's election
did not depend on fraud. I think he actually did have
a lot of popular support at one point . Why is a complex
question, but I believe he did, though of course
he was not above fraud if fraud was
11 matches
Mail list logo
