Unless things have changed a lot, last I checked lossy compression messes up
phase relationships, and that would be an issue for things like UHJ, which as
long as portable stereo players with limited battery life (and thus limited
CPUs), is the only viable, because stereo compatible,
Am I missing something? - for mobile use, wouldn't B-format to binaural be
better than UHJ?
Dr Peter Lennox
School of Technology,
Faculty of Arts, Design and Technology
University of Derby, UK
e: p.len...@derby.ac.uk
t: 01332 593155
From:
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20121030/2451f92c/attachment.html
___
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman
Richard Lee wrote:
Take your favourite Nimbus UHJ CD and
rip it using the most evil MP3 encoder you can find
Sorry, slightly off-topic, but still:
Some people have done terrible data reduction to UHJ recordings already:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnvRtM5WDsc
There's also the possibility of a new version of Broadcast Wav (BWF).
Dave
Thanks Dave, URL and/or other reference ???
'Native' CAF also has the possibility for 'W,X,Y,Z' so (again without
acknowledgment) I suspect that could be counted as a *.amb
variant.
MPEG formats: anyone have
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Michael Chapman s...@mchapman.com wrote:
'Native' CAF also has the possibility for 'W,X,Y,Z' so (again without
acknowledgment) I suspect that could be counted as a *.amb
variant.
Has anyone had any success with this? It's in the Core Audio header
files, but a
Whatever it is, if it's a 32-bit file format, it should be considered
deprecated.
CAF is at least explicitly designed to be a 64-bit format. It's also designed
such that during recording a crash of the app can leave a recoverable file
behind by the way the header structures are designed, much
On 29 Oct 2012, at 20:42, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Ronald, most if not all (classical) recordings where I am participating are
done in a way that they could be issued in 5.1 (or say 5.0) surround, namely
several Pentatone recordings, and even the more recent
On 30 Oct 2012, at 06:24, Peter Lennox p.len...@derby.ac.uk wrote:
Am I missing something? - for mobile use, wouldn't B-format to binaural be
better than UHJ?
Dr Peter Lennox
Of course it would. Do you know of a mobile playback device with multi-channel
audio support, multi-channel audio
On 29 Oct 2012, at 20:56, Stefan Schreiber st...@mail.telepac.pt wrote:
Oh yes, go to Apple and look if they listen to your ideas, and let others do
their stuff instead of doing some promotion for some stylish, fahionable
campany offering super slim products.
You make my point: they won't
10 matches
Mail list logo
