Re: [Sursound] A higher standard of standardness

2013-07-03 Thread David Pickett
At 06:31 3/7/2013, Robert Greene wrote: Variations from reality ought surely to be based on knowing how to reproduce the reality first and then introducing the variations. One does not bend pitches for artistic effect until one is able to play in tune, so to speak. Yes, indeed; but such

Re: [Sursound] A higher standard of standardness

2013-07-03 Thread Dave Malham
-- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130703/9f46c0ae/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] A higher standard of standardness

2013-07-03 Thread Richard G Elen
On 03/07/2013 05:31, Robert Greene wrote: If people want to treat recording as a pure art form where one simply judges the results on aesthetic grounds. it would be hard to say that was wrong. But it surely takes recording out of the realm of science. I am not sure that recording is a science

[Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread Moritz Fehr
://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130703/2415a0a0/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread Michael Chapman
Dear Members of Sursound, i am using the VVMicVst Plugin in Reaper for mixing and decoding my B-Format recordings. The plugin is limited to an output of 8 channels. For a new sound installation, I would like to decode to 16 channels (two circles of 8 speakers stacked). I know that I could

Re: [Sursound] A higher standard of standardness

2013-07-03 Thread umashankar manthravadi
... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130703/e6f4e754/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread Moritz Fehr
other plugins or tools available for this purpose (OSX) ? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Best, Moritz -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130703/2415a0a0

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread Michael Chapman
...i will look at ambdec but it does seem to need a lot of routing using jack. Sixteen speakers need a lot of routing whatever you use ... said not to be unfriendly, just to emphasise I'm not sure I understand ;-) If you are worried about repeatedly having to connect everything, then IIRC

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread ThomasChen
for this purpose (OSX) ? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Best, Moritz -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130703/2415a0a0/attachment.html

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread Martin Leese
Moritz Fehr wrote: ... i am going to record a space with a soundfield mic and i would like to then make a simulation of it by setting up an array of 16 speakers. one speaker circle is on ear level, the other one above. i would like to use the second circle above to add height information to

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread David McGriffy
as i can see now, adding a second instance of vvmic or harpex might not be suitable as it would generate two separate soundfields. (not sure if i am right here...) I can't speak for Harpex (and I can imagine reasons why it might not work), but it should be no problem to use two copies of

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread Aaron Heller
-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130703/2415a0a0/attachment.html ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https

[Sursound] Round Arrays in Square Spaces: A Case of Iteracy

2013-07-03 Thread Eric Carmichel
, but it is all about Ambisonics. Best to All, Eric 'Blockhead' C. **URL to photo is www.cochlearconcepts.com/for_sursound/tetra_mount.jpg -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20130703

Re: [Sursound] A higher standard of standardness

2013-07-03 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 07/03/2013 06:31 AM, Robert Greene wrote: I apologize if people took offense. fwiw, i did not take offense at your clear preference for realistic recordings (which i share and aspire to as well). i do object to hand-wavey cultural pessimism that postulates the end of scientific

Re: [Sursound] Ambisonics - Decoding 16 channels in DAW

2013-07-03 Thread Fons Adriaensen
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:15:58PM -0400, Daniel Courville wrote: Two instances of Harpex-B, each one on a separate output bus, in shotgun mode, each decoding to eight shotguns, using the Cube preset as a starting point. M Readers of this list will know me as one of those who,