On 14/04/2012 18:23, Martin Leese wrote:
Somebody who was involved at the time (which I was not) would be better able to answer this.
Thatcher came to power in 1979. In 1981, the NRDC was merged into the British Technology Group. It
is true that development and promotion of Ambisonics was the
Ronald C.F. Antony r...@cubiculum.com wrote:
On 12 Apr 2012, at 19:57, Martin Leese martin.le...@stanfordalumni.org
wrote:
...
The UK Government, through the
National Research Development Corporation,
strongly supported the development of
Ambisonics; they paid for it. While the NRDC
had
was it not true that the UK did not, or would not, help to support
the ambisonic fledgling business due to some frustrating legal
restriction? this was a major point in the killing of the launch.
in addition, when MAG openly criticized (and mathematically gutted)
the Quad stuff, he did not
seva s...@soundcurrent.com
was it not true that the UK did not, or would not, help to support
the ambisonic fledgling business due to some frustrating legal
restriction? this was a major point in the killing of the launch.
I assume by the UK you mean the UK
Government. The UK Government,
At 22:10 10/04/2012, Robert Greene wrote:
One thing that crosses my mind is this:
and a lot more...
I dont often agree with Robert, but I agree with him entirely in this posting.
Second, in the exploration of why Ambisonics did not
succeed commercially(yet), it seems to me important
David Pickett d...@fugato.com a écrit :
Second, in the exploration of why Ambisonics did not
succeed commercially(yet), it seems to me important
to understand the whole nature of the success of technological
products. They succeed if they offer a lot but demand nothing
of the consumer
