[Sursound] OctoMic and TetraMic B-format Files

2018-04-13 Thread Len Moskowitz
At the bottom of this post are links to two B-format files (in ambiX format) that highlight the improvement that OctoMic provides over any 1st-order ambisonic microphone, including our TetraMic. OctoMic is the first 2nd-order ambisonic microphone commercially available at reasonable cost. We i

Re: [Sursound] OctoMic and TetraMic B-format Files

2018-04-13 Thread Luke David Harris
-sound.com > Home of OctoMic and TetraMic > > ___ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view ar

Re: [Sursound] Rode Soundfield NT-SF1

2018-04-13 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 04/12/2018 03:33 PM, Jack Reynolds wrote: So is a larger radius A-Format mic not a problem then? I always thought the radius dictated the upper frequency limit for spatial aliasing. The radius defines the frequency at which the array stops behaving like a coincident array. Above that frequ

Re: [Sursound] Rode Soundfield NT-SF1

2018-04-13 Thread Jack Reynolds
That’s what I thought. I have also heard that a radius smaller than 15mm or so has detrimental effects on the low end ___ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or

Re: [Sursound] Rode Soundfield NT-SF1

2018-04-13 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 04/13/2018 10:23 AM, Jack Reynolds wrote: That’s what I thought. I have also heard that a radius smaller than 15mm or so has detrimental effects on the low end The is probably related to the size of the capsules. As you bring the radius down you have to use smaller capsules and the low fre